Response of Seed Germination of Artemisia Desertorum to NaCl and Polyethylene Glycol Stress
Author:
Clc Number:

Q945

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [42]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The germination ability of Artemisia desertorum seeds under salt and drought stress was investigated to provide a reference for artificial cultivation and planting of A. desertorum.[Methods] Using A. desertorum seeds as experimental materials, different concentrations of NaCl solutions (0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%, 1.0%, 1.2%, 1.4%, 1.6%, and 1.8%) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25%) were applied to simulate salinity and drought stress conditions on seeds. The germination rate, germination potential, germination index, and vigor index were measured in the early stage of seed germination.[Results] When the NaCl concentration was ≤ 0.6%, the above-mentioned indices did not change significantly compared with the control group. However, when the solution concentration was higher than this range, the indices decreased significantly with the increase in concentration. The NaCl solution concentration of 0.6% was the most suitable concentration limit for normal seed germination. When the PEG concentration was ≤ 15%, the above indices of A. desertorum seeds did not change significantly compared with the control group. However, when the PEG concentration was higher than 15%, the seed indices decreased significantly compared with the control group. The PEG concentration of 15% was the most suitable concentration limit for normal germination.[Conclusion] A. desertorum seeds showed tolerance to mild and moderate salt and drought stress and could still grow normally in low salt content soil and mild and moderate drought environments.

    Reference
    [1] 胡小文,王彦荣,武艳培.荒漠草原植物抗旱生理生态学研究进展[J].草业学报,2004,13(3):9-15.
    [2] 燕辉.西北旱区两种典型沙生植物对盐胁迫响应的研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.
    [3] 郭世乾,崔增团,傅亲民.甘肃省盐碱地现状及治理思路与建议[J].中国农业资源与区划,2013,34(4):75-79.
    [4] 刘玉艳,于凤鸣,曹慧颖,等.盐胁迫对紫花地丁植株生长及生理特性的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2011,26(3):36-40.
    [5] Zhao Kefu, Song Jie, Feng Gu, et al. Erratum to:Species, types, distribution, and economic potential of halophytes in China[J]. Plant and Soil, 2011,342(1/2):511-526.
    [6] 刘敦华.沙蒿籽胶性质、结构及应用的研究[D].江苏无锡:江南大学,2006.
    [7] 赵振勇,张科,王雷,等.盐生植物对重盐渍土脱盐效果[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(5):1420-1425.
    [8] 王赞,李源,吴欣明,等. PEG渗透胁迫下鸭茅种子萌发特性及抗旱性鉴定[J].中国草地学报,2008,30(1):50-55.
    [9] 霍平慧,李剑峰,师尚礼,等.碱性盐胁迫对超干贮藏苜蓿种子幼苗生长及抗性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(13):2643-2651.
    [10] 张翠梅,师尚礼,吴芳.干旱胁迫对不同抗旱性苜蓿品种根系生长及生理特性影响[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(5):868-882.
    [11] Osmolovskaya N, Shumilina J, Kim A, et al. Methodology of drought stress research:Experimental setup and physiological characterization[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2018,19(12):40-89.
    [12] 赵波,杨秀云,沈向群. PEG与低温对法国百里香种子萌发的影响[J].草业科学,2015,32(11):1808-1814.
    [13] Utkhao W, Yingjajaval S. Changes in leaf gas exchange and biomass of Eucalyptus camaldulensis in response to increasing drought stress induced by polyethylene glycol[J]. Trees, 2015,29(5):1581-1592.
    [14] 陆嘉惠,吕新,吴玲,等.3种药用甘草种子对盐渍环境的萌发响应及其适宜生态种植区[J].草业学报,2013,22(2):195-202.
    [15] 宗莉,甘霖,康玉茹,等.盐分、干旱及其交互胁迫对黑果枸杞发芽的影响[J].干旱区研究,2015,32(3):499-503.
    [16] Li Qian, Yang An, Zhang Wenhao. Comparative studies on tolerance of rice genotypes differing in their tolerance to moderate salt stress[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2017,17(1):141.
    [17] Liu Jie, Bai Bing, Zhao Shengliang, et al. Comparison of the effects of salt stress and salt-alkaline mixed stress on the mineral nutrition of sunflower[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2012,43(15):1963-1975.
    [18] 马彦军,段慧荣,曹致中,等.沙冬青种子萌发期抗逆性研究[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(4):963-967.
    [19] 张强,刘静,李强,等.黑沙蒿与粉土质砂根-土及土-土界面摩阻特性[J].西北农业学报,2019,28(3):489-496.
    [20] 赵丽,孙超,刘春,等.小叶杨、沙蒿、沙柳和毛白杨落叶溶解性有机质的紫外与荧光性质对比研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(6):179-184.
    [21] 董金伟,李宜坪,李新凯,等.毛乌素沙地植被类型对生物结皮及其下伏土壤养分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):112-117.
    [22] 韩文娟,王铁娟,玉昉永.5种蒿属沙生半灌木种子萌发耐旱性研究[J].种子,2015,34(2):42-45.
    [23] 回振龙,李自龙,刘文瑜,等.黄腐酸浸种对PEG模拟干旱胁迫下紫花苜蓿种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].西北植物学报,2013,33(8):1621-1629.
    [24] 孙时轩.造林学[M].2版.北京:中国林业出版社,1992.
    [25] Michel B E, Kaufmann M R. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000[J]. Plant Physiology, 1973,51(5):914-916.
    [26] 国际种子检验协会(ISTA).国际种子检验规程:1976[M].修订本.颜启博,毕辛华,译.北京:技术标准出版社,1980:145-183.
    [27] 周劲松,罗绍春,汤泳萍,等.芦笋种子发芽率、发芽势测定及多胚现象观察[J].江西农业学报,2014,26(4):30-32.
    [28] 李振,廖同庆,冯青春,等.基于机器视觉的蔬菜种子活力指数检测算法研究及系统实现[J].浙江农业学报,2015,27(12):2218-2224.
    [29] 蒋敏明.种子活力研究进展及展望[J].中国种业,2018(6):15-18.
    [30] 杨佳鑫,李庆卫,刘玉霞,等. NaCl胁迫对梅花和山桃种子萌发及生理特性的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2018,33(2):94-99.
    [31] 张苏江,张玲,江承凤,等.复合盐浓度对4种牧草种子萌发的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2005(6):106-108.
    [32] 马琳,李红丽,董智,等.不同浓度NaCl盐处理对4种牧草种子萌发和生长的影响[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2009,30(2):125-130.
    [33] 刘克彪,姜生秀.干旱和钠盐胁迫对罗布麻种子萌发的影响[J].草业学报,2016,25(5):214-221.
    [34] 朱金方,刘京涛,陆兆华,等.盐胁迫对中国柽柳幼苗生理特性的影响[J].生态学报,2015,35(15):5140-5146.
    [35] 程波,胡生荣,高永,等. PEG模拟干旱胁迫下5种紫花苜蓿萌发期抗旱性的评估[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(1):53-59.
    [36] 史薇,徐海量,赵新风,等.胀果甘草种子萌发对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J].生态学报,2010,30(8):2112-2117.
    [37] 李志萍,张文辉,崔豫川. PEG模拟干旱胁迫对栓皮栎种子萌发及生长生理的影响[J].西北植物学报,2013,33(10):2043-2049.
    [38] 孙艳茹,石屹,陈国军,等. PEG模拟干旱胁迫下8种绿肥作物萌发特性与抗旱性评价[J].草业学报,2015,24(3):89-98.
    [39] 杨景宁,王彦荣. PEG模拟干旱胁迫对4种荒漠植物种子萌发的影响[J].草业学报,2012,21(6):23-29.
    [40] 姜生秀,严子柱,吴昊. PEG6000模拟干旱胁迫对2种沙冬青种子萌发的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2018,33(5):130-136.
    [41] 乔枫,耿贵工.盐碱胁迫对沙棘种子萌发及幼苗抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2012,40(2):17-19.
    [42] 刘帅,付和平,蓝登明,等.3种柽柳属植物种子萌发特性研究[J].安徽农业科学,2017,45(11):130-132.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

陈东凯,骆汉,马瑞,谢永生,段洁.沙蒿种子萌发对NaCl及聚乙二醇胁迫的响应[J].水土保持通报英文版,2021,41(1):161-166

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:549
  • PDF: 1114
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:October 15,2020
  • Revised:November 06,2020
  • Online: March 16,2021