Spatiotemporal Evolution and Coupling Coordination of Socio-economic Level and Ecological Resilience in Fuzhou Metropolitan Area
Author:
Clc Number:

X24,F224

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [28]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The coordinated state of socio-economic level (SEL) and ecological resilience (ER) in the Fuzhou metropolitan area (FMA) and its development trend were analyzed in order to provide regulatory suggestions and theoretical references for high-quality and sustainable development of this metropolitan area. [Methods] Data were obtained for 27 county cities in FMA, and a three-dimensional ecological resilience evaluation model based on the "resistance-recovery-adaptability" characteristics of resilience was constructed. A universal social and economic level evaluation index system was also constructed. The entropy weight method, coupling coordination degree model, kernel density model, scissors difference method, and gravity center migration model were used to determine the temporal and spatial evolution trends of SEL, ER, and coupling and coordination level of FMA. The main factors affecting the coordinated development were determined by Pearson correlation analysis. [Results] ① The mean value of SEL for FMA increased from 0.181 2 to 0.320 8. The spatially high SEL areas were distributed as "one core and three centers" with FMA as the core. ② The mean value of ecological environmental resistance (ER) decreased from 0.429 4 to 0.349 4, and the high ER areas were mainly concentrated in the inland mountainous areas such as "Yanping-Gutian", while the low ER areas were located in the coastal area of "Mawei-Meizhou Island", and formed a resilience "depression" in and around FMA. ER and its subsystems exhibited strong positive autocorrelation in space. ③ The mean value of coupling coordination degree steadily increased from 0.51 to 0.56. The speed of development in terms of the SEL and ER of counties tended to be balanced, and the scissor angle difference generally decreased. The center of gravity of coordinated development moved to the central part of FMA, and the number of counties entering a type of coordinated development increased significantly. The main factors hindering the coupled coordination were the risk resistance index, per capita GDP, and the number of hospital beds per thousand people. [Conclusion] The SEL and ER of FMA showed a trend of "misaligned" development in space-time, and the coupling and coordination level of both still has much room for improvement.

    Reference
    [1] 刘士林.文化城市群与中原经济区的跨越式发展[J].河南社会科学,2013,21(12):7-11.
    [2] 王庚,查轩,黄少燕,等.福建省永定县的水土流失动态变化[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(6):272-277.
    [3] 王少剑,崔子恬,林靖杰,等.珠三角地区城镇化与生态韧性的耦合协调研究[J].地理学报,2021,76(4):973-991.
    [4] Holling C S.Resilience and stability of ecological systems [J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973,4(4):1-23.
    [5] 石龙宇,郑巧雅,杨萌,等.城市韧性概念、影响因素及其评估研究进展[J].生态学报,2022,42(14):6016-6029.
    [6] 陈长坤,陈以琴,施波,等.雨洪灾害情境下城市韧性评估模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2018,28(4):1-6.
    [7] 李苏,刘浩南.干旱区城市化与生态韧性耦合协调的时空格局演化分析:以宁夏为例[J].干旱区地理,2022,45(4):1281-1290.
    [8] 肖圣,多玲花,邹自力.基于"风险-连通性-潜力" 的南昌市生态韧性评估[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(3):733-741.
    [9] 陶洁怡,董平,陆玉麒.长三角地区生态韧性时空变化及影响因素分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(9):1975-1987.
    [10] 王松茂,牛金兰.山东半岛城市群城市生态韧性的动态演化及障碍因子分析[J].经济地理,2022,42(8):51-61.
    [11] 修春亮,魏冶,王绮.基于"规模-密度-形态"的大连市城市韧性评估[J].地理学报,2018,73(12):2315-2328.
    [12] 蒋文鑫,吴军,徐建刚.城市生态韧性与经济发展水平耦合协调关系研究:以江苏省为例[J].资源开发与市场,2023,39(3):299-308,318.
    [13] Zhang Xiao, Liu Liangyun, Chen Xidong, et al.GLC_FCS30:global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series Landsat imagery [J].Earth System Science Data, 2021,13(6):2753-2776.
    [14] 方东平,李在上,李楠,等.城市韧性:基于"三度空间下系统的系统"的思考[J].土木工程学报,2017,50(7):1-7.
    [15] 陈全通,殷浩然,李艳红,等.秦巴山地景观生态风险的时空分异[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(3):239-246.
    [16] 陈集景,周蕾,迟永刚.陆地生态系统稳定性空间格局及影响机制研究综述[J].中国农业气象,2021,42(7):552-560.
    [17] 高玉琴,刘云苹,闫光辉,等.秦淮河流域水系结构及连通度变化分析[J].水利水电科技进展,2020,40(5):32-39.
    [18] 许凤娇,吕晓.基于土地利用变化的江苏沿海地区生态风险格局[J].生态学报,2018,38(20):7312-7325.
    [19] 王云才.上海市城市景观生态网络连接度评价[J].地理研究,2009,28(2):284-292.
    [20] 朱诗洁,毛劲乔,戴会超.资料缺乏地区水系连通工程效益评价方法研究[J].水力发电学报,2021,40(2):12-19.
    [21] 邵丽亚,陈荣蓉,侯俊国,等.城镇建设用地生态适宜性评价研究:以重庆市荣昌县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2013,34(6):86-92.
    [22] 杨璐迪,曾晨,焦利民,等.基于生态足迹的武汉城市圈生态承载力评价和生态补偿研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(9):1332-1341.
    [23] 邱寿丰,朱远.基于国家生态足迹账户计算方法的福建省生态足迹研究[J].生态学报,2012,32(22):7124-7134.
    [24] 张中浩,聂甜甜,高阳,等.长江经济带生态系统服务与经济社会发展耦合协调关联时空特征研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(5):1086-1100.
    [25] 许玉洁,刘曙光.黄河流域绿色创新效率空间格局演化及其影响因素[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(3):627-644.
    [26] 姜悦,侯现慧,刘国彬,等.黄土高原生态-经济-社会耦合协调发展研究:以长武县、绥德县、神木市和淳化县为例[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(4):234-243.
    [27] 王宇琦,沈润平,黄安奇,等.2001-2017年中国不同耕作区重建MODIS LAI时空动态[J].地球信息科学学报,2021,23(4):658-669.
    [28] Yangfan Li, Yi Li, Yan Zhou, et al.Investigation of a coupling model of coordination between urbanization and the environment [J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2012,98:127-133.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

李诗涵,陈秋霞,许章华,俞辉,朱嘉豪,刘智才,王琳.福州都市圈社会经济水平与生态环境韧性的时空演化及耦合协调性[J].水土保持通报英文版,2023,43(6):311-323

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:February 23,2023
  • Revised:May 18,2023
  • Online: January 29,2024