Factors Influencing Recessive Transformation of Land Use in Fujian Province During 2000-2020
Author:
Clc Number:

F301.24

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [31]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The spatio-temporal characteristics of the dominant driving forces and influencing factors of county land use transition in Fujian Province were analyzed, and a logical analysis framework of influencing factors of land use transition was constructed, in order to provide a reference for the high-quality development of land use in Fujian Province. [Methods] Based on land use data and socio-economic data for Fujian Province in 2000, 2010, and 2020, we constructed a logical analytical framework of the factors influencing land use transformation by using a theoretical analysis method, a land use transfer matrix, a comprehensive index method, and geographically weighted regression. Based on these methods, we conducted a systematic analysis on the dominant driving force of land use transformation, the shift of land classes, the spatial and temporal characteristics of implicit land use patterns, and the influencing factors in Fujian Province. [Results] ① Regions of Fujian Province showed a development trend with economic-ecological security as the main driving force; ② The area of construction land in Fujian Province increased by 2 897.45 km2 during 2000-2020, being mainly converted from arable land, followed by forest land and grassland; ③ Land use recessive morphology in Fujian Province showed a "strip-like" spatial characteristic, forming the Fuzhou-Putian-Xiamen high-level zone and the Fuding-Minhou-Xianyou-Anxi-Zhaoan and Wuyishan-Nanping-Sanming-Longyan intermediate morphology zones; ④ Traffic density and urbanization were the main factors influencing land use transformation in Fujian Province. [Conclusion] Fujian Province should strengthen transportation construction between inland and coastal areas, and between remote and urban areas. Fujian Province should also implement a new urbanization strategy, and at the same time further promote mountain-sea cooperation in the new era, and give full play to the leading role of coastal cities such as Fuzhou City and Xiamen City.

    Reference
    [1] 李平,李秀彬,刘学军.我国现阶段土地利用变化驱动力的宏观分析[J].地理研究,2001,20(2):129-138.
    [2] 龙花楼.土地利用转型的解释[J].中国土地科学,2022,36(4):1-7.
    [3] 龙花楼.论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(2):131-138.
    [4] 龙花楼,李秀彬.区域土地利用转型分析:以长江沿线样带为例[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(2):144-149.
    [5] 李灿.区域土地利用转型诊断与调控的分析路径[J].地理研究,2021,40(5):1464-1477.
    [6] 王兆林,刘福兵,杨庆媛,等.山区农村居民点时空格局演变特征及蚁群仿真优化:以重庆澄江镇为例[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(8):2065-2084.
    [7] 张文慧.黄河三角洲土地利用转型时空格局及其驱动机制研究[D].山东曲阜:曲阜师范大学,2021.
    [8] 宋家鹏.土地利用转型背景下的生态系统服务格局与过程研究[D].福建福州:福建师范大学,2021.
    [9] 王婷,韦仕川.2009-2018年海口市土地利用转型特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(1):344-352.
    [10] 张文斌,张志斌,董建红,等.多尺度视角下耕地利用功能转型及驱动力分析:以甘肃省为例[J].地理科学,2021,41(5):900-910.
    [11] 马丽君,程久苗,程建,等.土地利用隐性转型影响因素分析[J].中国土地科学,2019,33(7):81-90.
    [12] 黄珺嫦,华轩轲,贾梦瑶,等.2000-2020年河南省耕地利用显性转型时空特征[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(1):206-213.
    [13] Zhang Ping, Liu Lei, Yang Lianwei, et al.Exploring the response of ecosystem service value to land use changes under multiple scenarios coupling a mixed-cell cellular automata model and system dynamics model in Xi'an, China [J].Ecological Indicators, 2023,147:110009.
    [14] Xiao Yu, Huang Mengdong, Xie Gaodi, et al.Evaluating the impacts of land use change on ecosystem service values under multiple scenarios in the Hunshandake region of China [J].Science of the Total Environment, 2022,850:158067.
    [15] 邓楚雄,彭勇,李科,等.基于生产-生态-生活空间多情景模拟下的流域土地利用转型及生态环境效应[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(8):2506-2516.
    [16] 谭林,陈岚.乡村空间重构与土地利用转型耦合机制及路径分析[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(7):1829-1847.
    [17] 王昊煜,高培超,宋长青,等.基于遗传算法的土地利用优化研究进展:文献计量分析[J].生态学报,2023,43(3):1-9.
    [18] Gao Lina, Tao Fei, Liu Runrui, et al.Multi-scenario simulation and ecological risk analysis of land use based on the PLUS model:a case study of Nanjing [J].Sustainable Cities and Society, 2022,85:104055.
    [19] Long H.Theorizing land use transitions:a human geography perspective [J].Habitat International, 2022,128:102669.
    [20] 刘彦随,龙花楼,李裕瑞.全球乡城关系新认知与人文地理学研究[J].地理学报,2021,76(12):2869-2884.
    [21] 宋小青.论土地利用转型的研究框架[J].地理学报,2017,72(3):471-487.
    [22] 张玥,代亚强,陈媛媛,等.土地利用隐性转型与土地利用碳排放空间关联研究[J].中国土地科学,2022,36(6):100-112.
    [23] 宋家鹏,陈松林.福建省土地利用隐性形态与土地生态安全耦合协调分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(4):301-307.
    [24] 龙花楼.国内土地利用转型研究的前沿探索[C]//中国自然资源学会土地资源研究专业委员会,中国地理学会农业地理与乡村发展专业委员会,中国城乡发展智库联盟,中国新时期土地资源科学与新常态创新发展战略研讨会暨中国自然资源学会土地资源研究专业委员会30周年纪念会论文集.辽宁沈阳:东北大学出版社,2016:27-38.
    [25] 程建,程久苗.中国省际土地利用隐性形态时空格局、驱动力与转型模式[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(12):60-68,97.
    [26] 卢宾宾,葛咏,秦昆,等.地理加权回归分析技术综述[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2020,45(9):1356-1366.
    [27] 龙花楼,李秀彬.长江沿线样带土地利用格局及其影响因子分析[J].地理学报,2001,56(4):417-425.
    [28] 陈龙,周生路,周兵兵,等.基于主导功能的江苏省土地利用转型特征与驱动力[J].经济地理,2015,35(2):155-162.
    [29] 刘永强,龙花楼.黄淮海平原农区土地利用转型及其动力机制[J].地理学报,2016,71(4):666-679.
    [30] 姜楠,贾宝全,宋宜昊.基于Logistic回归模型的北京市耕地变化驱动力分析[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(6):1402-1409.
    [31] 龙花楼.论土地利用转型与土地资源管理[J].地理研究,2015,34(9):1607-1618.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

蒲佳豪,陈松林,杜峯屹.2000—2020年福建省土地利用隐性转型的影响因素[J].水土保持通报英文版,2023,43(6):402-411

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:134
  • PDF: 487
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:June 01,2023
  • Revised:September 25,2023
  • Online: January 29,2024