Relationship Between Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Vegetation Coverage and Topographic Factors in Fenhe River Basin
Author:
Clc Number:

P463.22;TP79

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [18]
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The spatiotemporal variation characteristics of vegetation coverage in Fenhe River basin and their relationship with topographic factors were studied in order to provide a scientific basis for the green development of the basin. [Methods] Based on MODIS NDVI remote sensing images data, five years (2005, 2009, 2013, 2017 and 2020) of data for the Fenhe River basin from 2005 to 2020 were selected. A pixel dichotomy model was used to estimate the vegetation coverage of Fenhe River basin over the past 15 years. The spatio-temporal variation characteristics of vegetation coverage in Fenhe River basin were studied combined with linear trend analysis. Associated with DEM data, the relationship between vegetation coverage and topographic factors was discussed. [Results] The vegetation coverage of Fenhe River basin demonstrated an increasing trend from 2005 to 2020, with an average of more than 60%, mainly medium, medium-high, and high vegetation coverage. The vegetation coverage along the Lüliang Mountains and Taihang Mountains was in good condition. The impact of topographic factors on vegetation coverage could be summarized as: ① Vegetation coverage in Fenhe River basin increased continuously with increasing vegetation, and was greatest in areas higher than 2 000 m in elevation. ② Vegetation coverage in Fenhe River basin increased with increasing slope, and the coverage reached maximum values in areas with slopes greater than 12°. ③ There was little correlation between slope aspect and vegetation coverage in Fenhe River basin. Changes in vegetation coverage showed a gentle trend, but coverage was higher on shady slopes. [Conclusion] Vegetation coverage in Fenhe River basin is good, and vegetation growth is getting better year by year. Topography is an important factor affecting vegetation growth.

    Reference
    [1] 李茂华,郭松.涑水河流域1990-2011年植被覆盖度变化研究[J].地理空间信息,2018,16(7):104-107,116.
    [2] 汤巧英,戚德辉,宋立旺,等.基于GIS和RS的延河流域植被覆盖度与地形因子的相关性研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):198-203.
    [3] Liu Qinping, Yang Yongchun, Tian Hongzhen, et al. Spatial-temporal difference of vegetation changes in Built-up areas in China during the period of rapid urbanization[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014,29(2):223-236.
    [4] Anatoly A G, Yoram J K, Robert S, et al. Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002,80(1):76-87.
    [5] 白建伟.汾河流域近17年植被覆盖度时空特征变化研究[D].山西晋中:山西农业大学,2019.
    [6] 韩丽君,李晶.近10年汾河流域植被覆盖时空变化研究[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,48(6):824-831.
    [7] 孙天瑶,李雪梅,许民,等.2000-2018年塔里木河流域植被覆盖时空格局[J].干旱区地理,2020,43(2):415-424.
    [8] 齐敬辉,牛叔文,马利邦,等.2000-2014年疏勒河流域植被覆盖时空变化[J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(5):757-766.
    [9] 李晓蕾,徐丽萍,位宏,等.叶尔羌河流域植被覆盖度时空变化分析[J].西部林业科学,2019,48(4):86-93.
    [10] 岳强,翟鹏芳.汾河生态保护与流域高质量发展的关联特征:基于河流沿线城市数据的实证研究[J].山西师大学报(社会科学版):2021,48(3)98-106.
    [11] 张韵婕,桂朝,刘庆生,等.基于遥感和气象数据的蒙古高原1982-2013年植被动态变化分析[J].遥感技术与应用,2016,31(5):1022-1030.
    [12] 徐勇,奚砚涛,刘欣婷.2000-2013年江苏省植被覆盖度时空变化特征[J].西南农业学报,2016,29(2):437-444.
    [13] 孟浩斌,周启刚,李明慧,等.基于MODIS像元尺度的三峡库区植被覆盖度变化的地形分布特征[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(8):1790-1799.
    [14] 蔡宏,何政伟,安艳玲,等.基于RS和GIS的赤水河流域植被覆盖度与各地形因子的相关强度研究[J].地球与环境,2014,42(4):518-524.
    [15] 田地,刘政,胡亚林.福州市植被覆盖度时空特征及与地形因子的关系[J].浙江农林大学学报,2019,36(6):1158-1165.
    [16] 陈家良,夏建国,余雨红.基于RS和GIS的雅安市植被覆盖度与地形因子相关分析[J].安徽农业科学,2020,48(5):88-92.
    [17] 熊俊楠,张昊,彭超,等.汶川地震灾区植被覆盖度变化与地形因子的关系[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(3):24-31,37.
    [18] 张诗羽,张毅,王昌全,等.岷江上游流域植被覆盖度及其与地形因子的相关性[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(1):69-75.
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

张会霞,李永梅,张娜.汾河流域植被覆盖度时空特征与地形因子的关系[J].水土保持通报英文版,2022,42(1):353-359,368

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:June 28,2021
  • Revised:August 23,2021
  • Online: March 12,2022