Farmers' Satisfaction of Rural Land Consolidation Project
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [27]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • |
  • Cited by [1]
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] This paper aimed to diagnosis the level of the rural land consolidation project performance based on the farmers' satisfaction in order to provide some references for policy making.[Methods] The evaluation index system of rural land consolidation project performance was constructed based on the farmers' satisfaction, then the empirical analysis was conducted by comprehensive evaluation method, paired sample T test and the IPA(importance performance analysis) analysis.[Results] The farmers' satisfaction of the rural land consolidation project was 3.747 5, and the rural land consolidation project performance level was in the "good" class. The project result performance level was higher than the process performance level. The important factors impacting rural land consolidation project performance level mainly included the adoption degree of farmers' opinions in the stage of the decision-making, consultation with farmers' opinions in the stage of planning programming, the adoption degree of farmers' opinions in the stage of planning programming, the clear subject of final management maintenance, production cost reduction, the sound system of final management maintenance, the supply of funds for the final management maintenance, the perfect measures of final management maintenance, the degree of farmers' participation in the stage of the decision making, agricultural scale production, the biodiversity conservation, the ability of fighting natural calamities for farmland, quality of farmland shelterbelts, farmers' participation in the completion acceptance, and so on.[Conclusion] They are reasonable and feasible that the evaluation index system of the rural land consolidation project performance was established based on the farmers' satisfaction, while the level of the rural land consolidation project performance was diagnosed by comprehensive evaluation method, paired sample T test and the IPA analysis.

    Reference
    [1] 项晓敏,金晓斌,王温鑫,等.供给侧结构性改革视角下的土地整治制度创新初探[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(4):12-21.
    [2] 曲衍波,朱伟亚,郧文聚,等.基于压力-状态-响应模型的土地整治空间格局及障碍诊断[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(3):241-249.
    [3] 管栩,金晓斌,杨绪红,等.中国农用地整理项目安排与耕地资源分布的协调性研究[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(2):226-234.
    [4] 黄学锋,金晓斌,张晓霞,等.土地整治项目对农田生态系统影响的能值分析[J].中国农业大学学报,2017,22(4):47-57.
    [5] Luo Wenbin, Timothy D J. An assessment of farmers' satisfaction with land consolidation performance in China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2017,61:501-510.
    [6] 郑华伟,陈晓,程锦,等.农用地整治项目农户有效参与分析[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(19):311-315.
    [7] 国土资源部,国家发展和改革委员会.《全国土地整治规划(2016-2020年)》[R/OL].(2017-01-10)[2018-05-10]. http://www.mlr.gov.cn/zwgk/zytz/201702/t20170215_1440315.htm.
    [8] 唐秀美,潘瑜春,刘玉,等.基于全过程的土地整治项目实施问题、成因及对策研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):35-42.
    [9] 郑华伟,周家俊,刘友兆.利益相关者视角下农地整治项目绩效测度目标分析[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(5):577-580.
    [10] 罗文斌.中国土地整理项目绩效评价、影响因素及改善策略[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
    [11] 郑华伟.农村土地整理项目绩效的形成、测度与改善[D].江苏南京:南京农业大学,2012.
    [12] Giedrius P, Vida M. Towards sustainable rural development in Central and Eastern Europe:Applying land consolidation[J].Land Use Policy, 2010,27(2):545-549.
    [13] 汪文雄,罗冰,杨帆,等.不完全与不确定信息条件下农地整治项目绩效评价研究[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(6):75-81.
    [14] 文高辉,杨钢桥,李文静,等.基于农民视角的农地整理项目绩效评价及其障碍因子诊断[J].资源科学,2014,36(1):26-34.
    [15] 李冰清,王占岐,金贵.新农村建设背景下的土地整治项目绩效评价[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(3):68-74.
    [16] Jia wentao, Liu Junming, Yu Lina, et al. Design and implementation of a GPS-based field survey system for land consolidation and rehabilitation Projects[J].New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 2007,50(5):879-885.
    [17] 汪文雄,汪萍,罗冰,等.农户有效参与提升农地整治项目绩效的机理研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(7):159-168.
    [18] 郝祖涛,冯兵,谢雄标,等.基于民生满意度的资源型城市转型绩效测度及群体差异研究[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(8):1298-1310.
    [19] 罗文斌,吴次芳,倪尧,等.基于农户满意度的土地整理项目绩效评价及区域差异研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(8):68-74.
    [20] 余亮亮,蔡银莺.基于农户满意度的耕地保护经济补偿政策绩效评价及障碍因子诊断[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(7):1092-1103.
    [21] 郑华伟,高洁芝,臧玉杰,等.农村生态文明建设农民满意度分析[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(4):52-57.
    [22] 邓维斌,周玉敏,刘进,等.SPSS23(中文版)统计分析实用教程[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2017.
    [23] 吴云青,张再生,蔡为民.城乡建设用地增减挂钩区农户满意度的IPA分析:以天津市华明镇为例[J].东北大学学报:社会科学版,2013,15(2):175-181.
    [24] 蔡彩云,骆培聪,唐承财,等.基于IPA法的民居类世界遗产地游客满意度评价[J].资源科学,2011,33(7):1374-1381.
    [25] 王钦安,彭建,孙根年.基于IPA法的传统型景区游客满意度评价[J].地域研究与开发,2017,36(4):110-115.
    [26] 方凯,王厚俊.基于因子分析的农村公共品农民满意度评价研究[J].农业技术经济,2012(6):30-36.
    [27] 卢松,吴霞.古村落旅游地写生游客满意度评价[J].地理研究,2017,36(8):1570-1582.
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

张锐,邹露,胡锋,郑华伟.农用地整治项目农户满意度分析[J].水土保持通报英文版,2018,38(4):350-356

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1072
  • PDF: 1082
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:May 12,2018
  • Revised:May 17,2018
  • Online: September 18,2018