Livelihood Sustainability and Coupling Coordination of Farming Households with Different Grazing Intensities in Loess Hilly Region
Author:
Clc Number:

F592,F323.8

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [30]
  • |
  • Related
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The structure and sustainability of livelihood factors and their coupling coordination under different grazing intensities were studied in order to provide a scientific basis for optimizing the livelihood strategies of farming households, increasing their economic income, and realizing rural revitalization. [Methods] Taking the typical district of loess hilly area as an example, based on the sustainable livelihood framework, constructing the evaluation index system from multiple livelihood elements, combining the survey data of farmers and mathematical modeling, a comprehensive study was conducted on the sustainability of livelihoods of farmers with different grazing intensities and their coupled and coordinated development. [Results] ① Grazing intensity enhanced the sustainability of farmers’ livelihood capital, but there were significant differences in the effects on the sustainability of livelihood environment, livelihood strategies, and livelihood outcomes. ② Livelihood sustainability was highest under moderate grazing intensity, and livelihood capital, livelihood environment, livelihood strategy, and livelihood outcome sustainability increased by 37.86%, 3.83%, 9.92% and 30.45%, respectively, compared with non-grazing farmers. ③ The coupling coordination development characteristics followed the order of moderately grazing farmers > lightly grazing farmers > heavily grazing farmers > non-grazing farmers. Farmers’ livelihood coupling degree was higher than the coordination degree, indicating that the livelihood system of grazing farmers in the loess hilly region had a strong inter-role intensity, and that good coupling and synergistic development within the system had not yet formed. Therefore, it will still be necessary to further strengthen the transformation and upgrading of farmers’ livelihoods to improve their livelihood sustainability in the future. [Conclusion] Moderate grazing can increase livelihood capital and optimize livelihood strategy for farming households in the loess hilly region, and increase the livelihood sustainability and economic income of farming households.

    Reference
    [1] 卜诗洁,卓玛措.可持续生计方法与生计恢复力分析方法的比较[J].地球科学进展,2021,36(11):1127-1136.
    [2] 张芳芳,赵雪雁.我国农户生计转型的生态效应研究综述[J].生态学报,2015,35(10):3157-3164.
    [3] 丁建军,金宁波,贾武,等.武陵山片区城镇化的农户生计响应及影响因素研究:基于3个典型乡镇355户农户调查数据的分析[J].地理研究,2019,38(8):2027-2043.
    [4] 郭秀丽,李旺平,孙国军,等.高寒生态脆弱区农户生计资本及其耦合协调度分析:以甘南州夏河县为例[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(6):330-335.
    [5] 马国璇,周忠发,朱昌丽,等.石漠化地区农户生计资本与生计策略的关系:以贵州省关岭贞丰花江石漠化综合示范区为例[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(2):299-307.
    [6] 赵雪雁.地理学视角的可持续生计研究:现状、问题与领域[J].地理研究,2017,36(10):1859-1872.
    [7] 伍继强,王秀兰,熊根林.基于可持续生计框架的农地整治对农户生计策略的影响研究[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(2):269-277.
    [8] Tang Qing, Bennett S J, Xu Y, et al. Agricultural practices and sustainable livelihoods: rural transformation with in the Loess Plateau, China [J]. Applied Geography, 2013,41:15-23.
    [9] 马国璇,周忠发,朱昌丽,等.改进可持续生计框架下易地扶贫搬迁前后农户生计对比分析:以贵州省贞丰县者相镇安置点为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2022,43(5):207-217.
    [10] 赵雪雁,刘江华,王伟军,等.贫困山区脱贫农户的生计可持续性及生计干预:以陇南山区为例[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(6):982-995.
    [11] 刘璐璐,李锋瑞.黄土高原退耕农户生计资本对生计策略的影响:以甘肃会宁县为例[J].中国沙漠,2020,40(1):233-244.
    [12] 李树茁,梁义成, MARCUS W,等.退耕还林政策对农户生计的影响研究:基于家庭结构视角的可持续生计分析[J].公共管理学报,2010,7(2):1-10.
    [13] 汤青,徐勇,李扬.黄土高原农户可持续生计评估及未来生计策略:基于陕西延安市和宁夏固原市1076户农户调查[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(2):161-169.
    [14] 程积民,万惠娥,胡相明,等.半干旱区封禁草地凋落物的积累与分解[J].生态学报,2006,26(4):1207-1212.
    [15] 王雅舒,李小雁,石芳忠,等.退耕还林还草工程加剧黄土高原退耕区蒸散发[J].科学通报,2019,64(S1):588-599.
    [16] Zhao Yunge, Xu Mingxiang. Runoff and soil loss from revegetated grasslands in Hilly Loess Plateau after a long-term vegetation rehabilitation [J]. Hydrological Processes, 2013,18(4):387-393.
    [17] 李鑫,杨新军,陈佳,等.基于农户生计的乡村能源消费模式研究:以陕南金丝峡乡村旅游地为例[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(3):384-396.
    [18] 王晗,房艳刚.山区农户生计转型及其可持续性研究—河北围场县腰站镇的案例[J].经济地理,2021,41(3):152-160.
    [19] 温腾飞,石育中,杨新军,等.黄土高原半干旱区农户生计恢复力及其影响因素研究:以榆中县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(5):172-182.
    [20] 谢旭轩,张世秋,朱山涛.退耕还林对农户可持续生计的影响[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2010,46(3):457-464.
    [21] 韩文文,刘小鹏,裴银宝,等.不同地貌背景下民族村农户生计脆弱性及其影响因子[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(4):1229-1240.
    [22] 何仁伟,李光勤,刘运伟,等.基于可持续生计的精准扶贫分析方法及应用研究:以四川凉山彝族自治州为例[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(2):182-192.
    [23] 王鹏,王亚娟,刘小鹏,等.基于PSR模型的青铜峡市土地生态安全评价与预测[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(2):148-153.
    [24] 王淑佳,孔伟,任亮,等.国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(3):793-810.
    [25] 王勇,孙瑞欣.土地利用变化对区域水—能源—粮食系统耦合协调度的影响:以京津冀城市群为研究对象[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(3):582-599.
    [26] 廖重斌.环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系:以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J].热带地理,1999,19(2):171-177.
    [27] 钞锦龙,李乐乐,杨朔,等.汾河流域城市化与水资源耦合协调关系研究[J].地理科学,2022,42(3):487-496.
    [28] 孙会,赵允格,刘广亮,等.放牧强度对黄土丘陵区草地植物群落特征的影响[J].草地学报,2022,31(6):1-13.
    [29] 赵凌平,谭世图,白欣,等.封育和放牧对黄土高原典型草原繁殖更新的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(9):27-34.
    [30] 程积民,井赵斌,金晶炜,等.黄土高原半干旱区退化草地恢复与利用过程研究[J].中国科学(生命科学),2014,44(3):267-279.
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

王鹏,马生丽,许明祥.黄土丘陵区不同放牧强度农户生计可持续性及其耦合协调性[J].水土保持通报英文版,2023,43(4):307-315

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:436
  • PDF: 667
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:November 03,2022
  • Revised:December 18,2022
  • Online: September 27,2023