Coupling Coordination Relationship of Land Ecological Security and Prosperity Process at Border Areas in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from 2000 to 2020
Author:
Clc Number:

X321,F124.5

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [22]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The effect of land ecological security at border areas in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, and the process for improving border areas and enriching people were evaluated scientifically, and the coupling coordination mechanism was revealed in order to provide a reference for promoting border revitalization and regional coordinated development.[Methods] The study was conducted for the eight counties in the border areas of Guangxi. We analyzed the spatial-temporal characteristics of the coupling coordination between land ecological security and the process of prospering the frontier and enriching people in Guangxi border areas from 2000 to 2020. We used the entropy weight TOPISIS comprehensive evaluation method and coupling coordination model.[Results] ① The land ecological security index of border areas gradually increased over time, with the overall ecological security index increasing from 0.213 to 0.728. The land ecological security of each county exhibited different growth rates. The regional differences decreased, showing an overall spatial pattern of "high in the north and south, low in the middle". ② The overall coordination level of the process of prospering the frontier and enriching the people has rose from 0.176 to 0.631, following a pattern of "decrease-increase". Regional differences were not obvious. The grade difference of the process of prospering the frontier and enriching the people in each county was not obvious, and the overall pattern changed little. The development advantages of Pingxiang and Dongxing City, which are important national ports, become more and more obvious. ③ The coupling coordination degree of the land ecological security system and the process system of prospering the frontier and enriching the people was increasing day by day, rising from 0.440 to 0.823, and the coupling degree of the two followed a pattern of "decrease-increase". The spatial feature gradually evolved from "overall dispersion" to "high in the north and south, low in the middle". Driven by the "dual-core" radiation of Pingxiang and Dongxing City, the coordination type was gradually evolving from mild disorder and imminent disorder to primary coordination.[Conclusion] The national strategy of prospering the frontier, enriching the people, and ecologically protecting the environment requires strengthening the innovation of border policy, coordinating the superposition effect of multiple factors, and continuously improving the ecological security and happiness index of border residents.

    Reference
    [1] 拓俊杰.中国"兴边富民"行动20载研究回溯与展望:基于知识图谱的可视化分析[J].内蒙古社会科学,2021,42(4):204-212.
    [2] 任宇飞,方创琳,孙思奥,等.城镇化与生态环境近远程耦合关系研究进展[J].地理学报,2020,75(3):589-606.
    [3] Liu Jinhua, Cao Xiangyang, Zhao Lesong, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation of land ecological security and its influencing factors:A case study in Jinan, Shandong Province, China[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022,10:824254.
    [4] 李文辉,周兴,钟锦玲.2009-2018年中国农用地多功能利用与乡村发展的时空耦合关系[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(5):244-254.
    [5] 李龙,吴大放,王芳,等.中国快速城市化区域生态系统服务价值预测及权衡研究:以佛山市为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(24):9023-9036.
    [6] 薛建春,曹力博.2001-2020年包头市土地利用转型演变特征与生态安全影响[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(1):273-282.
    [7] 陕永杰,魏绍康,苗圆,等.基于PSR-TOPSIS模型的"晋陕豫黄河金三角"地区土地生态安全评价[J].生态经济,2022,38(7):205-211.
    [8] Chai Ji, Wang Zhanqi, Yu Chen. Analysis for the interaction relationship between urbanization and ecological security:A case study in Wuhan City circle of China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021,18(24):13187.
    [9] 刘志有,曲秀武,魏冉,等.生态文明视角下的伊犁河谷绿洲土地生态安全评价及障碍因子诊断[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(1):137-143.
    [10] 赵书虹,白梦,阮梦枝,等.云南省旅游资源与生态安全协调发展的时空演化特征及障碍因子分析[J].地理科学,2021,41(3):493-503.
    [11] 王飞.广西兴边富民行动的实施效果评估:基于自然实验的面板数据分析[J].广西社会科学,2014(3):19-23.
    [12] 梁双陆,兰黎娜,杨孟禹.中国兴边富民行动促进边境地区经济增长了吗?:边境地区136个县的"准自然实验"分析[J].广西民族研究,2021(4):160-170.
    [13] 周民良."一带一路"背景下创新体制机制推动兴边富民进程[J].甘肃社会科学,2016(1):67-71.
    [14] 萧子扬.兴边富民行动与乡村振兴战略的内在逻辑关系及有机衔接路径研究[J].广西民族研究,2020(2):129-138.
    [15] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
    [16] 高长波,陈新庚,韦朝海,等.区域生态安全:概念及评价理论基础[J].生态环境,2006,15(1):169-174.
    [17] 呙亚玲,李巧云.基于改进PSR模型的洞庭湖区生态安全评价及主要影响因素分析[J].农业现代化研究,2021,42(1):132-141.
    [18] 陈俊歌,林树高.西南边境地区兴边富民进程与生态文明建设交互关系的时空格局[J].生态经济,2022,38(7):220-229.
    [19] 杨秀敏,耿静,徐游,等.基于TOPSIS模型的海南岛土地综合承载力时空变化及障碍度诊断[J].生态学报,2022,42(22):9324-9334.
    [20] 王淑佳,孔伟,任亮,等.国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(3):793-810.
    [21] 杨亮洁,张小鸿,潘竟虎,等.成渝城市群城镇化与生态环境耦合协调及交互影响[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(3):993-1004.
    [22] 钟锦玲,周兴,李文辉.广西高质量发展与土地资源可持续利用的耦合协调性[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(3):247-257.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

刘少坤,黄荣华,张利国,王鹏程.2000-2020年广西边境地区土地生态安全与兴边富民进程的耦合协调关系[J].水土保持通报英文版,2023,43(3):176-184,300

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:497
  • PDF: 734
  • HTML: 592
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:August 15,2022
  • Revised:October 10,2022
  • Online: August 16,2023