Hydrological Effect of Litter Layer and Soil Layer Under Typical Stands in Luanhe River
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [16]
  • |
  • Related
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] To study the hydrological effect of typical forest litter layer and soil layer on the upper Luanhe River, in order to provide theoretical basis for monitoring and evaluation of the forest. [Methods] The non-decomposed layer and semi-decomposed layer of three different types forest litter were investigated. [Results] (1) The litter accumulation amount, the maximum moisture capacity, and the effective retaining content of Pinus tabulaeformis forest were 12.03, 19.4, and 23.52 t/hm2 respectively, those of larch forest were 9.51, 11.9, and 17.03 t/hm2 respectively, and those of mixed forest of larch and birch were 5.54, 13.0, and 13.7 t/hm2, respectively. (2) It nearly reached saturation in 8 h for semi-decomposed layer, while it needed 10 h for non-decomposed layer. The water absorption rate of litter reached maximum within 0.5 h, and it slowed down obviously at about 6 h. (3) The water holding capacity of soil layer for Larix gmelini and Betula platyphylla mixed forest was highest, which was 375.92 t/hm2, while it was lowest in soil layer of Pinus tabulaeformis forest, which was 248.04 t/hm2. Using the power function to fit the infiltration rate and infiltration time, the correlation coefficient R2 was more than 0.98. [Conclusion] The biomass, maximum water holding capacity, and the effective holding capacity are maximum in the litter layer of Pinus tabulaeformis forest, and the mixed forest of larch and birch have the highest soil water holding capacity.

    Reference
    [1] 于志明,王礼先.水源涵养林效益研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1991:32-37.
    [2] 吴钦孝,赵鸿雁.森林枯枝落叶层涵养水源保持水土的作用评价[J].水土保持学报,1998,4(2):23-28.
    [3] 王雄宾,余新晓.华北土石山区油松林生态系统健康评价[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(1):97-102.
    [4] 张振明,余新晓.不同林分枯落物层的水文生态功能[J].水土保持学报,2006,19(3):139-143.
    [5] Kavvaadias V A, Alifragis D, Tsiontsis A, et al. Litter fall litter accumulation and litter decomposition rates in four forest ecosystem in Northern Greece[J].Forest Ecology Management, 2001,144(1/2/3):113-117.
    [6] 王卫军,赵婵璞,姜鹏,等.塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林水源涵养功能研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2013,33(2):66-68.
    [7] Nunez D, Nahuelhual L, Oyarzun C. Forests and water:the value of native forests in supplying water for human consumption[J].Ecological Economics,2006(5):606-616.
    [8] 鲁绍伟,陈波,潘青华,等.北京山地不同密度侧柏人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报, 2013,27,(1),224-229.
    [9] 徐娟,余新晓.北京十三陵不同林分枯落物层和土壤层水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(3):189-193.
    [10] 韩同吉,裴胜民,张光灿,等.北方石质山区典型林分枯落物层涵蓄水分特征[J].山东农业大学学报,2005,36(2):275-278.
    [11] 胡淑萍,余新晓.北京百花山森林枯落物层和土壤层水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(1):146-150.
    [12] 朱丽晖,李冬.辽东山区天然次生林枯落物层的水文生态功能[J].辽宁林业科技,2001(1):35-37.
    [13] 饶良懿,朱金兆,毕华兴.重庆四面山森林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].北京林业大学学报,2005,27(1):33-37.
    [14] 刘世荣,温远光,王兵,等.中国森林生态系统水文生态功能规律[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1996.
    [15] 孙艳红,张洪江,程金花,等.缙云山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):106-109.
    [16] 田育新,李锡泉,吴建平,等.小流域森林生态系统林地土壤渗透性能研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(4):173-175.
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

张宁,郭宾良,张楠,张绍杰,张建华,谷建才.滦河典型林分枯落物层与土壤层的水文效应[J].水土保持通报英文版,2015,35(3):44-48

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:831
  • PDF: 1329
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:September 21,2014
  • Revised:October 03,2014
  • Online: April 05,2016