Coupling Relationships Between Rural Land Consolidation Projects and Rural Beautification Construction at Jingbian County of Shaanxi Province
Author:
Clc Number:

S281

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [21]
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The coupling relationships and change mechanisms between rural land consolidation projects and rural beautification construction were studied in order to provide a theoretical basis for implementing plans for land consolidation projects in the context of rural beautification construction. [Methods] Eleven rural land consolidation projects at Jingbian County of Shaanxi Province were selected as cases. An evaluation index system for rural land consolidation projects and an evaluation system for rural beautification construction were established. The entropy weight method was used to determine the index weight. The relative coefficient evaluation method was used to process the basic data and to calculate index scores. A correlation analysis curve was determined using Sigmaplot 10.0 software to estimate a regression model in order to explore the coupling relationship between rural land consolidation projects and rural beautification construction. [Results] ① Coupling relationships between economic benefit and village appearance, living standard, rural civilization, and production development followed the order of living standard > production development > rural civilization > village appearance. The coupling relationship between economic benefits and village appearance was not significant; ② Coupling relationships between grain production capacity and village appearance, living standard, rural civilization, and production development followed the order of production development > living standard > rural civilization > village appearance. As grain production capacity increased, village appearance score initially increased, then decreased, and finally increased, but the fluctuation range was narrow (between 50 and 70). The change trend between grain production capacity and both living standard and rural civilization increased with increasing grain production capacity score, and living standard initially decreased and then increased. ③ The coupling relationships between cultivated land grade and village appearance, living standard, rural civilization, and production development followed the order of production development > living standard > rural civilization > village appearance. The relationships between cultivated land grade and village appearance, rural civilization, and production development initially decreased, then increased, and finally decreased. The fluctuation ranges were 50—70, 20—80, and 30—80 points, respectively. The coupling relationship between cultivated land grade and village appearance was the lowest. [Conclusion] Through the analysis of the coupling function curve and the correlation coefficient, it can be concluded that for rural land consolidation, economic benefits, grain production capacity, and cultivated land have good coupling relationships with living standard and production development for the evaluation index of rural beautification construction, followed by the relationship with rural civilization. The coupling relationship with village appearance needs to be further improved to provide new solutions for subsequent land consolidation project innovations and system innovations that will ultimately achieve mutual benefits between the two systems.

    Reference
    [1] 江东,林刚,付晶莹.“三生空间”统筹的科学基础与优化途径探析[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(5):1085-1101.
    [2] 盖美,王秀琪.美丽中国建设时空演变及耦合研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(8):2931-2943.
    [3] 邓倩.人与自然和谐共生:疫情防控实践的价值支撑[J].中学政治教学参考,2021(7):47-50.
    [4] 燕连福,赵建斌,毛丽霞.习近平生态文明思想的核心内涵、建设指向和实现路径[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(1):1-9.
    [5] 张浩泽.“土地整治+”与美丽乡村建设的契合性:以上海市“土地整治+”实践经验为依据[J].区域治理,2019(41):164-167.
    [6] 李全宝.园地和残次林地开发关键问题研究:以江苏省新沂市为例[J].中国国土资源经济,2019,32(6):53-58.
    [7] Altes W K K, Sang B I M. Promoting rural development through the use of land consolidation: The case of Korea [J]. International Planning Studies, 2011,16(2):151-167.
    [8] 吴得峰.美丽乡村建设背景下残次林地土地开发项目经济效益分析:以靖边县掌高兔村项目为例[J].农业与技术,2021,41(1):156-159.
    [9] 孙心如,周学武,王占岐.农村土地整治与生态文明建设耦合关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):267-271.
    [10] 张晓燕.土地整治如何融入美丽乡村建设[J].中国土地,2015(7):21-23.
    [11] 张如林,余建忠,蔡健,等.都市近郊区乡村振兴规划探索:全域土地综合整治背景下桐庐乡村振兴规划实践[J].城市规划,2020,44(S1):57-66.
    [12] 李雪芬.美丽乡村建设背景下侗戏的传承与发展路径探究[J].四川戏剧,2021(4):128-130.
    [13] 庞琳,张亦佳.基于美丽乡村背景的历史文化村镇“原乡”发展模式探讨:以河北省地区为例[J].农业经济,2021(3):54-55.
    [14] 廖远立,钟传勇,宋育忠,等.五华县宜林荒山及残次林地植被与土壤调查[J].绿色科技,2016(11):115-116.
    [15] Tang Xiumei, Pan Yuchun, Liu Yu. Analysis and demonstration of investment implementation model and paths for China’s cultivated land consolidation [J]. Applied Geography, 2017, 82:24-34.
    [16] 张会丽.贫瘠土地变良田[J].资源导刊,2019(7):38.
    [17] 信桂新,杨朝现,杨庆媛,等.用熵权法和改进TOPSIS模型评价高标准基本农田建设后效应[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(1):238-249.
    [18] 刘继志.天津市美丽乡村建设模式及效益评价体系构建[J].中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(10):256-261.
    [19] 李炎,张金池,陈佩弦,等.农村土地整治与美丽乡村建设的耦合关系:以南京市11个项目区为例[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(2):317-324.
    [20] John A L, Craig A G. The environmental Kuznets curve:does one size fit all? [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999,31(3):409-423.
    [21] Ruether R R. Ecofeminism: Symbolic and social connections of the oppression of women, and the domination of nature [J]. Feminist Theology, 1993.3(9):35-50.
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

吴得峰.陕西省靖边县农村土地整治项目与美丽乡村建设耦合关系研究[J].水土保持通报英文版,2022,42(2):228-234

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:September 19,2021
  • Revised:November 14,2021
  • Online: May 26,2022