Soil Hydrological Effects of Typical Forest Types in Upper Reaches of Liaohe River
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] Studying the hydrological effects of understory soil of typical forest types in the upper reaches of Liaohe River, aimed to provide theoretical evidence for the monitoring and evaluation of the forest ecosystem health.[Methods] The understory soils of some typical forest types were chosen to research their infiltration processes, and upon which the processes were fitted with several permeability models.[Results](1) The soil bulk density ranged from about 1.21 g/cm3 to 1.56 g/cm3, the maximum value was found in the middle-aged Pinus tabuliformisforest and maturePopulus davidianaforest had the minimum bulk density. The range of the total soil porosity was 41.26%~54.38%, mature Populus davidiana forest had the maximum porosity and middle-aged Pinus tabuliformis had the minimum porosity; (2) The soil water-holding capacity of mature Populus davidiana forest was greatest with a value of 1 087.56 t/hm2 and middle-aged Pinus tabulaeformis forest had the minimum value of 825.17 t/hm2; (3) The steady infiltration rate of mature Populus davidiana forest was 1.33 mm/min; (4) Both Horton infiltration model and Philip model could reflect the soil infiltration course of each forest vegetation well, while the common power functional infiltration performed poorly.[Conclusion] The soils of different forest types had greater bulk density in deeper layer. The soil water storage capacity was bigger under broad-leaved forest than that under under coniferous forest. Horton model could be used as an important means to study the local hydrological function of forest soil.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

宋小帅,康峰峰,韩海荣,于晓文,胡景东,赵伟红,高晶,赵金龙,韩树文.辽河源典型森林类型的土壤水文效应[J].水土保持通报英文版,2015,35(2):101-105

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:February 24,2014
  • Revised:March 18,2014
  • Adopted:
  • Online: April 05,2016
  • Published: