Landscape Pattern Change and Its Response to Ecosystem Services Value in a Rural Tourism Area—A Case Study at Taihu National Tourism Resort in Wuxi City of Jiangsu Province
Author:
Clc Number:

F301.2;X171.1

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [28]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The evolution process of rural landscape tourism patterns and the response of ecosystem services value were studied in order to provide a scientific basis for the rational planning of rural landscape resources.[Methods] Five remote sensing images of Mashan Peninsula, Taihu Lake National Tourism Resort in Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province from 1984 to 2020 were selected for landscape classification. Land use dynamic degree, transfer matrix, and landscape pattern indexes were calculated. The ecosystem services value (ESV) was evaluated based on the equivalent factor method. The coefficient of sensitivity for each landscape type was calculated. Additionally, correlation analysis and regression analysis between ESV and landscape pattern indexes were carried out using SPSS.[Results] ① From 1984 to 2020, the landscape pattern of Mashan Peninsula changed significantly, and the various types of landscape changed frequently. The area of construction land and shrubs and grass increased over time. In contrast, the area of broad-leaved forest land, bodies of water, bare land, and other land decreased. The landscape patterns tended to be fragmented and complicated, and connectivity weakened over time. ② Mashan Peninsula water system and broad-leaved forest land had the largest proportion of ESV, and contributed the most to regional ESV. ESV declined over time, with a cumulative reduction of 7.08×105 yuan. The value of each individual ecosystem service decreased, and the reduction in value of regulating service was the most significant. ③ ESV was strongly correlated with the landscape pattern index in Mashan Peninsula, but the degree of influence for each index was different.[Conclusion] With the development of tourism, the landscape pattern and ESV of Mashan Peninsula have changed significantly, and the correlation between the two was significant. Ecosystem service benefits can be improved by adjusting key landscape pattern characteristics.

    Reference
    [1] 甄霖, 刘雪林, 李芬, 等.脆弱生态区生态系统服务消费与生态补偿研究:进展与挑战[J].资源科学, 2010, 32(5):797-803.
    [2] 汪洪旭.农业旅游开发对内蒙呼伦贝尔草原生态环境的影响[J].水土保持研究, 2015, 22(2):290-294.
    [3] 朱芳, 白卓灵, 陈耿, 等.旅游活动对武当山风景区生态环境的影响[J].林业资源管理, 2015(3):89-95.
    [4] Forman R, Godron M. Landscape Ecology[M]. New York:Wiley, 1986.
    [5] 邬建国.景观生态学:格局、过程、尺度与等级[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2007.
    [6] 李桢, 刘淼, 薛振山, 等.基于CLUE-S模型的三江平原景观格局变化及模拟[J].应用生态学报, 2018, 29(6):1805-1812.
    [7] 张飞, 塔西甫拉提·特依拜, 曹鑫, 等.干旱区内陆艾比湖流域景观格局时空变化及生态安全评价[J].水土保持通报, 2015, 35(1):249-255, 363.
    [8] 范雅双, 于婉晴, 张婧, 等.太湖上游水源区河流水质对景观格局变化的响应关系:以东苕溪上游为例[J].湖泊科学, 2021, 33(5):1478-1489.
    [9] 陈羚, 陈锋, 牛树奎, 等.北京鹫峰景观格局空间特征与森林火险的关联分析[J].北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(6):41-49.
    [10] 刘颂, 戴常文.自然资本流变及其对生态系统服务价值的演变路径[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(3):1189-1198.
    [11] 刘文平, 宇振荣.景观服务研究进展[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(22):7058-7066.
    [12] Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630):253-260.
    [13] Daily G C. Nature's services:Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M]. Washington DC:Island Press, 1997.
    [14] 吴攀, 杨木壮, 刘伟聪.2007-2015年东莞市土地利用及其生态系统服务价值的时空演变[J].水土保持通报, 2020, 40(1):250-255.
    [15] 王航, 秦奋, 朱筠, 等.土地利用及景观格局演变对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(4):1286-1296.
    [16] 杨雪婷, 邱孝枰, 徐云, 等.典型山区生态系统服务对居民福祉影响的空间差异及其动态特征研究:以川西山区为例[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(19).DOI:10.5846/stxb202005261347.
    [17] 欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报, 1999, 19(5):19-25.
    [18] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2):189-196.
    [19] 陈婧祎, 罗红霞, 胡林利, 等.生态系统服务价值与社会经济相关性研究:以重庆市大都市区为例[J].水土保持研究, 2017, 24(4):330-336.
    [20] 马琳, 刘浩, 彭建, 等.生态系统服务供给和需求研究进展[J].地理学报, 2017, 72(7):1277-1289.
    [21] 曹君, 张正栋, 陈宋佳, 等.1996-2015年粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务对景观格局变化的响应[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 52(5):93-105.
    [22] 陈明叶, 刘素红, 于连海, 等.大清河阜平流域生态系统结构变化的服务价值响应研究[J].自然资源学报, 2018, 33(8):1376-1389.
    [23] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8):1243-1254.
    [24] 董光, 何兰, 王艺积, 等.1990-2017年河北省易县土地利用时空格局动态变化[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(1):242-249.
    [25] Wang Jieyong, Liu Yansui, Liu Zhigao. Spatio-temporal patterns of cropland conversion in response to the "grain for green project" in China's loess hilly region of Yanchuan County[J]. Remote Sensing, 2013, 5(11):5642-5661.
    [26] 王雅敬, 谢炳庚, 苏维词, 等.贵州省玉屏县土地利用格局时空变化对生态服务价值的影响[J].水土保持研究, 2016, 23(3):180-184.
    [27] 师满江, 颉耀文, 曹琦.干旱区绿洲农村居民点景观格局演变及机制分析[J].地理研究, 2016, 35(4):692-702.
    [28] 张文彤.SPSS统计分析高级教程[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2004.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

柳迪子,杜守帅,王晨旭.旅游型乡村景观格局变化及生态系统服务价值响应——以江苏省无锡市太湖国家旅游度假区为例[J].水土保持通报英文版,2021,41(5):264-275,286

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:397
  • PDF: 1114
  • HTML: 1115
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:June 28,2021
  • Revised:August 25,2021
  • Online: October 25,2021