Spatial Conflicts of Productive-Living-Ecological Land in Urumqi City of Xinjiang Wei Autonomous Region
Author:
Clc Number:

P208, P237, F301.24

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [32]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] Changes in productive-living-ecological land and its spatial conflicts in Urumqi City, Xinjiang Wei Autonomous Region, were studied in order to provide references for the optimal allocation of land resources in this region. [Methods] A spatial conflict measurement model at the grid scale was constructed for Urumqi City from the three factors of external pressure, vulnerability, and stability. The spatiotemporal characteristics of spatial conflicts in this region from 2000 to 2018 were then quantitatively evaluated. [Results] ① From 2000 to 2018, the northern part of Urumqi City was the main growth direction for urban living land, and the spatial pattern of agricultural production land showed a fragmentation trend. Ecological land was the main component of productive-living-ecological land in Urumqi City. Therefore, the occupation of new core ecological land by human activities should be avoided. ② The conflict levels of productive-living-ecological space in each period followed the order of stable and controllable > minor conflict > moderate conflict > heavy conflict. ③ The spatial unit of severe conflict had the largest increase, indicating that the scope of uncontrolled severe conflict in the study area was expanding, and should be the key area of spatial conflict regulation in Urumqi City. ④ There were some differences in spatial conflicts among different spatial types, and conflict intensity followed the order of productive space > living space > ecological space. [Conclusion] Changes in productive-living-ecological land in Urumqi City was strongly influenced by regional economic and social development. In the future, the phenomenon of conflict level gradually increasing due to the rapid expansion of living space should be gradually changed. The dynamic monitoring of urban living land should be given more attention, and the core ecological land should be protected in order to achieve more coordinated land use.

    Reference
    [1] 高星,刘泽伟,李晨曦,等.基于“三生空间”的雄安新区土地利用功能转型与生态环境效应研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(20):7113-7122.
    [2] 康庆,郭青霞,丁一,等.山西省“三生”功能协同/权衡关系分析[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(5):1195-1207.
    [3] 金星星,陆玉麒,林金煌,等.闽三角城市群生产—生活—生态时空格局演化与功能测度[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4286-4295.
    [4] 王考,姚云峰,包金兰.县级尺度“三生”用地动态变化及其空间集聚特征[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(1):306-312,329.
    [5] Siebert S, Häser J M, Nagieb L, et al. Agricultural, architectural and archaeological evidence for the role and ecological adaptation of a scattered mountain oasis in Oman [J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2004,62(1):177-197.
    [6] 廖李红,戴文远,陈娟,等.平潭岛快速城市化进程中三生空间冲突分析[J].资源科学,2017,39(10):1823-1833.
    [7] Zhao Liyuan, Peng Zhongren. LandSys: An agent-based Cellular Automata model of land use change developed for transportation analysis [J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2012,25(7)35-49.
    [8] 于伯华,吕昌河.土地利用冲突分析:概念与方法[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(3):106-115.
    [9] 马学广,王爱民,闫小培.城市空间重构进程中的土地利用冲突研究:以广州市为例[J].人文地理,2010,25(3):72-77.
    [10] 蔡天雨,徐磊,陈亚恒,等.基于生态安全的青龙满族自治县土地利用冲突识别[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):273-280,2.
    [11] 谭术魁,齐睿,张红霞.征地冲突后果评价与预警[J].中国土地科学,2012,26(2):19-24.
    [12] 周德,徐建春,王莉.近15年来中国土地利用冲突研究进展与展望[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(2):21-29.
    [13] 胡雁娟.长株潭城市群土地利用冲突时空演变及机理研究[D].湖南 长沙:湖南农业大学,2013.
    [14] 马倩,张洋,赵枫.基于PSR模型的干旱区绿洲城市生态安全评价:以乌鲁木齐市为例[J].土壤通报,2011,42(5):1225-1230.
    [15] 戴文远,江方奇,黄万里,等.基于“三生空间”的土地利用功能转型及生态服务价值研究:以福州新区为例[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(12):2098-2109.
    [16] 刘继来,刘彦随,李裕瑞.中国“三生空间”分类评价与时空格局分析[J].地理学报,2017,72(7):1290-1304.
    [17] 杨亮洁,王晶,魏伟,等.干旱内陆河流域生态安全格局的构建及优化:以石羊河流域为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(17):5915-5927.
    [18] 谢花林,李秀彬.基于GIS的农村住区生态重要性空间评价及其分区管制:以兴国县长冈乡为例[J].生态学报,2011,31(1):230-238.
    [19] 张珊珊.基于生态安全的龙海市土地利用冲突研究[D].福建 福州:福建农林大学,2019.
    [20] 张学渊,魏伟,颉斌斌,等.西北干旱区生态承载力监测及安全格局构建[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(11):2389-2402.
    [21] 姚远,丁建丽,赵振亮.快速城市化背景下的乌鲁木齐市土地利用变化人文驱动力定量研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(10):132-137.
    [22] 乔蕻强.石羊河流域景观格局变化及生态安全构建研究[D].甘肃 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2019.
    [23] 夏富强,唐宏,杨德刚,等.绿洲城市水资源压力及其对城市发展的影响:以乌鲁木齐为例[J].干旱区地理,2014,37(2):380-387.
    [24] 黄钰涵.基于遥感的绿洲城市生态环境变化评价[D].甘肃 兰州:兰州交通大学,2020.
    [25] 王志涛,门明新,崔江慧.沽源县未利用地生态重要性空间识别及其地形梯度特征分析[J].中国生态农业学报,2016,24(2):256-264.
    [26] 孙丕苓.生态安全视角下的环京津贫困带土地利用冲突时空演变研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2017.
    [27] 廖李红.城市更新下的福州旧城区三生空间冲突研究[D].福建 福州:福建师范大学,2018.
    [28] 蒙吉军,江颂,拉巴卓玛,等.基于景观格局的黑河中游土地利用冲突时空分析[J].地理科学,2020,40(9):1553-1562.
    [29] 彭佳捷,周国华,唐承丽,等.基于生态安全的快速城市化地区空间冲突测度:以长株潭城市群为例[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(9):1507-1519.
    [30] 赵旭,汤峰,张蓬涛,等.基于CLUE-S模型的县域生产—生活—生态空间冲突动态模拟及特征分析[J].生态学报,2019,39(16):5897-5908.
    [31] 许子艺.浙北丘陵山区农业空间和生态空间土地利用冲突识别和权衡研究[D].浙江 杭州:浙江大学,2020.
    [32] 秦坤.基于生态安全的土地利用空间冲突研究:以武汉城市圈[D].湖北 武汉:武汉大学,2017.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

王珊珊,毋兆鹏,王娟娟,尹慧慧,李斌才.新疆乌鲁木齐市“三生”用地的空间冲突研究[J].水土保持通报英文版,2022,42(2):330-337

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:678
  • PDF: 848
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:May 11,2021
  • Revised:July 11,2021
  • Online: May 26,2022