Potential Evaluation and Type Identification of Rural Vitalization in Hilly and Mountainous Villages in South China—A Case Study at Xingguo County, Jiangxi Province
Author:
Clc Number:

F319.9, F327

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [31]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The village type identification was carried out scientifically to provide technical support and a decision-making reference for the formulation of the overall territorial space planning and the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy for Xingguo County, Jiangxi Province, in order to provide experience reference for the village type identification in the hills and mountains in Southern China. [Methods] Villages were taken as the research units. A village layout suitability evaluation index system and a rural revitalization potential evaluation index system were constructed. The village types in Xingguo County were identified by combining the AHP and CRITIC methods to determine the index weight. A coupling coordination model was constructed. [Results] ① The overall village layout suitability in Xingguo County was in the general level, and the suitability grades were mainly in the middle suitability level, with significant differences in spatial distribution, showing the spatial characteristics of “decreasing in a stepwise manner from the central part of the city to the surrounding areas”. ② The overall level of rural revitalization potential needs to be improved. The high-level areas were mainly located in the villages surrounding the urban areas and the resident villages of each township. ③ The coupling degree between the suitability of village layout and rural revitalization was high. The coordination degree needs to be improved from the average coupling coordination degree, with the largest number of villages at the primary coupling coordination degree. ④ The types of villages in Xingguo County were identified as suburban integration villages, clustered development villages, survival and upgrading villages, characteristic protection villages, and relocated and evacuated villages. Corresponding development strategies were proposed for different types of villages. [Conclusion] Village layout was closely related to local topography and social and economic development. The potential of rural revitalization was positively correlated with the suitability of rural layout. Therefore, different development strategies should be proposed for different village types.

    Reference
    [1] 黄道涵,温锋华,陈慧霞.基于多因子分析的村庄布局优化路径研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(S1):464-468.
    [2] 杨晓娟,杨永春.乡村振兴背景下关中地区县域村庄布局规划策略探析:以韩城市为例[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(2):127-134.
    [3] 唐秀美,刘玉,任艳敏.基于适宜性与发展水平评价的村庄用地类型划分[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(1):283-291.
    [4] 陈伟强,代亚强,耿艺伟,等.基于POI数据和引力模型的村庄分类方法研究[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(10):195-204.
    [5] 林孝松,王莹,余情,等.奉节县村庄发展潜力评价与类型识别[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(3):320-328.
    [6] 杨绪红,吴晓莉,范渊,等.规划引导下利津县村庄分类与整治策略[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(5):232-241.
    [7] 唐林楠,刘玉,潘瑜春,等.基于BP模型和Ward法的北京市平谷区乡村地域功能评价与分区[J].地理科学,2016,36(10):1514-1521.
    [8] 韩欣宇,闫凤英.乡村振兴背景下乡村发展综合评价及类型识别研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(9):156-165.
    [9] 牛子浩,周忠发,朱昌丽,等.喀斯特山区乡村性空间分异及发展类型:以贵州省盘州市为例[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(3):316-324.
    [10] 房艳刚,刘建志.东北地区县域粮劳变化耦合模式与乡村发展类型[J].地理学报,2020,75(10):2241-2255.
    [11] 黄亚平,郑有旭.江汉平原乡村聚落形态类型及空间体系特征[J].地理科学,2021,41(1):121-128.
    [12] 璩路路,李裕瑞,李琳娜,等.农牧交错带乡村空间发展类型及影响因素研究[J].经济地理,2019,39(10):153-161.
    [13] 曾灿,李伯华,李翠菲,等.欠发达地区村庄发展类型识别与振兴对策:以湘西州凤凰县为例[J].经济地理,2021,41(12):167-176.
    [14] 徐维祥,李露,周建平,等.乡村振兴与新型城镇化耦合协调的动态演进及其驱动机制[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(9):2044-2062.
    [15] 任祁荣,于恩逸.甘肃省生态环境与社会经济系统协调发展的耦合分析[J].生态学报,2021,41(8):2944-2953.
    [16] 屠爽爽,郑瑜晗,龙花楼,等.乡村发展与重构格局特征及振兴路径:以广西为例[J].地理学报,2020,75(2):365-381.
    [17] 刘健,郭璨,刘亚秋,等.平原农区适宜性—集约性耦合协调的乡村空间重构[J].农业资源与环境学报,2022,39(2):394-405.
    [18] 侯淑涛,丁玲,陈建龙,等.基于组合特征的黑龙江省村庄用地整理分区研究[J].农业现代化研究,2020,41(3):520-529.
    [19] 周智,贾丽,黄英,等.农村居民点整治工程选址适宜性评价与决策[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(1):323-326.
    [20] 王梦婧,吕悦风,吴次芳,等.国土空间规划背景下的县域村庄分类模式研究: 以山东省莱州市为例[J].城市发展研究,2020,27(9):1-7.
    [21] 孟秋莉.基于PSR模型的乡村旅游环境保护评价指标体系研究[J].生态经济,2017,33(4):121-126.
    [22] 欧维新,邹怡,刘敬杰,等.基于乡村振兴潜力和土地利用效率的村庄分类研究[J].上海城市规划,2021(6):15-21.
    [23] 郑兴明.基于分类推进的乡村振兴潜力评价指标体系研究:来自福建省3县市6个村庄的调查数据[J].社会科学,2019(6):36-47.
    [24] 张丽,周国华,刘李勇,等.湖南省乡村发展潜力评价及其障碍度诊断[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2022,45(2):1-11.
    [25] 马力阳,罗其友,李同昇,等.半干旱区水资源—乡村发展耦合协调评价与实证研究:以通辽市为例[J].经济地理,2017,37(9):152-159.
    [26] 王淑佳,孔伟,任亮,等.国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(3):793-810.
    [27] 蒲金芳,王亚楠,张蚌蚌,等.赣东山地丘陵区土地利用多功能与乡村发展的时空耦合关系[J].中国农业大学学报,2022,27(4):256-269.
    [28] 冯丹玥,金晓斌,梁鑫源,等.基于“类型—等级—潜力”综合视角的村庄特征识别与整治对策[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(8):226-237.
    [29] 么泽恩,蔡海生,张学玲,等.基于CRITIC-TOPSIS模型的浮梁县土地生态安全时空分异及其障碍因素分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(10):2452-2463.
    [30] 刘淑茹,魏晓晓.基于改进CRITIC法的西部地区新型城镇化水平测度[J].生态经济,2019,35(7):98-102.
    [31] 李裕瑞,卜长利,曹智,等.面向乡村振兴战略的村庄分类方法与实证研究[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(2):243-256.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

雷凯星,余敦,王检萍,赵琪琛,王春刚,罗恬欣.南方丘陵山区村域乡村振兴潜力评价及类型识别——以江西省兴国县为例[J].水土保持通报英文版,2023,43(1):281-290,423

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1150
  • PDF: 765
  • HTML: 833
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:April 01,2022
  • Revised:July 19,2022
  • Online: April 08,2023