Comparative Study on Soil Infiltration Characteristics of Different Land Use Types in Horqin Sandy Land
Author:
Clc Number:

S152.7

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [24]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • |
  • Cited by [1]
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The differences in water infiltration characteristics between different land use types in Horqin sandy land were determined in order to provide a scientific reference for the study of water and material transport in the vadose zone in arid and semi-arid regions.[Methods] Soil infiltration and its influencing factors for eight typical land use types (Pinus sylvestris plantation, Caragana korshinsk plantation, Caragana microphylla plantation, abandoned grassland, meadow grassland, sparse forest grassland, corn field, and bare sandy land) in Horqin sandy land were measured in the field using a double ring infiltration apparatus and a laboratory analysis of soil physical properties. At the same time, the Kastiakov model, the Horton model, the Philip model, and the G-P comprehensive model were used to simulate the water infiltration process, and goodness of fit values for the models were compared.[Results] ① There were significant differences in soil infiltration characteristics among different land use types. The initial infiltration rates ranged from 1.595 mm/min to 12.020 mm/min, and followed the order of bare sandy land>Caragana korshinskii plantation>corn field > Pinus sylvestris plantation>Caragana microphylla plantation>meadow grassland>abandoned grassland>sparse forest grassland. The infiltration rate at 15 min varied from 0.617 mm/min to 3.690 mm/min, and followed the order of bare sandy land>Caragana korshinskii plantation>Pinus sylvestris plantation>Caragana microphylla plantation>corn field>abandoned grassland>meadow grassland>sparse forest grassland. The saturated infiltration rate varied from 0.576 mm/min to 3.495 mm/min, and followed the order of bare sandy land>Caragana korshinskii plantation>corn field>Caragana microphylla plantation>Pinus sylvestris plantation>abandoned grassland>meadow grassland>sparse forest grassland. ② The infiltration rate of different land use types was negatively correlated with soil bulk density and fine sand content, and positively correlated with medium sand content. Stable infiltration rate was positively correlated with non-capillary porosity. ③ The goodness of fit values for the models to estimate soil infiltration in Horqin sandy land followed the order of Horton model>G-P comprehensive model>Kastiakov model>Philip model. The Horton model had the highest coefficient of determination and the smallest relative error, and could accurately reflect the actual situation of soil infiltration in Horqin sandy land.[Conclusion] The characteristics of soil infiltration were different among different land use types in Horqin sandy land. The Horton model had high fitting ability in Horqin sandy land, and can, therefore, be used to estimate water infiltration.

    Reference
    [1] 纳磊,张建军,朱金兆,等.晋西黄土区不同土地利用类型坡面土壤饱和导水率研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(3):69-73.
    [2] 雷泽勇,刘心玲,周凯,等.辽西北沙地人工林植物水分亏缺与恢复研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(4):86-90.
    [3] 夏江宝,杨吉华,李红云.不同外界条件下土壤入渗性能的研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(2):115-117.
    [4] 方胜,彭韬,王世杰,等.喀斯特坡地土壤稳渗率空间分布变化特征研究[J].地球与环境,2014,42(1):1-10.
    [5] 毛天旭,朱元骏,邵明安,等.模拟降雨条件下含砾石土壤的坡面产流和入渗特征[J].土壤通报,2011,42(5):1214-1218.
    [6] 郑纪勇,邵明安,张兴昌.黄土区坡面表层土壤容重和饱和导水率空间变异特征[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(3):53-56.
    [7] Julià M F, Monreal T E, del Corral Jiménez A S, et al. Constructing a saturated hydraulic conductivity map of Spain using pedotransfer functions and spatial prediction[J]. Geoderma, 2004, 123(3/4):257-277.
    [8] 刘元波,陈荷生,高前兆,等.沙地降雨入渗水分动态[J].中国沙漠,1995,12(2):143-150.
    [9] 汤英,周宏飞,徐利岗.荒漠植被影响下的沙地稳定入渗率变化特征[J].土壤通报,2009,40(2):235-239.
    [10] 孙蓓,马玉莹,雷廷武,等.农地耕层与犁底层土壤入渗性能的连续测量方法[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(4):118-124.
    [11] Vanderlinden K, Gabriels D, Giráldez J V. Evaluation of infiltration measurements under olive trees in Córdoba[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 1998,48(4):303-315.
    [12] 吴发启,赵西宁,佘雕.坡耕地土壤水分入渗影响因素分析[J].水土保持通报,2003,23(1):16-18.
    [13] 李卓,刘永红,杨勤.土壤水分入渗影响机制研究综述[J].灌溉排水学报,2011,30(5):124-130.
    [14] 李卓,吴普特,冯浩,等.不同黏粒含量土壤水分入渗能力模拟试验研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(3):71-77.
    [15] 周宏飞,汤英,周宝佳.荒漠灌木及冻融影响下的风沙土入渗特征[C]//土壤资源持续利用和生态环境安全:中国土壤学会第十一届二次理事扩大会议暨学术会议论文集.2009.
    [16] Helalia A M. The relation between soil infiltration and effective porosity in different soils[J]. Agricultural water Management, 1993,24(1):39-47.
    [17] 莫斌,陈晓燕,杨以翠,等.不同土地利用类型土壤入渗性能及其影响因素研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(1):13-17.
    [18] 姚淑霞,赵传成,张铜会.科尔沁不同沙地土壤饱和导水率比较研究[J].土壤学报,2013,50(3):469-477.
    [19] 张强,孙向阳,黄利江,等.毛乌素沙地土壤水分特征曲线和入渗性能的研究[J].林业科学研究,2004,17(S1):9-14.
    [20] 陈娟,陈林,宋乃平,等.荒漠草原不同土壤类型水分入渗特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):18-23.
    [21] 刘目兴,杜文正,张海林.三峡库区不同林型土壤的入渗能力研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(3):299-306.
    [22] 武敏,冯绍元,孙春燕,等.北京市大兴区典型土壤水分入渗规律田间试验研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2009,14(4):98-102.
    [23] Wang T, Zlotnik V A, Wedin D, et al. Spatial trends in saturated hydraulic conductivity of vegetated dunes in the Nebraska Sand Hills:Effects of depth and topography[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2008,349(1/2):88-97.
    [24] 赵景波,马延东,邢闪,等.腾格里沙漠宁夏回族自治区中卫市沙层水分入渗研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3):12-16.
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

印家旺,阿拉木萨,苏宇航,蒋绍妍.科尔沁沙地不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征比较研究[J].水土保持通报英文版,2022,42(4):90-98

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:381
  • PDF: 621
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:January 04,2022
  • Revised:February 14,2022
  • Online: September 23,2022