Effects of Biocrusts on Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Slope Flow in Hilly Regions of Loess Plateau
Author:
Clc Number:

S157.1

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [28]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The effects of biological soil crusts (biocrusts) on the hydrodynamic characteristics of slope flow were investigated in order to provide theoretical guidance for the study of biocrusts anti-erosive mechanism in hilly regions of the Loess Plateau. [Methods] The treatments of biocrusts coverage and destruction were set, and the artificial rainfall simulation experiments were conducted in this study. [Results] ① The slope flow of biocrusts coverage and destruction treatments was the laminar jet stream. ②The biocrusts coverage significantly reduced slope velocity, whereas increased shear stress, resistance coefficient, and stream power (p<0.05). Compared with the bare land, the slope velocity of algal crust and moss crust treatment decreased by 48.74% and 62.24%. The shear force, resistance coefficient, and stream power increased by 130.01% and 308.07%, 703.35% and 2532.01%, 21.16% and 57.43%, respectively. ③ Compared with the bare land, the resistance coefficient was no significant difference after the biocrusts were destroyed, whereas the flow velocity, shear stress, and stream power were significantly higher than the bare land (p<0.05). The slope velocity, shear stress, and stream power of the algae crust and moss crust treatments increased by 10.84% and 16.46%, 36.8% and 42.44%, 60.8 and 62.14%, respectively. [Conclusion] The biocrusts coverage increased slope flow resistance coefficient and decreased flow velocity. After the biocrusts were destroyed, the slope flow resistance coefficient was no different from the bare land, but the flow velocity increased. Furthermore, the biocrusts coverage and destruction treatment increased shear force and stream power of the slope flow, thereby increasing the runoff erosion energy.

    Reference
    [1] Belnap J, Lange O L. Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management [M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2003.
    [2] 张元明.荒漠地表生物土壤结皮的微结构及其早期发育特征[J].科学通报,2005,50(1):42-47.
    [3] 赵允格,许明祥,王全九,等.黄土丘陵区退耕地生物结皮对土壤理化性状的影响[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(3):441-448.
    [4] Zhao Yunge, Xu Mingxiang. Runoff and soil loss from revegetated grasslands in the Hilly Loess Plateau Region, China: Influence of biocrust patches and plant canopies [J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2013,18(4):387-393.
    [5] 张宝琦.生物结皮覆盖对坡面产流产沙过程的影响[D].陕西 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021.
    [6] 张培培,赵允格,王媛,等.黄土高原丘陵区生物结皮土壤的斥水性[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(3):657-663.
    [7] 李林,赵允格,王一贺,等.不同类型生物结皮对坡面产流特征的影响[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(6):1013-1023.
    [8] 吉静怡,赵允格,杨凯,等.生物结皮分布格局对坡面流水动力特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(3):1015-1022.
    [9] 秦宁强.黄土丘陵区生物土壤结皮对降雨侵蚀力的响应及影响[D].陕西 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.
    [10] 王雪芹,张元明,张伟民,等.生物结皮粗糙特征:以古尔班通古特沙漠为例[J].生态学报,2011,31(14):4153-4160.
    [11] 李新凯,卜崇峰,李宜坪,等.放牧干扰背景下藓结皮对毛乌素沙地土壤水分与风蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):22-28.
    [12] 李盼盼,李彬彬,王兵,等.模拟氮沉降对白羊草地群落特征及其坡面流水动力特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(16):52-61.
    [13] Wang Bing, Zhang Guanghui, Zhang X C, et al. Effects of near soil surface characteristics on soil detachment by overland flow in a natural succession grassland [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2014,78(2):589-597.
    [14] 许欢欢,张宝琦,汪建芳,等.黄土高原典型生物结皮对坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(6):8-13.
    [15] 李宁宁,张光辉,王浩,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区生物结皮对土壤抗蚀性能的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2020,18(1):42-48.
    [16] 冉茂勇,赵允格,刘玉兰.黄土丘陵区不同盖度生物结皮土壤抗冲性研究[J].中国水土保持,2011(12):43-45.
    [17] 李兆松,王兵,李盼盼,等.氮添加条件下白羊草种群及近地表生物结皮对土壤入渗性能的影响[J].山地学报,2018,36(3):354-363.
    [18] Li Gang, Abrahams A D, Atkinson J F. Correction factors in the determination of mean velocity of overland flow [J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1996,21(6):509-515.
    [19] 张光辉.坡面薄层流水动力学特性的试验研究[J].水科学进展,2002,13(2):159-165.
    [20] 张国彪.小型冲蚀槽设计中水力学参数获取及冲蚀试验效果[D].湖北 武汉:华中农业大学,2012.
    [21] 王龙生,蔡强国,蔡崇法,等.黄土坡面细沟与细沟间水流水动力学特性研究[J].泥沙研究,2013(6):45-52.
    [22] 白玉洁,张风宝,杨明义,等.急陡黄土坡面薄层水流水力学参数变化特征[J].土壤学报,2018,55(3):641-649.
    [23] 王国鹏,肖波,李胜龙,等.黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区生物结皮的地表粗糙度特征及其影响因素[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(10):3050-3056.
    [24] Wang Lunjiang, Zhang Guanghui, Zhu Liangjun, et al. Biocrust wetting induced change in soil surface roughness as influenced by biocrust type, coverage and wetting patterns [J]. Geoderma, 2017,306(15):1-9.
    [25] 孙福海,肖波,李胜龙,等.黄土高原不同发育阶段生物结皮的导水和持水特征[J].草业学报,2021,30(6):54-63.
    [26] 张丙昌,武志芳,李彬.黄土高原生物土壤结皮研究进展与展望[J].土壤学报,2021,58(5):1123-1131.
    [27] 赵录友.基于侵蚀能量的坡面径流挟沙力研究[D].陕西 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2020.
    [28] 叶菁.翻耙、踩踏对苔藓结皮的生长及土壤水分、水蚀的影响[D].陕西 杨凌:中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心,2015.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

张慧妮,王兵,张宝琦,韩剑桥,许欢欢.黄土丘陵区生物结皮对坡面流水动力特征的影响[J].水土保持通报英文版,2022,42(2):16-21

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:188
  • PDF: 789
  • HTML: 989
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:August 14,2021
  • Revised:October 26,2021
  • Online: May 26,2022