Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Land Ecological Security and Rural Revitalization Coordination in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
Author:
Clc Number:

X826, F327

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [17]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The level and coordination of spatial and temporal characteristics of land ecological security and rural revitalization and development in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from 2010 to 2020 were studied in order to promote land ecological security protection and to improve the level of rural revitalization and development, resulting in coordinated development of both factors. [Methods] We analyzed data from 14 cities in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region to build an index system. The comprehensive measurement level and coupling coordination model were used for analysis. [Results] ① The level of land ecological security increased over time. ② The overall development level of rural revitalization initially declined and then increased, but the development level of each city was different. ③ The coordination degree changed in the form of “uneven rise and fall”. The level of coordination degree was distributed in a trend of gradual increase from east and west to the central region, from inland to the coast, and from the central region to the north. The development pattern was “low from east to west, high from south to north”. ④ Different development modes and development centers should be adopted according to the regional types of the 14 cities. [Conclusion] Coordinated development of land ecological security and rural revitalization in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region has not been stable. In the future, we should strengthen the integrated development of land ecological security and rural revitalization in low-level coordination areas, and combine them with policies, people’s livelihood, and development promotion measures to improve the coordination level between the two factors. At the same time, we should stabilize the coordinated development between the two factors in mature areas to prevent loss of existing coordinated development.

    Reference
    [1] 李倩娜,唐洪松.沱江流域城市生态安全评价及其耦合特征分析[J].生态经济,2021,37(12):91-97,114.
    [2] 吕洁华,蔡秀亭.中国省域森林生态安全与林业产业结构时空耦合测度[J].世界林业研究,2019,32(4):34-39.
    [3] 张焱文,王枫.2000—2018年广东省土地生态安全与经济发展耦合协调分析[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(1):242-249.
    [4] 刘胜峰,闫文德.漓江流域土地生态安全时空分异及其影响因素[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2021,41(11):136-151.
    [5] 罗斌,杨雄,何毅.基于耦合赋权法与灰色关联法在小流域生态安全评价中的应用[J].三峡大学学报:自然科学版,2020,42(1):7-12.
    [6] 熊建华,唐将伟.广州市土地生态安全与社会经济发展耦合协调研究[J].安全与环境学报,2019,19(2):615-620.
    [7] 罗海平,余兆鹏,邹楠.我国粮食主产区生态与粮食安全耦合协调分析:基于1995—2015年面板数据[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(10):32-39.
    [8] 薛建春,曹力博.2001—2020年包头市土地利用转型演变特征与生态安全影响[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(1):273-282.
    [9] 闻熠,肖涛,谈晟荟,等.基于熵值—突变级数法上海市生态安全评价与对策研究[J].生态科学,2022,41(3):124-132.
    [10] 姜正君.脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴的衔接贯通:逻辑、难题与路径[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,41(12):107-113.
    [11] 纪志耿,罗倩倩.习近平关于乡村振兴重要论述的发展脉络与创新性贡献[J].经济学家,2022(4):5-16.
    [12] 徐维祥,李露,周建平,等.乡村振兴与新型城镇化耦合协调的动态演进及其驱动机制[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(9):2044-2062.
    [13] 徐雪,王永瑜.中国省域新型城镇化、乡村振兴与经济增长质量耦合协调发展及影响因素分析[J].经济问题探索,2021(10):13-26.
    [14] 陈志军,徐飞雄.乡村旅游地旅游发展对乡村振兴的影响效应与机理:以关中地区为例[J].经济地理,2022,42(2):231-240.
    [15] 李文辉,周兴,钟锦玲.2009—2018年中国农用地多功能利用与乡村发展的时空耦合关系[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(5):244-254.
    [16] 何田,廖和平,孙平军,等.西南贫困山区乡村振兴潜力与劳动力资源耦合关系:以贵州省望谟县为例[J].地域研究与开发,2022,41(1):145-150.
    [17] 佘茂艳,王元地.科技创新与乡村振兴系统耦合协调发展及影响因素分析[J].统计与决策,2021,37(13):84-88.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

李冰,周兴,陈海萍.广西壮族自治区土地生态安全与乡村振兴协调性的时空特征[J].水土保持通报英文版,2023,43(2):416-424

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1109
  • PDF: 802
  • HTML: 689
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:September 21,2022
  • Revised:March 26,2023
  • Online: June 01,2023