Quantitative characteristics of plant communities at different slope positions in slope-gully system on forest-steppe ecotone of the Loess Hilly-Gully region
Clc Number:

Q948

Fund Project:

Shaanxi Natural Science Foundation Research Program [2024JC-YBMS-234];Scientific Research Foundation for Doctor, Xi’an University of Science and Technology[8150124007]

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [53]
  • | | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] This study aims to investigate the quantitative characteristics of plant communities and their influencing factors under different slope positions in the Loess Plateau. This research is significant for advancing the theoretical understanding of plant community construction mechanisms within the slope-gully system of the region and for providing practical guidance in the design of artificially restored plant communities. [Methods] The study examines the composition, diversity, stability, and distribution patterns of dominant plants across five slope positions—sunny gully slope, sunny hill slope, hilltop, shady hill slope, and shady gully slope—within the forest-steppe zone of the hilly Loess Plateau under natural conditions. By integrating soil erosion intensity data, the study identifies the primary ecological factors influencing plant community construction across different slope positions. [Results] (1) In the forest-steppe zone of the hilly Loess Plateau, the sunny gully slope and sunny hill slope both exhibit a two-layer vertical structure, predominantly composed of perennial herbs and shrubs, with dominant plants showing a dispersed distribution pattern. The hilltop has a single-layer vertical structure, mainly comprising annual and perennial herbs, where plants demonstrate a highly clustered distribution. The shady gully slope community has a three-layer vertical structure, with plants also showing a clustered distribution pattern. (2) The shady gully slope has the highest species diversity, richness, and stability, whereas the sunny hill slope exhibits the lowest richness and diversity, with significant reductions of 18.4% and 26.5%, respectively, compared to the shady gully slope. The hilltop plant community shows the least stability, with a stability index of only 29. (3) The common key factors influencing community characteristics across different slope positions are soil erosion intensity and soil moisture. However, soil bulk density on the sunny gully slope, organic matter on the sunny and shady hill slopes, and light intensity on the hilltop and shady gully slope are the distinguishing ecological factors affecting plant community structure, stability, and diversity. [Conclusion] Vegetation restoration strategies should be tailored to the specific slope positions in the forest-steppe zone of the hilly Loess Plateau. For instance, the "fertile island" effect formed by perennial shrubs on the sunny gully slope can improve surface conditions, while micro-topographic modifications on the sunny hill slope can reduce soil erosion. On the hilltop, the introduction of drought-tolerant plants can enhance plant community structure. On the shady hill and gully slopes, do not excessively require the construction of complex plant community structure, so as not to cause the degradation of the herbaceous layer under the artificial forest due to insufficient light.

    Reference
    [1] Cao J, Tang G, Fang X, et al. Identification of Active Gully Erosion Sites in the Loess Plateau of China Using MF-DFA[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(3): 1-21.
    [2] He Z, Yue T, Chen Y, et al. Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Changes in Vegetation Cover and Driving Forces in the Yan River Basin, Loess Plateau[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(17): 2467-2490.
    [3] 雷斯越, 郭晋伟, 何亮. 黄土丘陵区退耕坡面草地恢复与土壤物理性质空间分异特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(1): 251-258.
    Lei S Y, Guo J W,He L. Spatial Differentiation Characteristics of Grassland Restoration and Soil Physical Properties of Slope in Hilly-gully Region of Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(1): 251-258.
    [5] [4] 张缓, 穆兴民, 高鹏. 黄土高原不同立地条件下枯落物蓄积量及持水特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(3): 45-52.
    Zhang H, Mu X M, Gao P. Variation of Litter Accumulation and Water Holding Capacity at Different Site Conditions in the Loess Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(3): 45-52.
    [7] [5] 罗梦娇, 艾宁, 刘长海. 半干旱黄土区不同植被类型对土壤水分的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2019, 37(2): 177-184.
    Luo M J, Ai N, Liu C H. Influence of Different Vegetation Types on Soil Moisture in the Semiarid Loess Region[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2019, 37(2): 177-184.
    [9] [6] 李锐. 黄土高原水土保持工作70年回顾与启示[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(06): 298-301.
    Li R. Review and Englightenments of Soil and Water Conservation on Loess Plateau in Past 70 Years[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 39(06): 298-301.
    [11] [7] Fang H-Y, Guo M. Aspect-induced differences in soil erosion intensity in a gullied hilly region on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 74(7): 5677-5685.
    [12] [8] 马晓慧, 张岩, 唐杰. 半干旱黄土区不同自然恢复时期坡面植被组成与分布特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2018, 16(2): 62-72.
    Ma X H, Zhang Y, Tang J. Composition and distribution characteristics of vegetation in different natural restoration periods in semi-arid loess region[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 16(2): 62-72.
    [14] [9] Wang B, Zhang G-H. Quantifying the Binding and Bonding Effects of Plant Roots on Soil Detachment by Overland Flow in 10 Typical Grasslands on the Loess Plateau[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2017, 81(6): 1567-1576.
    [15] [10] Yu W-J, Jiao J-Y, Chen Y, et al. Seed Removal due to Overland Flow on Abandoned Slopes in the Chinese Hilly Gullied Loess Plateau Region[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2017, 28(1): 274-282.
    [16] [11] 韩新生, 许浩, 蔡进军. 立地因子和盖度对宁南黄土区中庄小流域玉米土壤水分的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(6): 112-122.
    Han X S, Xu H, Cai J J. Effects of Site Factor and Coverage on Soil Moisture of Maize Field in Zhongzhuang Small Watershed in the Loess Area of Southern Ningxia[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 30(6): 112-122.
    [18] [12] Yu W-J, Jiao J-Y, Wang D-L, et al. Seed population dynamics on abandoned slopes in the hill and gully Loess Plateau region of China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 94(8): 427-436.
    [19] [13] Zhu H, Fu B, Wang S, et al. Reducing soil erosion by improving community functional diversity in semi-arid grasslands[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 52(4): 1063-1072.
    [20] [14] Hou J, Fu B, Wang S, et al. Comprehensive analysis of relationship between vegetation attributes and soil erosion on hillslopes in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014, 72(5): 1721-1731.
    [21] [15] Yang H, Gao J, Pan C, et al. Species composition and influencing factors of understory woody species in Robinia pseudoacacia plantations on the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2023, 34(6): 1693-1706.
    [22] [16] Yuan Z-Q. Factors affecting lucerne-rich vegetation under revegetation in a semi-arid environment[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 108(13): 249-254.
    [23] [17] 张金屯, 范丽宏. 物种功能多样性及其研究方法[J]. 山地学报, 2011, 29(5): 513-519.
    Zhang J T, Fan L H. Development of Species Functional Diversity and Its Measurement Methods[J]. Mountain Research, 2011, 29(5): 513-519.
    [25] [18] 汪殿蓓 暨淑仪, 陈飞鹏. 植物群落物种多样性研究综述[J]. 生态学杂志, 2001, (4): 55-60.
    Wang D B, Ji S Y, Chen F P. A Review on the Species Diversity of Plant Community.[J] Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2001, (4): 55-60.
    [27] [19] 秦伟, 朱清科, 张岩. 基于GIS和RUSLE的黄土高原小流域土壤侵蚀评估[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(8): 157-163.
    Qin W, Zhu Q K, Zhang Y. Soil erosion assessment of small watershed in Loess Plateau based on GIS and RUSLE[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25(8): 157-163.
    [29] [20] 郑元润. 森林群落稳定性研究方法初探[J]. 林业科学, 2000, (5): 28-32.
    Zheng Y R. Comparison of Methods for Studying Stability of Forest Community[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2000, (5): 28-32.
    [31] [21] 吴志毅, 王明玖, 李志强. 2种方法在荒漠草原植物种群分布格局中的适用性比较[J]. 草业科学, 2008, (4): 145-147.
    Wu Z Y, Wang M J, Li Z Q. Suitability comparison of two methods for population distribution patterns measure in desert steppe[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2008, (4): 145-147.
    [33] [22] Ma R, Hu F, Xu C, et al. Response of soil aggregate stability and splash erosion to different breakdown mechanisms along natural vegetation restoration[J]. Catena, 2022, 208(1): 460-468.
    [34] [23] 王国鹏, 肖波, 李胜龙. 黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区生物结皮的地表粗糙度特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(10): 3050-3056.
    Wang G P, Xiao B, Li S L. Surface roughness of biological soil crusts and its influencing factors in the water-wind erosion crisscross region on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38(10): 3050-3056.
    [36] [24] 朱启明, 刘俊娥, 周正朝. 黄土高原土壤可蚀性因子空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(6): 50-56.
    Zhu Q M, Liu J E, Zhou Z C. Research on the Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Erodibility Factors of the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 37(6): 50-56.
    [38] [25] Li C, Yang X, Liu H, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of discontinuous hillslope gullies on the Loess Plateau of China: A special focus on spoon gullies[J]. Catena, 2022, 215(9): 241-258.
    [39] [26] 崔光帅, 罗天祥, 梁尔源. 干旱半干旱区灌丛对草本植物的促进作用研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1321-1333.
    Cui G S, Luo T X, Liang E Y. Advances in the study of shrubland facilitation on herbs in arid and semiarid regions[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2022, 46(11): 1321-1333.
    [41] [27] Feng T, Wei T, Keesstra S D, et al. Long-term effects of vegetation restoration on hydrological regulation functions and the implications to afforestation on the Loess Plateau[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2023, 330(3): 120-131.
    [42] [28] Li Z, Li X, Zhou S, et al. A comprehensive review on coupled processes and mechanisms of soil-vegetation-hydrology, and recent research advances[J]. Science China-Earth Sciences, 2022, 65(11): 2083-2114.
    [43] [29] Guo M, Wang W, Kang H, et al. Changes in soil properties and erodibility of gully heads induced by vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(5): 712-725.
    [44] [30] Dong L, Liu Y, Wu J, et al. The distribution of soil C and N along the slope is regulated by vegetation type on the Loess Plateau[J]. Catena, 2023, 226(7): 1-13.
    [45] [31] Liang H, Li Y, An X, et al. Soil Moisture Dynamics and Its Temporal Stability under Different-Aged Caragana korshinskii Shrubs in the Loess Hilly Region of China[J]. Water, 2023, 15(13): 2813-2826.
    [46] [32] 张龙齐, 贾国栋, 吕相融. 黄土高原典型地区不同植被覆盖下坡面土壤侵蚀阈值研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(2): 187-198.
    Zhang L Q, Jia G D, Lv X R. Research of Soil Erosion Thresholds on the Lower Slopes of Different Vegetation Cover in Typical Areas of Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 37(2): 187-198.
    [48] [33] 罗鑫萍, 张祖欣, 陈大立. 黄土高原人工灌草系统不同立地条件土壤种子库特征[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 940-946.
    Luo X P,Zhang X Z, Chen D L. Soil Seed Bank Characteristics Across Different Stand Condition of Artificial Shrub Grass Ecosystem on the Loess Plateau[J] Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 940-946.
    [50] [34] Zhang X, Adamowski J F, Liu C, et al. Which slope aspect and gradient provides the best afforestation-driven soil carbon sequestration on the China''s Loess Plateau?[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2020, 147(6): 1-9.
    [51] [35] Zhao Y, Wang Y, Wang L, et al. Exploring the role of land restoration in the spatial patterns of deep soil water at watershed scales[J]. Catena, 2019, 172(1): 387-396.
    [52] [36] 林枫, 王丽芳, 文琦. 黄土高原土壤有机碳固存对植被恢复的动态响应及其碳汇价值[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(3): 53-58.
    Lin F, Wang L F, Wen Q. Dynamic Responses of Sequestration of Soil Organic Carbon to Vegetation Restoration and the Values of Carbon Sink in the Loess Plateau[J] Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(3): 53-58.
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:22
  • PDF: 0
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:April 24,2024
  • Revised:September 02,2024
  • Adopted:September 05,2024