Evolution and Hotspot Analysis of Ecological Compensation Research in Watersheds
Author:
Clc Number:

X196,F062.2

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [42]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The research status of watershed ecological compensation was analyzed and mastered in order to provide a basis for improving the compensation system and promoting watershed ecological protection and high-quality development of river basins in China.[Methods] CiteSpace visualization software, Price's law, and the X index were used to analyze 876 studies collected by CNKI for author co-occurrence, high-frequency keywords, and research topic clustering.[Results] Domestic research on watershed ecological compensation mainly began in 2000, and the annual number of publications showed an upward trend. Research hotspots were highly coupled with national policies and watershed development, mainly including quantitative research on watershed ecological compensation standards, research on the behavior of watershed ecological compensation subjects from the perspective of game theory, and research on watershed ecological compensation mechanisms under the background of ecological protection. According to the evolution characteristics of research topics, three stages could be identified:preliminary exploration (before 2007), rapid development (2007-2017), and consolidation and improvement (from 2018 to 2021). During these time periods, research emphasis changed from theoretical analysis to quantitative analysis of compensation standards under the background of water resource governance. The objective of this research focused on the two major water systems of the Yangtze River basin and the Yellow River basin. Researches on the main stream and important tributaries were carried out alternately and gradually deepened. The researches formed multiple basic scientific research platforms, but there were few high-yield authors and little cross sectoral cooperation.[Conclusion] Over the past 20 years, research in the field of watershed ecological compensation in China has formed a certain theoretical system and research framework. The research topics and hot spots have distinctive characteristics, and the research methods have tended to be systematic and diversified. In the future, theory and application should be combined to explore the dynamic and market-oriented compensation mechanisms suitable for regional characteristics.

    Reference
    [1] 中国生态补偿机制与政策研究课题组.中国生态补偿机制与政策研究[M].北京:科学出版社, 2007.
    [2] 张惠远, 刘桂环.流域生态补偿与污染赔偿机制[J].世界环境, 2009(2):34-35.
    [3] 谢婧, 文一惠, 朱媛媛, 等.我国流域生态补偿政策演进及发展建议[J].环境保护, 2021, 49(7):31-37.
    [4] 巨文慧, 孙宏亮, 赵越, 等.我国流域生态补偿发展实践与政策建议[J].环境与发展, 2019, 31(11):1-2.
    [5] 万勇, 杨思雅.完善流域生态补偿机制研究:以安徽省为例[J].地方财政研究, 2021(6):60-67.
    [6] 张捷, 傅京燕.我国流域省际横向生态补偿机制初探:以九洲江和汀江-韩江流域为例[J].中国环境管理, 2016, 8(6):19-24.
    [7] 郑文, 胡元林.我国流域生态补偿的实践、问题及对策[J].经济研究导刊, 2018(14):55-57.
    [8] 沈满洪, 谢慧明.跨界流域生态补偿的"新安江模式"及可持续制度安排[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(9):156-163.
    [9] 刘云浪, 程胜高, 才惠莲, 等.跨流域调水生态补偿研究述评[J].长江科学院院报, 2015, 32(9):6-13.
    [10] 乔旭宁, 杨永菊, 杨德刚.流域生态补偿研究现状及关键问题剖析[J].地理科学进展, 2012, 31(4):395-402.
    [11] 郗永勤, 王景群.市场化、多元化视角下我国流域生态补偿机制研究[J].电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2020, 22(1):54-60.
    [12] 李怀恩, 尚小英, 王媛.流域生态补偿标准计算方法研究进展[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 39(4):667-672.
    [13] 宋红丽, 薛惠锋, 董会忠.流域生态补偿支付方式研究[J].环境科学与技术, 2008(2):144-147.
    [14] 王奕淇, 李国平, 延步青.流域生态服务价值横向补偿分摊研究[J].资源科学, 2019, 41(6):1013-1023.
    [15] Bederson B B, Shneiderman B.The Craft of Information Visualization:Readings and Reflections[M].San Francisco:Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.
    [16] Chen Chaomei, Hu Zhigang, Liu Shengbo, et al.Emerging trends in regenerative medicine:A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace[J].Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 2012, 12(5):593-608.
    [17] 宗淑萍.基于普赖斯定律和综合指数法的核心著者测评:以《中国科技期刊研究》为例[J].中国科技期刊研究, 2016, 27(12):1310-1314.
    [18] 张学梅, 方向明.一种基于对数函数的个人学术水平评价指标理论及实证研究[J].情报杂志, 2016, 35(1):64-67.
    [19] 张新平, 张芳芳, 徐勇, 等.基于CiteSpace的国内外生态足迹研究知识图谱比较[J].资源开发与市场, 2017, 33(11):1347-1353.
    [20] 袁正蓉, 巨莉, 李富程.基于CiteSpace方法的近30年耕作侵蚀学科动态可视化分析[J].水土保持研究, 2021, 28(5):407-411.
    [21] 刘菊, 傅斌, 张成虎, 等.基于InVEST模型的岷江上游生态系统水源涵养量与价值评估[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(3):577-585.
    [22] 曾贤刚, 刘纪新, 段存儒, 等.基于生态系统服务的市场化生态补偿机制研究:以五马河流域为例[J].中国环境科学, 2018, 38(12):4755-4763.
    [23] 刘桂环, 文一惠, 张惠远.基于生态系统服务的官厅水库流域生态补偿机制研究[J].资源科学, 2010, 32(5):856-863.
    [24] 伏润民, 缪小林.中国生态功能区财政转移支付制度体系重构:基于拓展的能值模型衡量的生态外溢价值[J].经济研究, 2015, 50(3):47-61.
    [25] 耿翔燕, 葛颜祥.基于水量分配的流域生态补偿研究:以小清河流域为例[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(4):36-44.
    [26] 周春芳, 张新, 刘斌.基于演化博弈的流域生态补偿机制研究:以贵州赤水河流域为例[J].人民长江, 2018, 49(23):38-42.
    [27] 李宁, 王磊, 张建清.基于博弈理论的流域生态补偿利益相关方决策行为研究[J].统计与决策, 2017(23):54-59.
    [28] 王奕淇, 李国平.基于选择实验法的流域中下游居民生态补偿支付意愿及其偏好研究:以渭河流域为例[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(9):2877-2885.
    [29] 徐大伟, 刘春燕, 常亮.流域生态补偿意愿的WTP与WTA差异性研究:基于辽河中游地区居民的CVM调查[J].自然资源学报, 2013, 28(3):402-409.
    [30] 周晨, 李国平.流域生态补偿的支付意愿及影响因素:以南水北调中线工程受水区郑州市为例[J].经济地理, 2015, 35(6):38-46.
    [31] 彭晓春, 刘强, 周丽旋, 等.基于利益相关方意愿调查的东江流域生态补偿机制探讨[J].生态环境学报, 2010, 19(7):1605-1610.
    [32] 张化楠, 葛颜祥, 接玉梅, 等.生态认知对流域居民生态补偿参与意愿的影响研究:基于大汶河的调查数据[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(9):109-116.
    [33] 赵玉, 张玉, 熊国保.基于随机效用理论的赣江流域生态补偿支付意愿研究[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(7):1049-1056.
    [34] 肖俊威, 杨亦民.湖南省湘江流域生态补偿的居民支付意愿WTP实证研究:基于CVM条件价值法[J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(8):139-144.
    [35] 王怀毅, 李忠魁, 俞燕琴.基于PPP模式实施林业项目的思考[J].林业资源管理, 2021(5):20-26.
    [36] 王军锋, 侯超波.中国流域生态补偿机制实施框架与补偿模式研究:基于补偿资金来源的视角[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23(2):23-29.
    [37] 何可, 闫阿倩, 王璇, 等.1996-2018年中国农业生态补偿研究进展:基于中国知网1582篇文献的分析[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(4):65-71.
    [38] 王慧杰, 毕粉粉, 董战峰.基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的新安江流域生态补偿政策绩效评估[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(20):7493-7506.
    [39] 孟钰, 张宽, 高富豪, 等.基于组合赋权模型的小洪河流域生态补偿效果评价[J].节水灌溉, 2019(10):64-67.
    [40] 于鲁冀, 葛丽燕, 梁亦欣.河南省水环境生态补偿机制及实施效果评价[J].环境污染与防治, 2011, 33(4):87-90.
    [41] 张来章, 党维勤, 郑好, 等.黄河流域水土保持生态补偿机制及实施效果评价[J].水土保持通报, 2010, 30(3):176-181.
    [42] 邓伟, 夏正洪.基于科学知识图谱的应急救援研究可视化分析[J].科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(19):7573-7578.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

王怀毅,李忠魁.流域生态补偿研究的演进与热点分析[J].水土保持通报英文版,2022,42(3):304-311

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:199
  • PDF: 713
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:November 04,2021
  • Revised:December 23,2021
  • Online: August 02,2022