Main Soil Nutrient Characteristics of Cultivated Land in Surface Tension Fracture Area of Huaibei Mining Area
Author:
Clc Number:

S152.9, X825

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [39]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The influences of surface tension fractures caused by coal mining subsidence on the soil quality of cultivated land were analyzed, and the changes in soil nutrients before and after coal mining subsidence were quantified, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the pre-mining and in-mining management of land in the subsidence area. [Methods] The study was conducted in the surface tension fracture area of the Suntuan Mine in the Huaibei mining area. Samples were collected before subsidence (April 2019), and after sibsidence (December 2019, July 2020). Five sampling points were randomly located before subsidence. Two typical longitudinal tension fractures were selected after subsidence, and the subsidence area was divided into three zones from the top to the bottom of the subsidence slope. Thirteen sampling points were located on both sides of each fracture. At each sampling point, one soil sample was collected every 20 cm of soil depth. Sample collection was completed in December 2019 and July 2020. Six soil indicators were monitored: water content, organic matter, fast-acting potassium, fast-acting phosphorus, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus. [Results] There were significant differences in soil moisture content, organic matter, available potassium, and total phosphorus between the two samplings in the tension fracture area (p<0.01), but there were no significant differences in available phosphorus and total nitrogen (p>0.05). Principal component analysis showed that the first principal components were organic matter, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus (positive), and the second principal components were water content and fast-acting potassium (negative). Based on the comprehensive nutrient evaluation-principal component score analysis, the integrated nutrient score increased with time. However, the nutrients in the tension fracture zone gradually increased from the top to the bottom of the subsidence slope. [Conclusion] Surface tension fractures were widely distributed in the coal mining subsidence area, leading to a decline in soil quality.

    Reference
    [1] Dodson J, Li Xiaoqiang, Sun Nan, et al. Use of coal in the bronze age in China [J]. The Holocene, 2014,24(5):525-530.
    [2] 陈超,胡振琪.我国采动地裂缝形成机理研究进展[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(3):810-823.
    [3] 张敬凯,母晓培,侯合明,等.大峪沟矿区采煤塌陷对土壤含水率的影响[J].矿山测量,2017,45(1):59-61.
    [4] 祝宇成,王金满,白中科,等.采煤塌陷对土壤理化性质影响的研究进展[J].土壤,2016,48(1):22-28.
    [5] Jing Zhaorui, Wang Jinman, Zhu Yucheng, et al. Effects of land subsidence resulted from coal mining on soil nutrient distributions in a loess area of China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,177:350-361.
    [6] Ma Kang, Zhang Yuxiu, Ruan Mengying, et al. Land subsidence in a coal mining area reduced soil fertility and led to soil degradation in arid and semi-arid regions [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019,16(20):3929.
    [7] 谢放放,李保莲,焦俊党,等.开采沉陷区土壤特性空间变化及其作物响应[J].河南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2021,40(4):89-97.
    [8] 陈孝杨,周育智,于佳禾,等.砂姜黑土区采煤塌陷坡耕地氮磷时空分布与流失特征[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(2):236-240.
    [9] 孟红旗,郭晓明,杨英,等.采煤沉陷坡面土壤氮磷钾养分有效性的空间变异性[J].土壤学报,2020,57(4):844-854.
    [10] 孟红旗,熊仁鹏,王崇,等.采煤沉陷区不同土地利用类型土壤水分、有机质和质地的空间变异性[J].土壤学报,2018,55(4):911-922.
    [11] 吴群英,冯泽伟,胡振琪,等.生态脆弱矿区地表裂缝动态变化对土壤含水量的影响[J].煤炭科学技术,2020,48(4):148-155.
    [12] Luo Zhanbin, Ma Jing, Chen Fu, et al. Cracks reinforce the interactions among soil bacterial communities in the coal mining area of loess plateau, China [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019,16(24):4892.
    [13] 骆占斌.黄土高原矿区采煤扰动后土壤微生物群落结构变化及驱动机制研究[D].江苏徐州:中国矿业大学,2019.
    [14] 卢全中,李聪,刘聪,等.地裂缝分类及地面沉降区构造地裂缝防治对策[J].地球科学与环境学报,2021,43(2):366-375.
    [15] 范廷玉,钟建,王顺,等.高潜水位矿区地表拉张裂隙区土壤特征研究[J].安徽理工大学学报(自然科学版),2021,41(3):15-21.
    [16] 李阳,郑刘根,程桦,等.采煤沉陷区表层土壤氮、磷和有机质分布特征及相关性分析[J].环境污染与防治,2015,37(10):52-57.
    [17] 曹振环,王金满,刘鹏,等.采煤塌陷区农田整治规划设计技术的研究进展[J].江西农业大学学报,2016,38(4):782-791.
    [18] 冯宇.淮北矿区地表拉张裂隙发育特征及防控技术研究[D].安徽淮南:安徽理工大学,2020.
    [19] 中国环境监测总站,南京市环境监测中心站.土壤环境监测技术规范:HJ/T 166-2004[S].国家环境保护局发布,2012.
    [20] 农业部环境保护科研监测所.农田土壤环境质量监测技术规范:NY/T 395-2012[S].中华人民共和国农业部发布,2012.
    [21] 刘英,雷少刚,宫传刚,等.采煤沉陷裂缝区土壤含水量变化对柠条叶片叶绿素荧光的响应[J].生态学报,2019,39(9):3267-3276.
    [22] 毕银丽,伍越,张健,等.采用HYDRUS模拟采煤沉陷地裂缝区土壤水盐运移规律[J].煤炭学报,2020,45(1):360-367.
    [23] 徐建明,张甘霖,谢正苗.土壤质量指标与评价[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
    [24] 姜霓雯,童根平,叶正钱,等.浙江清凉峰自然保护区土壤肥力指标空间变异及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2022,42(6):2430-2441.
    [25] 王佟,章梅,徐辉,等.青海木里煤田聚乎更矿区土壤肥力及重金属风险评价[J].煤田地质与勘探,2022,52(4):113-120.
    [26] 谢晓梅.土壤与植物营养学实验[M].浙江杭州:浙江大学出版社,2014.
    [27] 鲍士旦主编.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
    [28] 林圣玉,李英,张华明,等.鄱阳湖区坡耕地土壤肥力质量评价[J].中国水土保持,2018(11):60-63.
    [29] 张凯旋,商侃侃,达良俊.上海环城林带不同植物群落土壤质量综合评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(3):71-77.
    [30] 陈永春,赵萍,郑刘根,等.淮南潘一矿采煤沉陷复垦区土壤肥力时空变化特征[J].环境监测管理与技术,2021,33(3):21-24.
    [31] 赵士诚,曹彩云,李科江,等.长期秸秆还田对华北潮土肥力、氮库组分及作物产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(6):1441-1449.
    [32] 薛海龙,许文年,刘大翔.两种边坡生态修复模式土壤肥力与酶活性的变化[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(4):182-187.
    [33] Guo Xiaoming, Zhao Tongqian, Chang Wenke, et al. Evaluating the effect of coal mining subsidence on the agricultural soil quality using principal component analysis [J]. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 2018,78(2):173-182.
    [34] Zhang Shaoliang, Jiang Lili, Liu Xiaobing, et al. Soil nutrient variance by slope position in a Mollisol farmland area of Northeast China [J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2016,26(4):508-517.
    [35] Shi Peili, Zhang Yuxiu, Hu Zhenqi, et al. The response of soil bacterial communities to mining subsidence in the West China aeolian sand area [J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2017,121:1-10.
    [36] Zhen Qing, Ma Wenmei, Li Mingming, et al. Effects of vegetation and physicochemical properties on solute transport in reclaimed soil at an opencast coal mine site on the Loess Plateau, China [J]. Catena, 2015,133:403-411.
    [37] 马康,杨帆,张玉秀.西北干旱半干旱区煤炭井工开采对土壤肥力质量的影响研究进展[J].中国科学院大学学报,2020,37(4):442-449.
    [38] 崔鲁楠.淮南矿区不同塌陷类型土壤典型特性研究[D].安徽合肥:安徽大学,2016.
    [39] 郑海金,王辉文,杨洁,等.地表径流和壤中流对坡耕地氮磷流失影响研究概述[J].中国水土保持,2015(2):36-39.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

范廷玉,陈迎香,路啊康,颜昭耀,赵一凡,严家平,王顺,王兴明,魏祥平,张燕海.淮北矿区地表拉张裂隙区耕地土壤主要养分特征[J].水土保持通报英文版,2023,43(1):8-15,23

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:246
  • PDF: 617
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:July 02,2022
  • Revised:July 25,2022
  • Online: April 08,2023