Evolution of Ecological Environmental Quality in Feldspathic Sandstone Area Based on RSEI Model
Author:
Clc Number:

F301.23

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [24]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • |
  • Cited by [1]
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The ecological environmental quality of a feldspathic sandstone area was investigated in order to provide a scientific basis for local ecological environmental management. [Methods] The spatial-temporal evolution of ecological environmental quality in a feldspathic sandstone area was analyzed using GIS and remote sensing technology, and a remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) model. [Results] ① RSEI extracted from the four-stage imaged data of a feldspathic sandstone area showed a trend of initially decreasing and then increasing, indicating that the ecological environmental quality was slowly improving. ② Greenness ecological index and humidity ecological index were positively related to ecological environmental quality in a feldspathic sandstone area, while dryness ecological index and heat ecological index were negatively related. Greenness ecological index had a higher contribution rate to ecological environmental quality improvement. ③ From 2001 to 2020, 36.79% of the total study area improved in ecological environmental quality. Over that same period, 15.68% of the total area deteriorated in ecological environmental quality, and the ecological degradation area was mostly classified as mild degradation. [Conclusion] The ecological environmental quality of a feldspathic sandstone area increased from 2001 to 2020. Ecological environmental quality was highly sensitive to human activities. The concept of ecological protection should be integrated into management practices to improve the ecological environment in order to achieve harmonious coexistence between man and nature.

    Reference
    [1] 杨振奇,秦富仓,李龙,等.砒砂岩区小流域土壤有机质空间分布特征及其影响因素[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(17):154-161.
    [2] 杨玉春.砒砂岩区土壤侵蚀强度时空变异特征[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2020.
    [3] 白雪莲,郑海颖,王理想,等.砒砂岩黄土区植被盖度对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(11):3776-3784.
    [4] 石迎春,叶浩,侯宏冰,等.内蒙古南部砒砂岩侵蚀内因分析[J].地球学报,2004,25(6):659-664.
    [5] 张攀,姚文艺,刘国彬,等.土壤复合侵蚀研究进展与展望[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(24):154-161.
    [6] 杨江燕,吴田,潘肖燕,等.基于遥感生态指数的雄安新区生态质量评估[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(1):277-284.
    [7] Hang Xin, Li Yachun, Luo Xiaochun, et al. Assessing the ecological quality of Nanjing during its urbanization process by using satellite, meteorological, and socioeconomic data[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2020,34(2):280-293.
    [8] 马广文,何立环,李宝林,等.基于多时相遥感数据的典型区生态格局变化分析[J].中国环境监测,2021,37(5):185-193.
    [9] 国家环境保护总局.生态环境状况评价技术规范(试行) HJ/T192-2006[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2006.
    [10] 岳昂,张赞.基于EI值的生态状况变化分析研究[J].绿色科技,2018(14):182-184.
    [11] 徐涵秋.区域生态环境变化的遥感评价指数[J].中国环境科学,2013,33(5):889-897.
    [12] 徐涵秋.城市遥感生态指数的创建及其应用[J].生态学报,2013,33(24):7853-7862.
    [13] 木哈代思·艾日肯,张飞,刘康,等.基于天宫二号及Landsat8城镇生态环境现状评价[J].国土资源遥感,2020,32(4):209-218.
    [14] 何盈利,尤南山,崔耀平,等.2000年来中国生态状况时空变化格局[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(5):1176-1185.
    [15] 刘索玄,袁艳斌,赵皞,等.基于遥感生态指数(RSEI)的水电开发区生态环境变化分析:以清江中下游地区为例[J].生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(11):1361-1368.
    [16] 李冠稳,高晓奇,肖能文.基于关键指标的黄河流域近20年生态系统质量的时空变化[J].环境科学研究,2021,34(12):2945-2953.
    [17] Goward S N, Xue Yongkang, Czajkowski K P. Evaluating land surface moisture conditions from the remotely sensed temperature/vegetation index measurements[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002,79(2):225-242.
    [18] 黄苍平.厦门市同安区土地利用变化与生态安全格局研究[D].广东广州:中国科学院大学(中国科学院广州地球化学研究所),2018.
    [19] 吴志杰,赵书河.基于TM图像的"增强的指数型建筑用地指数"研究[J].国土资源遥感,2012,93(2):50-55.
    [20] 彭擎,王让会,蒋烨林,等.植被-地温指数(NDVI-LST)在新疆干旱监测中的适用性[J].生态学报,2018,38(13):4694-4703.
    [21] 占昕,潘文斌,郑鹏,等.闽江河口湿地自然保护区及其周边区域景观自然性评价[J].生态学报,2017,37(20):6895-6904.
    [22] 农兰萍,王金亮.基于RSEI模型的昆明市生态环境质量动态监测[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(6):2042-2050.
    [23] 陈晓辉,曾晓莹,赵超超,等.基于遥感生态指数的道路网络生态效应分析:以福州市为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(12):4732-4745.
    [24] 王丽春,焦黎,来风兵,等.基于遥感生态指数的新疆玛纳斯湖湿地生态变化评价[J].生态学报,2019,39(8):2963-2972.
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

刘林甫,盛艳,秦富仓,李龙,李艳.基于RSEI模型的砒砂岩区生态环境质量演变研究[J].水土保持通报英文版,2022,42(1):233-239,334

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:160
  • PDF: 606
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:August 02,2021
  • Revised:October 05,2021
  • Online: March 12,2022