+Advanced Search
Home > Archive>Volume 44, Issue 1, 2024 >9-19. DOI:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.01.002
PDF HTML XML Export Cite reminder
Effects of Different Band Spacings of Riparian Sand-fixation Forest Belts on Soil Moisture and Vegetation Community Characteristics in Riverbank Sandy Areas
Author:
Clc Number:

S775

  • Article
    • | |
  • Metrics
    • |
  • Reference [35]
    • |
  • Related
    • |
  • Cited by
    • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] The coastal area of the Yellow River is one of the areas experiencing the most severe soil and water loss. The soil moisture and vegetation community characteristics of riparian-sand-fixing forest belt in sandy areas were studied under different zone spacing, and the belt spacing under the optimal allocation mode was determined in order to provide the basis for the construction of row and belt afforestation of riparian sand-fixing forest belt in sandy areas.[Methods] The study was conducted on sand-fixation forest belts with different band spacings at Xiliugou, Dalat Banner, Ordos City, Inner Mongolia. Soil sampling and vegetation surveys were carried out in the sand-fixation forest sample plots with different band spacings of 8 m, 16 m, 22 m, and 28 m. Soil physical properties and vegetation community characteristics were analyzed. The correlation between soil moisture and vegetation was also determined.[Results] ① The soil moisture and vegetation index of different sand-fixation forest belts increased with increasing band spacing. ② The soil moisture for different soil layers in the 0-100 cm soil layer in various zones of the band spacing also increased with the increasing horizontal spacing, and the change tended to be stable after 11 m. ③ Soil moisture in different zones was positively correlated with vegetation index in general, but the evenness index and richness index were different. The greater the band spacing, the better the vegetation restoration effect, and the peak value of the restoration effect was approximately reached when the band spacing was 22 m.[Conclusion] The vegetation restoration effect increased with increasing sand-fixation forest belt band spacing when sandy land was treated with a low coverage row-type sand-fixation forest, but it is not always that the wider the band spacing, the better the vegetation restoration effect. The 22 m band spacing had the best vegetation restoration effect of all of the row-type sand-fixation forest band spacings, and the near-natural restoration effect on sandy land was the best.

    Reference
    [1] 张云芝,胡云锋,韩月琪,等.全球主要生态退化区和研究热点区的空间分布与演变[J].生态学报,2021,41(19):7599-7613. Zhang Yunzhi, Hu Yunfeng, Han Yueqi, et al. Spatial distributions and evolutions of global major ecological degradation regions and research hotspot regions[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(19):7599-7613.
    [2] Wei Yunjie, Zhen Lin, Du Bingzhen. The evolution of desertification control and restoration technology in typical ecologically vulnerable regions[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2022,13(5):775-785.
    [3] Liang Yuting, Hu Yunfeng, Han Yueqi. Spatial distribution and dynamic changes in research hotspots for desertification in China based on big data from CNKI[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019,10(6):692.
    [4] 杨文斌,李卫,党宏忠.低覆盖度治沙:原理、模式与效果[M].北京:科学出版社,2016. Yang Wenbin, Li Wei, Dang Hongzhong. Low coverage desertification control:principle, model and effect[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2016.
    [5] 杨文斌,王涛,冯伟,等.低覆盖度治沙的理论与沙漠科技进步[J].中国沙漠,2017,37(1):1-6. Yang Wenbin, Wang Tao, Feng Wei, et al. The theory and progress of sand control with low coverage[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2017,37(1):1-6.
    [6] Qiu Dexun, Xu Ruirui, Wu Changxue, et al. Vegetation restoration improves soil hydrological properties by regulating soil physicochemical properties in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022,609:127730.
    [7] 代林利,周丽丽,伍丽,华,等.不同林分密度杉木林生态系统碳密度及其垂直空间分配特征[J].生态学报,2022,42(2):710-719. Dai Linli, Zhou Lili, Wu Lihua, et al. Carbon density and vertical spatial distribution characteristics of Cunninghamia lanceolata forest ecosystem with different stand density[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(2):710-719.
    [8] 杨文斌,王涛,熊伟,等.低覆盖度治沙理论的核心水文原理概述[J].中国沙漠,2021,41(03):75-80. Yang Wenbin, Wang Tao, Xiong Wei, et al. Overview of the core hydrological principle of low coverage desertification control theory[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2019,41(03):75-80.
    [9] 何晓帆,田丽慧,汪海娇,等.高寒沙地沙棘群落的土壤水分时空变异特征[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(2):23-33. He Xiaofan, Tian Lihui, Wang Haijiao, et al. Temporal-spatial variation of soil moisture content of different Hippophae rhamnoides communities in an alpine desert[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,43(2):23-33.
    [10] 冯伟,李卫,杨文斌,等.毛乌素沙地樟子松固沙林土壤水分对降雨的动态响应[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):101-107. Feng Wei, Li Wei, Yang Wenbin, et al. Dynamic response of soil moisture to rainfall in the Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica sand fixation forest of mu us sandy land[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,26(3):101-107.
    [11] 姜丽娜,杨文斌,卢琦,等.低覆盖度行带式固沙林对土壤及植被的修复效应[J].生态学报,2013,33(10):3192-3204. Jiang Lina, Yang Wenbin, Lu Qi, et al. The effect of low-covered sand-fixing forest belts on restoration of the soil and vegetation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(10):3192-3204.
    [12] Wang Zhao, Zhang Tinglong, Pei Chenyang, et al. Multisource remote sensing monitoring and analysis of the driving forces of vegetation restoration in the mu us sandy land[J]. Land, 2022,11(9):1553.
    [13] 封扬帆,李鹏,张祎,等.西柳沟流域拦沙坝沟道冲刷减蚀能力模拟[J].水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):24-31. Feng Yangfan, Li Peng, Zhang Yi, et al. Simulation on the gully erosion reduction ability of check dam in Xiliugou basin[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,36(5):24-31.
    [14] 王普庆,侯素珍.西柳沟丘陵区土壤组成及对流域产沙的影响[J].人民黄河,2020,42(2):1-4. Wang Puqing, Hou Suzhen. Influence of different grain sizes of soil composition of Xiliugou gullied rolling loess area to the sediment yield of watershed[J]. Yellow River, 2020,42(2):1-4.
    [15] 姜丽娜.低覆盖度行带式固沙林促进带间土壤、植被修复效应的研究[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2011. Jiang Lina. Study on the effect of low coverage belt sand-fixing forest on promoting interzone soil and vegetation restoration[D]. Hohhot, Inner Mongolia:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2011.
    [16] 付永硕,张晶,吴兆飞,等.中国植被物候研究进展及展望[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2022,58(3):424-433. Fu Yongshuo, Zhang Jing, Wu Zhaofei, et al. Vegetation phenology response to climate change in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 2022,58(3):424-433.
    [17] Kassa G, Bekele T, Demissew S, et al. Plant species diversity, plant use, and classification of agroforestry homegardens in Southern and Southwestern Ethiopia[J]. Heliyon, 2023,9(6):e16341.
    [18] 姜丽娜,杨文斌,姚云峰,等.不同配置的行带式杨树固沙林与带间植被修复的关系[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(2):88-92. Jiang Lina, Yang Wenbin, Yao Yunfeng, et al. Relationship between sand-fixing forest of Populus under different belts distribution pattern and their undergrowth vegetation recovery[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011,9(2):88-92.
    [19] Feng Yuanyuan, Wang Shihang, Zhao Mingsong, et al. Monitoring of land desertification changes in Urat Front Banner from 2010 to 2020 based on remote sensing data[J]. Water, 2022,14(11):1777.
    [20] 吴雪琼,杨文斌,李卫,等.低覆盖度行带式种植模式下赤峰杨根系分布特征[J].林业科学研究,2015,28(2):255-260. Wu Xueqiong, Yang Wenbin, Li Wei, et al. Root distribution of Populus×xiaozhuanica cv.'chifengensis'planted under low coverage belt-scheme[J]. Forest Research, 2015,28(2):255-260.
    [21] 郭艳菊,马晓静,许爱云,等.宁夏东部风沙区沙化草地土壤水分和植被的空间特征[J].生态学报,2022,42(4):1571-1581. Guo Yanju, Ma Xiaojing, Xu Aiyun, et al. Spatial characteristics of soil moisture and vegetation in desertification grassland in Eastern Ningxia sand-wind area, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(4):1571-1581.
    [22] 赵鑫,辛一凡,张应龙,等.不同植被类型对毛乌素沙地背风坡土壤水分时空变化的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2021,36(3):36-43. Zhao Xin, Xin Yifan, Zhang Yinglong, et al. Effects of different vegetation types on temporal and spatial variation of soil moisture on leeward slope of Mu Us sandy land[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2021,36(3):36-43.
    [23] 李卫,冯伟,杨文斌,等.低覆盖度行带式固沙林带间土壤水分动态特征[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):163-167. Li Wei, Feng Wei, Yang Wenbin, et al. Soil moisture dynamic characteristics of low coverage sand-fixing forest belts[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015,29(2):163-167.
    [24] 李平,王冬梅,丁聪,等.黄土高寒区典型植被类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2020,40(5):1610-1620. Li Ping, Wang Dongmei, Ding Cong, et al. Soil infiltration characteristics and its influencing factors of typical vegetation type in Loess Alpine region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(5):1610-1620.
    [25] 印家旺,阿拉木萨,苏宇航,等.科尔沁沙地不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征比较研究[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(4):90-98. Yin Jiawang, Ala Musa, Su Yuhang, et al. Comparative study on soil infiltration characteristics of different land use types in Horqin sandy land[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,42(4):90-98.
    [26] 刘茜茹,冯天骄,王平,等.晋西黄土区长期植被恢复对土壤表层入渗与水分储量差异的影响[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(2):50-59. Liu Xiru, Feng Tianjiao, Wang Ping, et al. Effect of long-term vegetation restoration on surface soil water infiltration and and water storage in loess area of western province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,43(2):50-59.
    [27] 席本野.杨树根系形态、分布、动态特征及其吸水特性[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(12):37-49. Xi Benye. Morphology, distribution, dynamic characteristics of Poplar roots and its water uptake habits[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019,41(12):37-49.
    [28] Avice J C, Ourry A, Lemaire G, et al. Root protein and vegetative storage protein are key organic nutrients for alfalfa shoot regrowth[J]. Crop Science, 1997,37(4):1187-1193.
    [29] 董玉峰,姜岳忠,王卫东,等.大汶河流域杨树根系的生物量组成和空间分布[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,12(5):30-35. Dong Yufeng, Jiang Yuezhong, Wang Weidong, et al. Composition and spatial distribution of Populus root biomass in the Dawenhe Watershed[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014,12(5):30-35.
    [30] 杨文斌,王涛,熊伟,等.低覆盖度治沙理论的核心水文原理概述[J].中国沙漠,2021,41(3):75-80. Yang Wenbin, Wang Tao, Xiong Wei, et al. Overview of hydrological principle of low vegetation coverage sand control[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2021,41(3):75-80.
    [31] 陈嘉嘉,黄磊,贾鸿飞,等.腾格里沙漠人工植被区不同植被类型土壤水分垂直变异特征及其动态变化模型[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2022,36(4):126-133. Chen Jiajia, Huang Lei, Jia Hongfei, et al. Vertical variability and dynamic simulation of soil moisture in different artificial vegetation arrangements in the Tengger Desert[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022,36(4):126-133.
    [32] 吴丽丽,刘丹一,杨文斌,等.降雨量、土壤蓄水量对流动沙地土壤水分深层渗漏的影响[J].中国沙漠,2020,40(3):210-218. Wu Lili, Liu Danyi, Yang Wenbin, et al. Relationship between precipitation and soil water storage and soil deep percolation in mobile sand land[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020,40(3):210-218.
    [33] 孙于卜.晋西黄土区果农间作系统种间土壤水分竞争及调控[D].北京:北京林业大学,2019. Sun Yubu. Interspecific soil water competition and regulation of fruit intercropping system in loess region of Western Shanxi[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2019.
    [34] 朱羚,金一兰,丛日慧,等.环境因素及种间竞争在群落多样性格局中的作用[J].干旱区研究,2018,35(6):1427-1435. Zhu Ling, Jin Yilan, Cong Rihui, et al. Effects of environmental factors and interspecific competition in community biodiversity pattern[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2018,35(6):1427-1435.
    [35] 罗超,郭小平,冯昶栋,等.乌海周边土壤种子库特征及其与地上植被和土壤因子的关系[J].草业学报,2021,30(11):13-28. Luo Chao, Guo Xiaoping, Feng Changdong, et al. The characteristics of the soil seed bank in Wuhai and surrounding areas and the relationship with vegetation and soil factors[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021,30(11):13-28.
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

黄伟,杨光,马勇,刘一.不同带间距对沙区河岸固沙林带的带间土壤水分和植被群落特征的影响[J].水土保持通报英文版,2024,44(1):9-19

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:141
  • PDF: 730
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:June 26,2023
  • Revised:July 31,2023
  • Online: April 26,2024

Website Copyright © Editorial Office of Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation

Supported by:Beijing E-Tiller Technology Development Co., Ltd.