Chemical Characteristics and Quality Evaluation of Groundwater in Beichuan River Basin in Qinghai Province
Author:
Clc Number:

P641

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [22]
  • |
  • Related
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The chemical characteristics of groundwater in Beichuan River basin were analysed, and groundwater quality was evaluated objectively from the perspective of resource attributes of groundwater in order to provide data support for regional groundwater environmental protection. [Methods] 189 sets of groundwater chemical data acquired by hydrogeological surveys in 2019 were selected to analyze the distribution characteristics and sources of groundwater chemical composition in Beichuan River basin. An evaluation method for regional groundwater quality was constructed by assigning different coefficients for water quality type to a single sampling point. [Results] The groundwater chemical distribution of Beichuan River basin exhibited a large spatial variability. HCO3-type freshwater was widely disturbed in the upstream sections of the hilly mountainous area and the valley plain area , and SO42-, Cl-type brackish and salt water, as well as HCO3·Cl-Na type freshwater gradually appeared downstream, indicating human activities. Weathered dissolution of carbonate rock and silicate rock controlled the source of groundwater chemical components, but local areas were enriched due to evaporation concentration. Natural background elements such as Al, Fe, and Th were the main influencing indicators that had exceeded the underground water quality standard in the study area, but typical contamination components such as Pb, NO3-, and carbon tetrachloride were more obvious in the industrial zone and the population-concentrated area. Under the driving influences of human pollution and naturally high background conditions, the underground water quality in the river valley plain was more complicated. The over-standard ratios of the hilly mountainous region and the valley plain region based on the quantity of sampling points were 57.0% and 27.1% respectively, but these values were reduced to 29.4% and 12.6% according to the new evaluation method proposed in this study. [Conclusion] The impact of human pollution on the chemical components of groundwater was mainly concentrated in middle and lower reaches of the valley plain zone, and chemical components of groundwater in most other regions were controlled by natural background conditions. Through the newly proposed regional groundwater quality evaluation method, groundwater quality evaluation results and groundwater resources were combined, and the proportion of abundant high quality groundwater area was highlighted in the whole area. Finally, the problem of excessive over-standard rate in the regional groundwater quality evaluation results was effectively resolved.

    Reference
    [1] 文冬光,林良俊,孙继朝,等.中国东部主要平原地下水质量与污染评价[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2012,37(2):220-228.
    [2] 吴爱民,荆继红,宋博.略论中国水安全问题与地下水的保障作用[J].地质学报,2016,90(10):2939-2947.
    [3] Wu Aimin, Hao Aibin, Guo Haipeng, et al. Main progress and prospect for China’s hydrogeological survey [J]. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2020,8(3):195-209.
    [4] 中华人民共和国生态环境部.2019中国生态环境状况公报[R].北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部,2020.
    [5] 张兆吉,费宇红,郭春艳,等.华北平原区域地下水污染评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012(5):1456-1461.
    [6] 杨永宇,尹亮,刘畅,等.基于灰关联和BP神经网络法评价黑河流域水质[J].人民黄河,2017,39(6):58-62.
    [7] Dahiya S, Singh B, Gaur S, et al. Analysis of groundwater quality using fuzzy synthetic evaluation [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007,147(3):938-946.
    [8] Liu Fan, Huang Guanxing, Sun Jichao, et al. A new evaluation method for groundwater quality applied in Guangzhou region, China: Using fuzzy method combining toxicity index [J]. Water Environment Research, 2016,88(2):99-106.
    [9] Zhang Bing, Song Xianfang, Zhang Yinghua, et al. Hydrochemical characteristics and water quality assessment of surface water and groundwater in Songnen Plain, Northeast China [J]. Water Research, 2012,46(8):2737-2748.
    [10] 中华人民共和国国土资源部. DZ/T0288-2015区域地下水污染调查评价规范[S].北京:地质出版社,2015.
    [11] 李巧,周金龙,高业新,等.新疆北部平原区2003―2011年地下水水质变化特征[J].地学前缘,2014,21(4):124-134.
    [12] 许真,何江涛,马文洁,等.地下水质量指标分类综合评价方法研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2014,41(6):6-12.
    [13] 朱亮,刘景涛,周冰,等.1998年以来兰州市地下水环境变化及驱动因素[J].中国地质,2020,47(6):1677-1687.
    [14] 吕晓立,刘景涛,周冰,等.塔城盆地地下水氟分布特征及富集机理[J].地学前缘,2021,28(2):426-436.
    [15] 高存荣,刘文波,冯翠娥,等.干旱、半干旱地区高砷地下水形成机理研究:以中国内蒙古河套平原为例[J].地学前缘,2014,21(4):13-29.
    [16] Gibbs R J. Mechanisms controlling world water chemistry [J]. Science, 1970,170:1088-1090.
    [17] Fan Bailing, Zhao Zhiqi, Tao Faxiang, et al. Characteristics of carbonate, evaporite and silicate weathering in Huanghe River basin: A comparison among the upstream, midstream and downstream [J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2014,96(15):17-26.
    [18] 吕晓立,刘景涛,朱亮,等.甘肃省榆中盆地地下水化学演化特征及控制因素[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(2):194-201.
    [19] 张福初,吴彬,高凡,等.奎屯河流域平原区地下水水化学特征及成因分析[J].环境科学研究,2021,34(7):1663-1671.
    [20] 孙厚云,卫晓锋,甘凤伟,等.滦河流域中上游富锶地下水成因类型与形成机制[J].地球学报,2020,41(1):65-79.
    [21] 朱亮,杨明楠,张玉玺,等.东胜城区及周边地区浅层地下水硝酸盐分布及影响因素研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2016,27(5):37-41.
    [22] 朱亮,康卫东,王润兰,等.人类活动对榆林地区地下水水质的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014(11):54-59.
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

朱亮,刘景涛,杨明楠,刘春燕,周冰,解飞,李备.青海省北川河流域地下水水化学特征与水质评价[J].水土保持通报英文版,2022,42(2):235-241,249

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:223
  • PDF: 846
  • HTML: 1
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:November 09,2021
  • Revised:December 10,2021
  • Online: May 26,2022