Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Benefits of Forest Ecosystem in New Urban Karst Areas of Central Guizhou Province
Author:
Clc Number:

S157.1

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [27]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] Soil and water conservation and ecological benefits of forest ecosystem in the new urban karst areas of Guanshanhu District, Guiyang City in Central Guizhou Province were studied to scientifically evaluate the achievements of ecological construction, and to provide a scientific reference for the sustainable utilization of resources and the environment, and high-quality development of forests in new urban karst areas.[Methods] The distribution patterns of forest ecosystems at Guanshanhu District at 2000, 2010, and 2020 were extracted by using multi-source remote sensing data. The soil conservation and regulating water amount were calculated by a soil conservation model and the water balance equation. The ecological benefit value was calculated using the market value method and the shadow engineering method.[Results] ① The area of the forest ecosystem at Guanshanhu District increased from 10 892.74 hm2 to 15 571.90 hm2 during 2000-2010. Forest area decreased with the acceleration of urban expansion, and was 13 937.54 hm2 by 2020. Due to the opposing influences of ecological engineering and urban expansion, the forest ecosystem has changed greatly during the past 20 years. ② The value of soil and fertilizer conservation and water regulation in the forest ecosystem generally showed an increasing trend, and the ecological benefits per unit area increased. However, due to the decrease in forest ecosystem area, the ecological benefits of soil and fertilizer conservation and water regulation increased slowly. ③ Soil conservation per unit area followed the order of coniferous forest>mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forest>shrub forest>broad-leaved forest>other forest. The regulated water amount followed the order of coniferous forest>broad-leaved forest>mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forest>shrub forest>other forest. The total value of the ecological benefits of soil fertility and water regulation in coniferous forest was the largest, followed by shrub forest. Shrub forest played a very important role in soil fertility and water regulation.[Conclusion] The forest ecosystem changed greatly at Guanshanhu District, and the area increased significantly from 2000 to 2010, but exhibited a decreasing trend in recent years. However, the per unit area ecological benefits increased continuously, and played an important role in soil and fertilizer conservation and water regulation. Forest ecosystem protection should be given great importance in the development of new urban areas.

    Reference
    [1] Guo Zhongsheng. Soil hydrology process and sustainable use of soil water resources in desert regions[J]. Water, 2021,13(17):2377.
    [2] 戴全厚,严友进.西南喀斯特石漠化与水土流失研究进展[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):1-10.
    [3] 王世杰.喀斯特石漠化——中国西南最严重的生态地质环境问题[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2003,32(2):120-126.
    [4] Li R, Li Q, Pan L. Review of organic mulching effects on soil and water loss[J]. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2021,67(1):136-151.
    [5] 黄会前,何腾兵,牟力.贵州母岩(母质)对土壤类型及分布的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2016,57(11):1816-1820.
    [6] 张信宝.贵州石漠化治理的历程,成效,存在问题与对策建议[J].中国岩溶,2016,35(5):497-502.
    [7] 颜萍,熊康宁,王恒松,等.喀斯特地区水土流失与水土保持研究进展[J].中国水土保持,2016(1):54-59.
    [8] 熊康宁,李晋,龙明忠.典型喀斯特石漠化治理区水土流失特征与关键问题[J].地理学报,2012,67(7):878-888.
    [9] 宋同清,彭晚霞,杜虎,等.中国西南喀斯特石漠化时空演变特征,发生机制与调控对策[J].生态学报,2014,34(18):5328-5341.
    [10] 王恒松,熊康宁,刘云.喀斯特区地下水土流失机理研究[J].中国水土保持,2009(8):11-14.
    [11] 唐益群,张晓晖,周洁,等.喀斯特石漠化地区土壤地下漏失的机理研究:以贵州普定县陈旗小流域为例[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(2):121-127.
    [12] 高华端,李锐.贵州省地质背景下的区域水土流失特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4(4):26-32.
    [13] 周运超,王世杰,卢红梅.喀斯特石漠化过程中土壤的空间分布[J].地球与环境,2010,38(1):1-7.
    [14] 史鹏韬,刘子琦,李开萍.贵州省水土流失时空变化特征[J].地球与环境,2019,47(5):586-593.
    [15] 杨青,杨广斌,赵青松,等.喀斯特地区不同降雨和植被覆盖的坡面产流产沙特征[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(1):9-16.
    [16] 赵海兵,安裕伦,夏品华,等.基于GIS的喀斯特流域土壤侵蚀模数估算:以贵阳麦西河流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):99-103.
    [17] Bai X Y, Wang S J, Xiong K N. Assessing spatial-temporal evolution processes of karst rocky desertification land:indications for restoration strategies[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2013,24(1):47-56.
    [18] 孙德亮,赵卫权,李威,等.基于GIS与RUSLE模型的喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀研究:以贵州省为例[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(3):271-276.
    [19] 王志杰,代磊.黔中喀斯特山地城市土地利用/覆被变化及其生态效应评价:以贵阳市花溪区为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(9):3429-3440.
    [20] Xiuqina W, Yunlong C, Tao Z. Effects of land use/land cover changes on rocky desertification-a case study of a small karst catchment in Southwestern China[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011,5:1-5.
    [21] 颜萍,熊康宁,檀迪,等.喀斯特石漠化治理不同水土保持模式的生态效应研究[J].贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版,2016,34(1):1-7.
    [22] 张芳挺,熊康宁,陈浒,等.喀斯特高原山地水土流失影响因素及生态效益评价:以贵州毕节石桥小流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(5):88-92.
    [23] 吴鹏,朱军,崔迎春,等.喀斯特地区石漠化综合治理生态效益指标体系构建及评价:以杠寨小流域为例[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2014,34(10):95-101.
    [24] 国家林业和草原局.GB/T38582-2020森林生态系统服务功能评估规范[EB/OL].http://www.sdlycyw.com/site/content/266.html.
    [25] 江忠善,刘志,贾志伟.地形因素与坡地水土流失关系的研究[J].水土保持研究,1990(2):1-8.
    [26] 刘宝元,谢云,张科利.土壤侵蚀预报模型[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2001.
    [27] Budyko M I. Climate and Life[M]. San Diego, California, USA:Academic Press, 1974.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

李亦秋,邓欧,李若霜,吴亚琳,靳羽,代正娇,肖丽.黔中喀斯特城市新区森林生态系统水土保持及其生态效益[J].水土保持通报英文版,2022,42(4):244-250

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:474
  • PDF: 702
  • HTML: 927
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:April 24,2022
  • Revised:May 10,2022
  • Online: September 23,2022