Characteristics of Erosive Rainfall and Its Effects on Runoff and Sediment Yield in a Low Mountain and Hilly Area of Lianyungang City
Author:
Clc Number:

S157.1

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [34]
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The effects of different rainfall characteristics and different underlying surface conditions on soil erosion and sediment yield were determined in a low mountain and hilly area of Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province, in order to provide a reference for local soil and water loss prevention and improvement of soil and water conservation benefits.[Methods] Local erosive rainfall types from the Heilin soil and water conservation monitoring point from 2013 to 2020 were classified by the K-means clustering method. The characteristics of erosive rainfall were identified and the correlations among rainfall, runoff, and sediment yield of five slope runoff plots at the monitoring point were analyzed by the grey correlation method. Differences in runoff and sediment yield capacity due to different underlying surface conditions were compared by the double accumulation curve method, and the soil and water conservation effects of human activities on surface disturbance were analyzed.[Results] ① Erosive rainfall mainly occurred during the flood season, mainly from type Ⅰ (small rainfall and light rainfall intensity) rainfall events, accounting for 66% of the rainfall frequency, followed by type Ⅱ (medium rainfall and medium rainfall intensity) rainfall events and type Ⅳ (large rainfall and medium rainfall intensity) rainfall events. Type Ⅲ (large rainfall and heavy rainfall intensity) rainfall events were the least frequent type of rainfall events; ② Sediment yield was closely related to rainfall and runoff depth, and the correlation coefficient ranges were 0.64~0.85 and 0.61~0.86. respectively; ③ The runoff and sediment yield of secondary rainfall caused by type Ⅲ rainfall were the largest, and the total amount of soil loss caused by type Ⅳ rainfall was the largest; ④ The sediment yield capacity of agricultural land was the largest, followed by forest land. The sediment yield capacity of natural wasteland was the smallest. Reducing the artificial disturbance of surface soil, horizontal ridging and planting, and selecting plants with high coverage were more conducive to improving local soil and water conservation benefits. On the whole, the soil and water conservation benefits of forest land were greater than those of agricultural land. ⑤ The differences in runoff and sediment yield due to different underlying surfaces decreased gradually with increasing rainfall and rainfall intensity.[Conclusion] Erosive rainfall mainly occurred during the flood season in a low mountain and hilly area of Lianyungang City. There were obvious differences in the characteristics of runoff and sediment yield due to different rainfall types and underlying surfaces, and the benefits of forest land to soil and water conservation were greater than those of agricultural land.

    Reference
    [1] 孙习稳,李晓妹.水土流失是我国最严重的公害[J].国土与自然资源研究,2002(4):36-38.
    [2] 才业锦.重庆市水土保持措施效应及小流域治理范式评价[D].重庆:西南大学,2010.
    [3] 徐宪立,马克明,傅伯杰,等.植被与水土流失关系研究进展[J].生态学报,2006,26(9):3137-3143.
    [4] 李鹏,李占斌,郑良勇,等.坡面径流侵蚀产沙动力机制比较研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):66-69.
    [5] 寇馨月,黄俊,姜学兵,等.不同下垫面径流小区次降雨对产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(2):27-31,38.
    [6] 孙从建,侯慧新,陈伟,等.典型黄土塬区不同植物措施水土保持效应分析[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(7):1405-1416.
    [7] 李锡泉,田育新,袁正科,等.湘西山地不同植被类型的水土保持效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(2):123-125,157.
    [8] 张守红,刘苏峡,莫兴国,等.降雨和水保措施对无定河流域径流和产沙量影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2010,32(4):161-168.
    [9] Derek B B, James R K, Sally S, et al. Reviving urban streams:Land use, hydrology, biology and human behavior[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2004,40(5):1351-1364.
    [10] Piao Shilong, Ciais P, Huang Yao, et al. The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China[J]. Nature, 2010,467(7311):43-51.
    [11] 张晓明,余新晓,武思宏,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型流域土地利用/土地覆被变化对径流产沙的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2007,29(6):115-122.
    [12] 朱燕琴,赵志斌,齐广平,等.黄土丘陵区坡面产流产沙的影响因素分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(8):173-178.
    [13] 杨云斌,张建军,李梁,等.晋西黄土区降雨过程对小流域产流的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(3):105-114.
    [14] 王万忠.黄土地区降雨特性与土壤流失关系的研究(Ⅲ):关于侵蚀性降雨的标准问题[J].水土保持通报,1984(2):58-63.
    [15] 谢波,杨广斌,李亦秋,等.黔中喀斯特山地侵蚀性降雨特征及其侵蚀响应[J].生态科学,2021,40(3):222-230.
    [16] 杨青,杨广斌,赵青松,等.喀斯特地区不同降雨和植被覆盖的坡面产流产沙特征[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(1):9-16.
    [17] 张琳卿,覃莉,刘忠仙,等.黔中喀斯特地区坡面种植措施对土壤水分及产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(3):15-21,30.
    [18] 辛伟,朱波,唐家良,等.紫色土丘陵区典型坡地产流及产沙模拟试验研究[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(2):31-35.
    [19] 马星,郑江坤,王文武,等.不同雨型下紫色土区坡耕地产流产沙特征[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):17-21.
    [20] 王小博,朱永清,吴宜进,等.不同植被下降雨类型对红壤坡地土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):6-11.
    [21] 汪邦稳,肖胜生,张光辉,等.南方红壤区不同利用土地产流产沙特征试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(2):239-243.
    [22] 高磊,饶良懿,崔飞波,等.太行山土石山区侵蚀性降雨对典型植物措施产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):5-11.
    [23] 林锦阔,李子君,许海超,等.降雨因子对沂蒙山区不同土地利用方式径流小区产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(5):7-12,19.
    [24] 林和平,刘丁慧,鲍乃源.灰色相关分析及其应用研究[J].吉林大学学报(信息科学版),2007,25(1):84-90.
    [25] 赵阳,余新晓.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型流域气候和土地利用变化对径流泥沙产量的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2013,35(3):39-45.
    [26] 冉大川,刘斌,付良勇,等.双累积曲线计算水土保持减水减沙效益方法探讨[J].人民黄河,1996,18(6):24-25.
    [27] 穆兴民,张秀勤,高鹏,等.双累积曲线方法理论及在水文气象领域应用中应注意的问题[J].水文,2010,30(4):47-51.
    [28] 陶莹,杨锋,刘洋,等.K均值聚类算法的研究与优化[J].计算机技术与发展,2018,28(6):90-92.
    [29] Abdeyazdan M. Data clustering based on hybrid K-harmonic means and modifier imperialist competitive algorithm[J]. Journal of Supercomputing, 2014,68(2):574-598.
    [30] Hung C H, Chiou H M, Yang Weining, et al. Candidate groups search for K-harmonic means data clustering[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013,37(24):10123-10128.
    [31] 罗军锋,锁志海.一种基于密度的K-means聚类算法[J].微电子学与计算机,2014,31(10):28-31.
    [32] Wischmeier W H. Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses from cropland and east of the Rocky Mountains[M]. USDA, ARS:Agriculture Hand Book, 1965.
    [33] 杨轩,李丹丹,吕玮玮,等.降雨侵蚀力模型研究进展[J].现代农业科技,2019(14):199-202,206.
    [34] 李广,黄高宝.雨强和土地利用方式对黄土丘陵区水土流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(11):85-90.
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

陶淑芸,刘沂轩,程建敏,王桂林.连云港市低山丘陵区侵蚀性降雨特征及产流产沙规律[J].水土保持通报英文版,2022,42(4):33-41

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:October 25,2021
  • Revised:February 05,2022
  • Online: September 23,2022