Spatiotemporal Changes of Sloping Farmland and Their Soil Conservation Effect at Source Area of Weihe River
Author:
Clc Number:

S157.1

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [27]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The spatiotemporal changes of different grades of sloping farmland, the soil conservation effects of different sloping farmland types, and the impact of returning farmland to forest or grassland on sloping farmland and soil conservation at the source area of Weihe River were studied in order to provide a scientific basis for the rational planning and utilization of different sloping farmland resources. [Methods] Land use and topographic data at the source area of Weihe River from 1990 to 2020 were analyzed by superposition analysis, farmland dynamic attitude, land use transfer matrix, and the Chinese soil loss equation. [Results] ① During 1990 to 2020, the area of cultivated land increased slowly, then decreased sharply, and then decreased slowly, with a net decrease of 321.03 km2. Steep slope cultivated land and gentle slope cultivated land were the main types of cultivated land change. ② The temporal and spatial changes of cultivated land were mainly characterized by a small increase in cultivated land from 1990 to 2000, mainly located in Zhangxian County and Minxian County. With the implementation of the grain for green project (GGP), 279.80 km2 of sloping land were transformed into forest and grassland, in which the conversion of cultivated land to grassland was mainly located in Tongwei and Longxi counties, while the conversion of cultivated land to forest land was mainly located in Longxi and Minxian counties. ③ The reclamation of forest and grassland at the source area of Weihe River from 1990 to 2000 reduced soil conservation by 5.52×104 t, while returning farmland to forest and grassland increased soil conservation by 2.21×106 t from 2000 to 2020. The transformation of sloping land with greater than 15° slope could affect changes in soil conservation. [Conclusion] The implementation of GGP has achieved remarkable results at the source area of Weihe River. The area of farmland conversion on steep slopes was the largest from 2000 to 2010. The soil conservation effect on steep slopes was the largest on abandoned land. Steeply sloping farmland will be the main target during the new round of returning farmland.

    Reference
    [1] 杨萌,宋晓鹏,张岩,等.黄土高原丘一区典型流域坡耕地分布及其侵蚀地形特征[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2020,18(6):1-8.
    [2] 蔺鹏飞,张晓萍,刘二佳,等.黄土高原典型流域水沙关系对退耕还林(草)的响应[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(1):1-6.
    [3] 李小芳,王治国,张超,等.西北黄土高原区旱作梯田高质量发展思考[J].水利规划与设计,2022(4):16-19,99.
    [4] 罗光杰,王世杰,李阳兵,等.岩溶地区坡耕地时空动态变化及其生态服务功能评估[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(11):233-243.
    [5] 陈正发,史东梅,何伟,等.1980—2015年云南坡耕地资源时空分布及演变特征分析[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(15):256-265.
    [6] 王祯,吴金华,白帅,等.延安市坡耕地资源时空变化及其土壤侵蚀效应[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(3):1-11.
    [7] Han Ze, Song Wei. Spatiotemporal variations in cropland abandonment in the Guizhou-Guangxi karst mountain area, China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,238:117888.
    [8] Di Baofeng, Yang Zhaotian, Liu Lei, et al. The regionalized ecological, economic and social benefit of China’s sloping cropland erosion control during the 12th five-year plan(2011—2015) [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020,276:111314.
    [9] 蒲金涌,张强.渭河上游气候因子变化特征及其与径流量的关系[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(3):95-99.
    [10] 定西市人民政府.甘肃定西渭河源区水源涵养提升山水林田湖草沙一体化保护和修复工程实施方案[R].甘肃定西:定西市人民政府,2021.
    [11] 赵婷婷,肖超,张方哲,等.甘肃渭河源区山水林田湖草生态环境问题与生态修复研究[J].矿产勘查,2020,11(12):2823-2827.
    [12] 周添惠,杨磊,赵方凯,等.渭河源流域源汇景观演变对径流泥沙的影响[J].生态学报,2022,42(1):58-66.
    [13] 吴炳方.中华人民共和国土地覆被地图集(1∶1000000)[M].北京:中国地图出版社,2017.
    [14] 中华人民共和国国土资源部.第二次全国土地调查技术规程[R].北京:中华人民共和国国土资源部,2007.
    [15] 刘宝元,毕小刚,符素华,等.北京土壤流失方程[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
    [16] 包玉斌,黄涛,吕林涛.陕北黄土高原实施退耕还林还草工程后的土壤保持效应[J].宁夏大学学报(自然科学版),2021,42(3):1-8.
    [17] 中华人民共和国生态环境部.生态保护红线监管技术规范生态功能评价(试行)[R].北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部,2020.
    [18] 刘宥延,刘兴元,张博,等.黄土高原丘陵区人工灌草生态系统水土保持功能评估[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):84-90,97.
    [19] 国家林业和草原局.中国退耕还林还草二十年(1999—2019)[R].北京:国家林业和草原局,2020.
    [20] 匡文慧,张树文,杜国明,等.2015—2020年中国土地利用变化遥感制图及时空特征分析[J].地理学报,2022,77(5):1056-1071.
    [21] 谢怡凡,姚顺波,丁振民,等.退耕还林和地理特征对土壤侵蚀的关联影响:以陕西省107个县区为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(1):301-312.
    [22] Ding Zhenmin, Yao Shunbo. Ecological effectiveness of payment for ecosystem services to identify incentive priority areas: sloping land conversion program in China [J]. Land Use Policy, 2021,104:105350.
    [23] Qian Chen, Shao Liqun, Hou Xianhui, et al. Detection and attribution of vegetation greening trend across distinct local landscapes under China’s grain to green program: a case study in Shaanxi Province [J]. Catena, 2019,183:104182.
    [24] 李军,王学春,邵明安,等.黄土高原半干旱和半湿润地区刺槐林地生物量与土壤干燥化效应的模拟[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(3):330-339.
    [25] 吴兆喆.科学精准评估退耕还林还草工程生态效益[N].中国绿色时报,2022-07-01.
    [26] 吴普侠,汪晓珍,吴建召,等.中国退耕还林工程固碳现状及固碳潜力估算[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(4):342-349.
    [27] 李世东.世界著名生态工程:中国“退耕还林还草工程”[J].浙江林业,2021(8):9-11.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

孙旭伟,姜泳波,王乃亮,王亚晖,赵鸿雁.渭河源区坡耕地时空变化及其土壤保持效应[J].水土保持通报英文版,2023,43(4):405-412

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:476
  • PDF: 778
  • HTML: 662
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:August 22,2022
  • Revised:November 19,2022
  • Online: September 27,2023