Effects of Vegetation Restoration Methods on Soil Particle Size Characteristics in Loess Region of Southern Ningxia
Author:
Clc Number:

S152.3

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [26]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] In order to provide a scientific basis for more effectively guiding the sustainable development of soil resources and ecological environmental protection in the loess region of Southern Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, soil particle size characteristics under different vegetation recovery patterns were studied.[Methods] Field standardized soil samples (0-100 cm) were collected, and 216 samples from nine different vegetation restoration methods (Prunus armeniaca forest, Amygdalus davidiana forest, Hippophae rhamnoides forest, Caragana korshinskii forest, C. korshinskii×P. armeniaca forest, P. armeniaca×H. rhamnoides forest, dam land, alfalfa land, and abandoned land) were measured with a Mastersizer 3000 laser particle size analyzer. The average particle size (MZ), standard deviation (δ), skewness (SK), and kurtosis (KG) were calculated by the Fokker and Ward formula.[Results] ① Under different vegetation recovery patterns, the main particle size components were silt (0.002~0.05 mm) and very fine sand (0.05~0.1 mm), and the proportion of silt content in each particle size classification was the largest. The contents of clay, coarse sand, very coarse sand, and medium sand in different vegetation restoration methods tended to be stable, and changed little with increasing soil depth. The content of silt, very fine sand, and fine sand fluctuated greatly with increasing soil depth, and each layer showed different trends. ② The variation of the coefficient of variation of each particle size was basically the same under different vegetation restoration methods. The coefficient of variation of clay was the highest, followed by sand and silt. ③ The average soil particle size followed the order of P. armeniaca×C. korshinskii forest > H. rhamnoides forest > A. davidiana forest > C. korshinskii forest > P. armeniaca forest > alfalfa land > P. armeniaca×H. rhamnoides forest > abandoned land > dam land. The sorting ability of abandoned land, A. davidiana forest, and C. korshinskii forest was better than that of other sites, with H. rhamnoides forest being the worst.[Conclusion] Soil particle size distribution in different vegetation restoration methods was mainly affected by utilization mode, vegetation type, and human activity disturbance.

    Reference
    [1] 李秀彬.全球环境变化研究的核心领域:土地利用/土地覆被变化的国际研究动向[J].地理学报, 1996, 51(6):553-558.
    [2] 唐克丽.土壤侵蚀环境演变与全球变化及防灾减灾的机制[J].土壤与环境, 1999, 8(2):81-86.
    [3] 龚子同, 陈鸿昭, 骆国保.人为作用对土壤环境质量的影响及对策[J].土壤与环境, 2000(1):7-10.
    [4] 张雪琪, 崔东, 夏振华, 等.伊犁河谷不同土地利用方式下土壤粒度特征[J].水土保持研究, 2017, 24(5):162-167.
    [5] 徐国策, 李占斌, 李鹏, 等.丹江中游典型小流域土壤颗粒及分形特征[J].中国水土保持科学, 2013, 11(5):28-35.
    [6] 郭伟, 张鸾, 刘爽, 等.晋北风沙区人工林土壤水分及粒度特征[J].中国水土保持科学, 2018, 16(2):80-87.
    [7] 毛丽, 苏志珠, 王国玲, 等.毛乌素沙地不同土地利用类型的土壤粒度及有机质特征[J].干旱区研究, 2019, 36(3):589-598.
    [8] 王根绪, 马海燕, 王一博, 等.黑河流域中游土地利用变化的环境影响[J].冰川冻土, 2003, 25(4):359-367.
    [9] 许文强, 罗格平, 陈曦, 等.干旱区绿洲不同土地利用方式和强度对土壤粒度分布的影响[J].干旱区地理, 2005, 28(6):800-804.
    [10] 王英芹, 李林立, 张海, 等.岩溶高山区不同土地利用类型土壤粒度特征[J].人民长江, 2009, 40(3):29-30, 34.
    [11] 张小萌, 李艳红, 赵明亮.干旱区不同植物群落下土壤粒度特征研究[J].广东农业科学, 2015, 42(21):45-49.
    [12] 袁杰, 曹广超, 鄂崇毅, 等.环青海湖表层土壤沉积物粒度分布特征及其指示意义[J].水土保持研究, 2015, 22(3):150-154.
    [13] 闫玉春, 唐海萍, 张新时, 等.基于土壤粒度分析的草原风蚀特征探讨[J].中国沙漠, 2010, 30(6):1263-1268.
    [14] 张正偲, 董治宝.土壤风蚀对表层土壤粒度特征的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(12):86-89.
    [15] 张彩云, 庞奖励, 常美蓉, 等.农业耕作土壤与人工经济林地土壤磁化率和质地特征对比[J].农业系统科学与综合研究, 2009, 25(1):91-94.
    [16] 周群英, 黄春长, 庞奖励.泾河上游黄土高原全新世成壤环境演变与人类活动影响[J].干旱区地理, 2004, 27(2):142-147.
    [17] 阿依图尔荪·哈力穆拉提, 玉素甫江·买买提, 买合皮热提·吾拉木.渭干河-库车河三角洲绿洲植棉土壤的粒度分布特征[J].安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(23):9580-9582, 9630.
    [18] 吴美榕, 李志忠, 靳建辉, 等.新疆伊犁河谷新垦荒地土壤粒度特征[J].河北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(2):211-216.
    [19] 杨志勇, 陈新闯, 郭建英, 等.乌兰布和沙漠不同土地利用类型粒度特征分析[J].中国水土保持, 2015(7):50-53.
    [20] 唐艳, 刘连友, 杨志鹏, 等.毛乌素沙地南缘灌丛沙丘土壤水分与粒度特征研究[J].水土保持研究, 2009, 16(2):6-9.
    [21] 李占宏, 海春兴, 丛艳静.毛乌素沙地表土粒度特征及其空间变异[J].中国水土保持科学, 2009, 7(2):74-79, 92.
    [22] 陈国靖, 蔡进军, 马璠, 等.宁夏黄土丘陵区典型林草植被类型对土壤水稳性团聚体的影响[J].水土保持研究, 2018, 25(05):49-53+60.
    [23] 袁杰, 曹生奎, 曹广超, 等.祁连山南坡不同植被类型土壤粒度特征[J].水土保持通报, 2019, 39(2):76-82.
    [24] 苏永中, 赵哈林.科尔沁沙地不同土地利用和管理方式对土壤质量性状的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2003, 14(10):1681-1686.
    [25] 王惠泽, 孙虎.秦岭南麓小流域不同土地利用类型剖面粒度分析[J].河南科学, 2016, 34(12):2118-2123.
    [26] 常美蓉, 庞奖励, 张彩云, 等.关中东部不同土地利用方式对土壤质地影响探讨[J].农业系统科学与综合研究, 2009, 25(1):50-53.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

王月玲,王思成,许浩,万海霞,董立国,韩新生,郭永忠,魏永东.宁南黄土区植被恢复方式对土壤粒度特征的影响[J].水土保持通报英文版,2021,41(5):83-91

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:313
  • PDF: 883
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:April 22,2021
  • Revised:June 04,2021
  • Online: October 25,2021