Optimization of Ecological Land Conservation Pattern in Fuzhou City
Author:
Clc Number:

F293.2

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [16]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • |
  • Cited by [2]
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] This paper studid the optimization of protecting the ecological land in a rational way in order to provide a scientific solution to the conflict between urban expansion and natural environment.[Methods] Fuzhou City was selected as the study area, this paper extracted the core ecological land through ecological importance comprehensive evaluation, then ecological land conservation zone was identified by utilizing the methodology of ecological security patterns. The conservation zone scheme was collated with the ecological protection red line which is currently administrated by the department of environment.[Results] The land cover type of the core ecological land in Fuzhou City was predominantly consist of forest and water area, and its spatial distribution emerged as a coast-inland pattern. In comparision with the ecological protection red line, the ecological land conservation zone had the advantage in the degree of landscape fragmentation and aggregation, and also with a better overall landscape connectivity.[Conclusion] Ecosystem services and ecological process would be more abundant and effective under the scenario of ecological land conservation zone. The method and conclusion from this example could not only supplement the technological process of the ecological protection red line but also improve its practicality, which is an efficient way of optimizing the ecological land protection and achieving government's goal.

    Reference
    [1] Meadows D H, Meadows D L, Randers J. Beyond the limits:Global collapse or a sustainable future[J]. International Affairs, 1992,68(4):749.
    [2] 谭永忠,赵越,曹宇,等.中国区域生态用地分类的研究进展[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(9):28-36.
    [3] Seppelt R, Voinov A. Optimization methodology for land use patterns using spatially explicit landscape models[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2002,151(2):125-142.
    [4] 杨伟州,邱硕,付喜厅,等.河北省生态功能区划研究[J].水土保持研究, 2016, 23(4):269-276.
    [5] 郑华,欧阳志云.生态红线的实践与思考[J].中国科学院院刊,2014,1(4):457-461.
    [6] 黄秋昊,蔡运龙.国内几种土地利用变化模型述评[J].中国土地科学,2005,19(5):25-30.
    [7] 贵立德.兰州市城镇化水平与其生态用地的供求关系[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(4):298-302.
    [8] 张颖,王群,李边疆,等.应用碳氧平衡法测算生态用地需求量实证研究[J].中国土地科学,2007,21(6):23-28.
    [9] 周朕,蒙吉军.基于改进生态足迹模型与生态重要性识别的最小生态用地优化:黑河中游案例研究[J].干旱区地理:汉文版,2016,39(3):513-520.
    [10] Yu Kongjian. Security patterns and surface model in landscape ecological planning[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 1996,36(1):1-17.
    [11] 李国煜,林丽群,伍世代,等.生态源地识别与生态安全格局构建研究:以福建省福清市为例[J].地域研究与开发,2018,37(3):120-125.
    [12] 彭建,郭小楠,胡熠娜,等.基于地质灾害敏感性的山地生态安全格局构建:以云南省玉溪市为例[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(2):627-635.
    [13] 闫玉玉,曹宇,谭永忠.基于景观安全格局的县域生态用地保护研究:以浙江省青田县为例[J].中国土地科学, 2016, 30(11):78-85.
    [14] 刘德林,方炫,李壁成.黄土高原小流域尺度土地利用景观格局指数的粒度效应[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(4):206-210.
    [15] Carranza M L, Saura S, Loy A. Connectivity providers for semi-aquatic vertebrates:The case of the endangered otter in Italy[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2012,27(2):281-290.
    [16] 郭程轩,徐颂军,巫细波.佛山市景观格局变化及其动力梯度分析[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(1):238-243.
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

李国煜,林丽群,罗栋燊,王强.福州市生态用地保护格局的优化途径[J].水土保持通报英文版,2019,39(2):234-241

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1174
  • PDF: 1057
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:September 06,2018
  • Revised:November 05,2018
  • Online: May 10,2019