Research Progress and Prospect of Slope Greening in China—Bibliometric Analysis Based on CiteSpace and VOSviewer
Author:
Clc Number:

U417.12,G252.7

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [48]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The current status and hot trends of slope greening research were studied in order to provide theoretical support and references for subsequent research. [Methods] Professional bibliometric tools CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to visualize and analyze slope greening research literature indexed by the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database. The main indicators included publication volume, high-frequency keywords, keyword co-occurrence clusters, and burst keywords. The research hotspots and changes in research trends were discussed from three aspects:mechanisms of slope root fixation of soil, selection and configuration of slope plants, and application of engineering greening technology. [Results] There has been a good trend of publishing scientific research results in the field of slope greening in China. Research institutions were mostly higher education institutions (colleges and universities) with programs in the fields of agriculture, forestry, science, and engineering. As a multidisciplinary and comprehensive application technology, slope greening has a very necessary role to play in industry associations. [Conclusion] At present, the variation pattern of slope stability is an important research direction. Numerical simulation technology is expected to play a greater role in the study of slope stability. Plant screening research has focused on the ecological adaptability of plants, which can strengthen future investigations and breeding efforts related to plants adapted to slope protection in the region. Determining the factors influencing plant diversity changes can contribute to the sustainability of plant configuration. Spraying was found to be the most widely used greening technology. The topics of erosion resistance and stability of substrate materials were research hotspots. In the future, it will be necessary to start with the standardization of terminology, construction methods, equipment, and materials so as to gradually establish a standard system for spraying and greening technology applicable to conditions found in China.

    Reference
    [1] 仓田益二郎.绿化工程技术[M]//顾宝衡,译.四川:四川科学技术出版社,1989.
    [2] 刘瑛,高甲荣.土壤生物工程技术在河流生态修复中的应用[M]//北京:中国林业出版社,2012:34-35.
    [3] Stokes A, Sotir R, Chen W, et al.Soil bio-and eco-engineering in China:past experience and future priorities [J].Ecological Engineering, 2010,36(3):247-257.
    [4] Norris J E, Stokes A, Mickovski S B, et al.Slope Stability and Erosion Control:ecotechnological solutions [M].Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
    [5] 赵廷宁,辜再元,丁国栋,等.国内边坡绿化现状与发展[C]//中国水土保持学会.发展水土保持科技、实现人与自然和谐:中国水土保持学会第三次全国会员代表大会学术论文集.中国农业科学技术出版社,2006.
    [6] 郭小平,朱金兆,周心澄,等.植被护坡技术及其应用[J].中国水土保持科学,2004(4):112-116.
    [7] 郭小平,赵廷宁,王玮璐,等."工程绿化学术动态"课程教学改革探讨[J].中国林业教育,2011,29(2):65-67.
    [8] 顾卫,崔维佳,许映军,等.工程创面生态恢复产业化问题初探[J].水利水电科技进展,2008,28(6):66-70.
    [9] 王晓宁.工程绿化图形信息管理系统的开发与应用[D].北京:北京林业大学,2009.
    [10] 李杰,魏瑞斌.VOSviewer应用现状及其知识基础研究[J].农业图书情报学报,2022,34(6):61-71.
    [11] 陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,等.CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253.
    [12] 邱均平.文献计量学[M].2版.北京:科学出版社,2019,38-41.
    [13] 李杰,陈超美.CiteSpace:科技文本挖掘及可视化[M].2版.北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2017.
    [14] 李国荣,胡夏嵩,毛小青,等.青藏高原东北部黄土区灌木植物根系护坡效应的数值模拟[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(9):1877-1884.
    [15] 田佳,及金楠,钟琦,等.贺兰山云杉林根土复合体提高边坡稳定性分析[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(20):144-152.
    [16] 毛正君,耿咪咪,毕银丽,等.紫花苜蓿-黄土复合体抗剪强度时间效应研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2023,51(11):234-247.
    [17] 张晓航,杨建英,赵惠恩,等.公路边坡喷播绿化初期根系特征及其对抗剪强度的影响[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(5):1528-1537.
    [18] 刘治兴,杨建英,杨阳,等.高速公路不同植物防护边坡根土复合体抗剪能力研究[J].生态环境学报,2015,24(4):631-637.
    [19] 张超波,蒋静,陈丽华.植物根系固土力学机制模型[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(31):1-6.
    [20] 付江涛,李光莹,虎啸天,等.植物固土护坡效应的研究现状及发展趋势[J].工程地质学报,2014,22(6):1135-1146.
    [21] 张家明,陈积普,杨继清,等.中国岩质边坡植被护坡技术研究进展[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):1-7.
    [22] 夏冬,李富平,袁雪涛,等.露天矿岩质边坡生态重建技术研究现状及发展趋势[J].金属矿山,2018(1):1-10.
    [23] 赵廷宁,张玉秀,曹兵,等.西北干旱荒漠区煤炭基地生态安全保障技术[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):1-5.
    [24] 刘若莎,王冬梅,李平,等.青海高寒区典型人工林植物多样性、地上生物量特征及其相关性[J].生态学报,2020,40(2):692-700.
    [25] 韩煜,赵廷宁,陈琳,等.坡面植被恢复试验示范区植被群落特征初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(4):188-194.
    [26] 刘尧尧,辜彬,王丽.北川震后植被恢复工程植物群落物种多样性及优势种生态位[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(2):309-320.
    [27] 乔欧盟,陈璋.矿区不同类型生态护坡工程植物多样性对环境因子的响应[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(3):742-8.
    [28] 张琳,陆兆华,唐思易,等.露天煤矿排土场边坡植被组成特征及其群落稳定性评价[J].生态学报,2021,41(14):5764-5774.
    [29] 方月,魏强,赵健,等.成兰铁路干旱河谷段边坡创面不同恢复阶段的植物多样性[J].应用与环境生物学报,2022,28(5):1137-43.
    [30] 潘声旺,胡明成,罗竞红,等.绿化植物的生活型对边坡植被物种多样性及护坡性能的影响[J].生物多样性,2015,23(3):341-350.
    [31] 罗胜南.重庆4种乡土植物环境适应特征研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2021.
    [32] 杨汉宏,张勇,郑海峰,等.不同人工植物配置对排土场边坡水土流失的影响[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(4):6-11.
    [33] 刘洋,侯占山,赵爽,等.太行山片麻岩山区造地边坡植被恢复过程中植物多样性与土壤特性的演变[J].生态学报,2018,38(15):5331-5339.
    [34] 刘涛,程金花,李宏钧,等.伊犁地区公路边坡植被恢复措施与土壤因子的耦合关系[J].公路交通科技,2021,38(4):28-35.
    [35] 韩颖,刘勇,乔欧盟,等.矿区岩质边坡人工土壤-植被特性研究[J].山西大学学报(自然科学版),2023,46(3):733-742.
    [36] 孔东莲,郭小平,赵廷宁.植被护坡技术的研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(1):69-71.
    [37] 国家林业和草原局.GB/T 38360-2019裸露坡面植被恢复技术规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2019.
    [38] 王赵明,奚成刚,王亮.城镇污水处理厂污泥堆肥对喷播基质物理性质的影响[J].环境工程,2016,34(S1):205-209.
    [39] 苗杰,曲炳鹏,王淑琦,等.护坡绿化基质不同配比对植物生长影响的盆栽试验研究[J].中国水土保持,2022(12):46-51.
    [40] 刘冠宏,张森,郭小平,等.绿化废弃物堆肥配制喷播基质的试验研究[J].环境科学与技术,2018,41(5):61-66.
    [41] 邓川,郭晶晶,郭小平,等.工程渣土配制喷播基质的配方筛选研究[J].土壤通报,2016,47(4):959-965.
    [42] 单永体,胡林,王琦,等.径流冲刷对高寒高海拔地区高等级公路边坡侵蚀的影响[J].交通运输工程学报,2016,16(4):88-95.
    [43] 陶玥琛.客土喷播防护路堑边坡的植被恢复与坡面侵蚀特征研究[D].广东广州:华南理工大学,2021.
    [44] 陈兵,付金生,倪安辰,等.青藏公路边坡不同生态防护措施的水土流失防治效果研究[J].公路交通科技,2020,37(S2):11-17.
    [45] 张红日,王桂尧,沙琳川.一种稻秸杆泥皮护坡材料及抗冲刷试验研究[J].公路交通科技,2017,34(1):24-31.
    [46] 喻永祥,郝社锋,蒋波,等.基于聚氨酯复合基材的岩质边坡客土生态修复试验研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2021,48(2):174-181.
    [47] 赵平.喷播技术设备的类型与性能比较[J].公路,2005(1):200-206.
    [48] 简尊吉,郭泉水,马凡强,等.生态袋护坡技术在三峡水库消落带植被恢复中应用的可行性研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(21):7941-7951.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

张梦岩,郭小平,赵廷宁,冀晓东,魏天兴,史常青.中国边坡绿化研究进展与展望——基于CiteSpace和VOSviewer的文献计量分析[J].水土保持通报英文版,2023,43(6):248-255

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:251
  • PDF: 1237
  • HTML: 825
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:August 27,2023
  • Revised:October 13,2023
  • Online: January 29,2024