Constructionof Watershed Ecological Network BasedonSpatial Syntax——Taking Dianchi Lake Basinasa CaseStudy
Author:
Clc Number:

X826

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [27]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The Dianchi Lake ecological corridor, the ecological nodes and obstacles were identified, and then the ecological network of the watershed was optimized in order to provide a reference for the maintenance and improvement of the ecological function of the ecological migration corridor in the Dianchi Lake basin. [Methods] The study was conducted for the Dianchi Lake basin. Morphological spatial pattern analysis was combined with circuit theory to identify the ecological sources, pinch points, and obstacle areas in the study area, and to construct an ecological network. At the same time, spatial syntax was introduced to quantify the road network in order to optimize the electrical resistance surface. The back resistance surface and the ecological network were compared to determine the impact of the road network on the ecological network. [Results] ① The overall ecological source area accounted for a relatively high proportion of the total study area. The 17 extracted ecological source areas had an area of 101 248 hm2 and accounted for 34.7% of the total area of the study area, mainly located in the northern mountainous area and the central area around Dianchi Lake; ② The optimized high resistance area of the resistive force surface was transferred from the surrounding area to the main urban area, and the number of corridors increased from 35 to 41. The total length increased from 185.9 km to 216.2 km. The degree of network closure, connection degree, and connection rate were increased by 0.20, 0.35, and 0.13, respectively; ③ The corridor width was determined to be 600 m through the threshold analysis of corridor width. 15 116 hm2 of ecological pinch points and 71 875 hm2 of ecological barrier areas were extracted form the Dianchi Lake Basin ecological safety network. [Conclusion] The fragmentation of ecological patches in the Dianchi Lake basin was obvious, and their distribution showed the characteristics of dense ecological foci in the north and sparse ecological foci in the south. The cutting effect of high-grade and high-traffic roads on the ecological network was very prominent, and these kinds of pinch points and obstacle areas should be given greater attention in the construction and restoration of ecological networks.

    Reference
    [1] 吴敏,吴晓勤.基于“生态融城”理念的城市生态网络规划探索:兼论空间规划中生态功能的分割与再联系[J].城市规划,2018,42(7):9-17.
    [2] 李久林,徐建刚,储金龙.基于Circuit理论的城市生态安全格局研究:以安庆市为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(8):1812-1824.
    [3] Yu Kongjian. Security patterns and surface model in landscape ecological planning [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1996,36(1):1-17.
    [4] 彭建,郭小楠,胡熠娜,等.基于地质灾害敏感性的山地生态安全格局构建:以云南省玉溪市为例[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(2):627-635.
    [5] 杨凯,曹银贵,冯喆,等.基于最小累积阻力模型的生态安全格局构建研究进展[J].生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(5):555-565.
    [6] Mann D, Agrawal G, Joshi P K. Spatio-temporal forest cover dynamics along road networks in the Central Himalaya [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2019,127:383-393.
    [7] 汪勇政,李久林,顾康康,等.基于形态学空间格局分析法的城市绿色基础设施网络格局优化:以合肥市为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(5):2022-2032.
    [8] 王雪然,万荣荣,潘佩佩.太湖流域生态安全格局构建与调控:基于空间形态学—最小累积阻力模型[J].生态学报,2022,42(5):1968-1980.
    [9] 杨超,戴菲,陈明,等.基于MSPA和电路理论的武汉市生态网络优化研究[C]//中国风景园林学会2020年会论文集(下册).成都,2020:236-240.
    [10] 费凡,尹海伟,孔繁花,等.基于二维与三维信息的南京市主城区生态网络格局对比分析[J].生态学报,2020,40(16):5534-5545.
    [11] 杨晨雪.路网中心性与用地分布格局相关性研究[D].湖北武汉:武汉大学,2018.
    [12] 倪庆琳,丁忠义,侯湖平,等.基于电路理论的生态格局识别与保护研究: 以宁武县为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(5):67-73.
    [13] 黄颙昊,杨新苗,岳锦涛.基于多尺度地理加权回归模型的城市道路骑行流量分析[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2022,62(7):1132-1141.
    [14] 涂文姬,杨启鸿,刘波,等.滇池越冬水鸟同步调查研究[J].林业调查规划,2017,42(6):52-57.
    [15] 如克亚·热合曼,阿里木江·卡斯木,哈力木拉提·阿布来提.基于MSPA和MCR模型的图木舒克市生态安全格局构建[J].环境科学与技术,2021,44(5):229-237.
    [16] 陈竹安,马彬彬,危小建,等.基于MSPA和MCR模型的南昌市生态网络构建与优化[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(6):139-147.
    [17] Kim D, Shin W, Choi H, et al. Estimation of ecological connectivity in a city based on land cover and urban habitat maps [J]. Sustainability, 2020,12(22):9529.
    [18] 谢于松,王倩娜,罗言云.基于MSPA的市域尺度绿色基础设施评价指标体系构建及应用:以四川省主要城市为例[J].中国园林,2020,36(7):87-92.
    [19] Doyle P, Snell J. Random Walks and Electric Networks [C]//Carus Mathematical, 1984.
    [20] Karlson M, Mörtberg U, Balfors B. Road ecology in environmental impact assessment [J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2014,48:10-19.
    [21] 陈瑶瑶,罗志军,齐松,等.基于生态敏感性与生态网络的南昌市生态安全格局构建[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(4):342-349.
    [22] 陈群,刘平辉,朱传民.基于MCR模型的江西省抚州市生态安全格局构建[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(2):210-218.
    [23] 张亚丽,尹伟特,胡希军,等.基于MSPA与MCR模型的资源节约型生态网络构建: 以福建省东山岛为例[J].西北林学院学报,2021,36(5):254-261.
    [24] Guo Xinya, Zhang Xingqi, Du Shixun, et al. The impact of onshore wind power projects on ecological corridors and landscape connectivity in Shanxi, China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,254:120075.
    [25] 刘佳,尹海伟,孔繁花,等.基于电路理论的南京城市绿色基础设施格局优化[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4363-4372.
    [26] 汉瑞英,赵志平,肖能文,等.基于最小累积阻力差值模型的北京市生态安全格局构建[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(3):95-102.
    [27] 朱强,俞孔坚,李迪华.景观规划中的生态廊道宽度[J].生态学报,2005,25(9):2406-2412.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

金满库,颜蔚,邹辉,葛小三,王佳恒.结合空间句法的流域生态网络构建——以滇池流域为例[J].水土保持通报英文版,2023,43(1):133-140

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:April 24,2022
  • Revised:June 22,2022
  • Online: April 08,2023