Analysis of Soil Strengthening and Slope Protection Effect of two kinds of Herbaceous Plants on Red Clay Slope
Author:
Affiliation:

Guizhou Institute of Water Resources Science

Clc Number:

S157.2;TU42? ??

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [28]
  • | |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] A large number of red clay slopes exist in Guizhou Province, and soil erosion and shallow landslides are prominent problems. The use of herbaceous plants to protect red clay slopes is of great significance for shallow landslide management and soil and water conservation in Guizhou Province, but there are fewer related studies. [Methods] With red clay slope as the research object, Cynodon dactylon and Vetiver grass were selected as slope protection plants. The slope protection effect of the two herbaceous plants was investigated through planting test, root tensile test, straight shear test, and indoor simulated scouring test. [Results] ① Within 150 days of planting, both herbaceous plants grew steadily and the tensile strength of the root system continued to increase. From 30 to 150 days of growth, the maximum tensile strength of Cynodon dactylon increased from 0.84N to 8.59N, and that of Vetiver grass increased from 4.78N to 89.89N. ② Comparing the rootless soil at 120 days of growth, the cohesion of Cynodon dactylon root-soil complex increased by 91.1% and the angle of internal friction by 12.45%; the cohesion of Vetiver grass root-soil complex increased by 107.47% and the angle of internal friction by 12.74%. ③ Comparing the bare slope at 150 days of growth, the runoff rate of Cynodon dactylon slope decreased by 45.02% to 54.15%, the sediment yield rate decreased by 58.3% to 93.85%, and the 60-min cumulative sediment yield decreased by 81.02%; the runoff rate of Vetiver grass slope decreased by 35.46% to 46.48%, the sediment yield decreased rate by 46.8% to 89.44%, and the 60-min cumulative sediment yield decreased by 74.61%. [Conclusion] Both herbaceous plants have excellent soil consolidation and slope protection effects on red clay slopes, with Vetiver grass having a more pronounced effect on the increase in soil shear strength, and Cynodon dactylon having a more significant effect on soil and water conservation.

    Reference
    [1] 刘黎明, 邱卫民, 许文年, 等. 传统护坡与生态护坡比较与分析[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 29(06): 528-532.
    [2] 汪洋, 周明耀, 赵瑞龙, 等. 城镇河道生态护坡技术的研究现状与展望[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2005, 3(01): 88-92.
    [3] Yang Y, Yang J Y, Zhao T N, et al. Ecological restoration of highway sl-ope by covering with straw-mat and seeding with grass–legume mixture[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 90: 68-76.
    [4] 胡炜, 刘宇峰, 秦卫星.考虑植被护坡的河道生态岸坡稳定性分析[J/OL]. 长江科学院院报: 1-6[2023-06-20]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1171.TV.20210510.1123.004.html.
    [5] 范昕然, 王海琳. 植物型生态护坡在河道治理中的应用[J]. 水运工程, 2023(S2): 15-19.
    [6] 付江涛, 李光莹, 虎啸天, 等. 植物固土护坡效应的研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 工程地质学报, 2014, 22(06): 1135-1146.
    [7] 周云艳. 植物根系固土机理与护坡技术研究[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2010.
    [8] 潘天辉, 杜峰, 王月. 陕北黄土区护坡植物根系分布和抗剪增强分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(03): 357-363+371.
    [9] 窦增宁, 胡夏嵩, 刘昌义, 等. 模拟降雨条件下黄土区边坡植物护坡效应[J]. 人民黄河, 2018, 40(03): 83-87.
    [10] Liu Y B, Hu X S, Yu D M, et al. Influence of the roots of mixed-planti-ng species on the shear strength of saline loess soil[J]. Journal of Mounta-in Science, 2021, 18(2): 806-818.
    [11] 徐榴胜. 红粘土在贵州水利工程中的应用[J]. 贵州地质, 1991, 8(02): 163-173.
    [12] 廖义玲, 朱立军. 贵州碳酸盐岩红土[M]. 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 2004: 132-135.
    [13] 段晓明, 苗增健, 刘连新, 等. 生态护坡应用及护坡植物群落的选择[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(31): 15327-15329+15339.
    [14] 马安卫, 陈淑烨, 蔡峰. 浅析河道护坡植物选择与河道养护关联性[J]. 人民长江, 2011, 42(04): 20-22.
    [15] 王轩, 李珍玉, 肖宏彬, 等. 基于土-水特征曲线的植物边坡抗剪强度研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(05): 57-62+71.
    [16] 崔远远, 张征云, 刘鹏, 等. 镉与聚乙烯微塑料胁迫对小白菜根系的形态特征和分形维数的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(01): 158-165.
    [17] 潘天辉, 杜峰, 王月. 陕北黄土区护坡植物根系分布和抗剪增强分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(03): 357-363+371.
    [18] Stokes A, Atger C, Bengough A G, et al. Desirable plant root traits for protecting natural and engineered slopes against landslides[J]. Plant Soil, 2009, 324(1-2): 1-30.
    [19] 黄洋, 陈筠, 黄阳, 等. 草本植物在贵阳红黏土的形态分布与力学性能研究[J]. 中国水运(下半月), 2022, 22(01): 45-47.
    [20] 任树梅, 刘洪禄, 顾涛. 人工模拟降雨技术研究综述[J]. 中国农村水利水电,2003, (03): 73-75.
    [21] 张东海, 段莹, 周文钰, 等. 贵阳市暴雨强度公式推求[J]. 城市道桥与防洪, 2016, (01): 95-99+11-12.
    [22] 王文生, 杨晓华, 谢永利. 公路边坡植物的护坡机理[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 25(04): 26-30.
    [23] 郑启萍, 徐得潜. 草本植物护坡机理及其固土效应试验研究[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 37(02): 225-228.
    [24] 张兴玲, 胡夏嵩. 青藏高原东北部黄土区草本植物根系加筋土的抗剪特性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(04): 185-188.
    [25] 程洪, 谢涛, 唐春, 等. 植物根系力学与固土作用机理研究综述[J]. 水土保持通报, 2006, 26(01): 97-102.
    [26] Morel J L, Habib L, Plantureux S, et al. Influence of maize root mucilage on soil aggregate stability[J]. Plant Soil, 1991, 136(1): 111-119.
    [27] Wang Y G, Liu X X. Plant Slope Protection in Highway Engineering[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, 170(5).
    [28] 刘均阳, 周正朝, 苏雪萌. 植物根系对土壤团聚体形成作用机制研究回顾[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(03): 267-273+298.
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:147
  • PDF: 359
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:June 21,2023
  • Revised:October 02,2023
  • Adopted:October 05,2023
  • Online: March 01,2024