• Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [34]
  • | | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective]To explore the effects of different soil and water conservation measures on soil nutrients and plant diversity in open pit coal mine dumps, and to provide feasible technical measures for ecological restoration of mine dumps and other abandoned lands.[Methods]Eight soil and water conservation measures combining soil and water conservation engineering measures and plant measures were deployed on the exposed slopes of the grassland open pit coal mine discharge site, with no measures (CK) as the control, using sample methods to investigate the characteristics of the plant community and to determine the main physicochemical properties of the soil, to compare and analyze the differences in the changes in the characteristics of the plant community and soil properties of the different soil and water conservation measures, and to analyze the redundancy method to analyze the relationship between the characteristics of the plant community and the characteristics of the soil. The redundancy method was used to analyze the correlation between plant community characteristics and soil properties.[Result]The soil and water conservation measures taken on the slope of the discharge site had different degrees of influence on the main physicochemical properties of the soil, in which the soil quick-acting nutrient content changed significantly (P<0.05), and the soil quick-acting phosphorus content of the two measures, spreading mixed grass + ecological bag spacing 1m (Ⅱ) and spreading mixed grass + ecological bag spacing 2m (Ⅲ), reached 3.38 mg/kg and 3.13 mg/kg, which increased 53.6% and 42.3% compared with that of the control (CK) (2.20mg/kg) respectively. 2.20 mg/kg) increased by 53.6% and 42.3%, respectively. The soil quick-effect potassium content of the three measures of spreading mixed grass + ecological bag spacing 2 m (Ⅲ), spreading mixed grass + geocell (Ⅶ), spreading mixed grass + grass curtain (Ⅷ) was 108.25 mg/kg, 126.25 mg/kg, 124.00 mg/kg, and the soil quick-effect potassium content of the control plot was only 53.25 mg/kg. The effects of soil and water conservation measures on plant community characteristics were mainly manifested in the Simpson's dominance index, which was significantly higher than that of the control (CK), except for the insignificant differences (P>0.05) between the spreading of sedge + salix psammophila sand barriers (Ⅵ) and the spreading of sedge + geocell (Ⅶ) (P<0.05). The results of redundancy analysis showed that Margalef richness, Simpson dominance index and Shannon-Wiener diversity index were all significantly positively correlated with soil quick-acting phosphorus; Louie evenness index was significantly positively correlated with soil total nitrogen, quick-acting potassium and slow-acting potassium.[Conclusion]The implementation of soil and water conservation measures in open-pit coal mine dumps can improve the soil nutrient content and plant diversity, which has a positive effect on ecological restoration; the soil and water conservation measures of spreading mixed grass + ecological bag with an interval of 2m (Ⅲ) and spreading mixed grass + salix psammophila sand barriers (Ⅵ) have a better ecological restoration effect, which can be popularized and applied as the main measures for ecological restoration of dumps in the mining area.

    Reference
    [1] 阎仲康, 曹银贵, 李志涛,等.内蒙古东部草原区矿山生态修复研究:关键技术与减碳路径[J].农业资源与环境学报,2023,40(03):570-582.https://doi:10.13254/j.jare.2022.0713.
    [2] 李全生.东部草原区大型煤电基地开发的生态影响与修复技术[J].煤炭学报,2019,44(12):3625-3635.https://doi:10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.SH19.1365.
    [3] 高志香,李希来,张静,等.覆土处理对高寒矿区露天煤矿排土场植被和土壤特征的影响[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(01):82-87+96.https://doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.012.
    [4] 徐佳,曹雪峰,王玺圳,等.半干旱地区矿区生态系统土壤保持功能评价——以神府—东胜矿区为例[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(04):178-185.https://doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230508.002.
    [5] 丰菲,许丽,顾清敏,等.宁东矿区天然植物群落特征及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(06):48-56.https://doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.008.
    [6] 李轲,赵勇钢,刘小芳,等.黄土丘陵区典型草地演替中植物群落特征与土壤储水量关系[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(01):55-60.https://doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.01.009.
    [7] 陈卓鑫,郭明明,王文龙,等.白草塬植被恢复后沟头草本植物多样性与土壤因子的关系[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(04):53-60+76.https://doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.007.
    [8] 吕文星,高亚军,徐十锋,等.多沙粗沙区露天煤矿水土保持生态效应的监测评价[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(03):101-107+118.https://doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.03.017.
    [9] 珊丹,崔崴,邢恩德,等.矿山废弃地植被恢复对土壤养分的影响与评价[J/OL].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2024,(01):101-110[2024-04-19].https://doi.org/10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.202306032.
    [10] 刘宝昌,刘畅,王凯,等.矿山排土场边坡植被恢复过程中土壤团聚体稳定性机制[J].重庆理工大学学报(自然科学),2023,37(01):257-264.https://doi: 10.3969 /j.issn.1674-8425(z).023.01.029.
    [11] 道日娜,张英,李强,等.高寒煤矿渣山植被恢复过程中土壤生物化学性质与真菌多样性变异特征研究[J/OL].微生物学报,1-24[2024-04-19].https://doi.org/10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20230733.
    [12] 王德富,董凌勃,李澳,等.毛乌素沙地不同植被恢复类型的土壤碳水效应[J/OL].水土保持学报,1-11[2024-04-19].https://doi.org/10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.03.006.
    [13] 张进德,郗富瑞.我国废弃矿山生态修复研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(21):7921-7930.https://doi:10.5846/stxb201908301799.
    [14] 刘百灵,李仓水.复垦植被对排土场土壤持水能力的影响与评价[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2023,43(06):89-98.https://doi:10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.202306027.
    [15] 于爽,朱月,徐长友,等.内蒙古高寒露天煤矿排土场植被恢复研究[J].西北植物学报,2023,43(07):1208-1217.https://doi:10.7606/j.issn. 1000-4025.2023.07.1208.
    [16] 庞景豪,梁燊,刘亚斌,等.恢复年限对高寒金属矿山排土场植物多样性和土壤化学特性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(04):110-120.https://doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.014.
    [17] 杨广庆,王贺,刘华北,等.HDPE土工格栅加筋土结构的筋材长期强度研究[J].东华大学学报(自然科学版),2014,40(02):167-170.
    [18] 井明博,周天林,梁健,等.4种适生植物对陇东地区油污土壤场地生态修复的响应[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(01):286-293.https://doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.01.045.
    [19] 曾仟,徐雪婷,张亚见,等.腐殖酸和植物促生芽孢杆菌对黑麦草抗逆性及砒砂岩土壤性状的影响[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(02):208-214+266.https://doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.028.
    [20] 翟元杰,梁佩芳.外来植物入侵对乡土植物土壤氮素及其代谢酶活性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(06):29-33+42.https://doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.005.
    [21] 刘灿然,马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法V.生物群落物种数目的估计方法[J].生态学报,1997,(06):39-48.
    [22] 戈峰,刘向辉,丁岩钦.不同类型的棉田生态系统功能特征[J].生态学报,2002,(09):1433-1439.
    [23] Kuzyakov Y ,Hill W P ,Jones L D .Root exudate components change litter decomposition in a simulated rhizosphere depending on temperature[J].Plant and Soil,2007,290(1-2):293-305.https://doi:10.1007/s11104-006-9162-8.
    [24] 邢慧,张婕,白中科,等.安太堡露天矿排土场植被恢复模式与土壤因子相关性研究[J].环境科学与管理,2015,40(01):82-85.
    [25] Liu Y ,Xiuwei W ,Zijun M , et al.Root Exudation Rates Decrease with Increasing Latitude in Some Tree Species[J].Forests,2020,11(10):1045-1045.https://doi:10.3390/f11101045.
    [26] Meier C I .Roots and rhizospheres in forest ecosystems: Recent advances and future challenges[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2018,4311-5.https://doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.08.005.
    [27] C I M ,Timo T ,Julian H , et al.Root exudation of mature beech forests across a nutrient availability gradient: the role of root morphology and fungal activity.[J].New phytologist,2020,226(2):583-594.https://doi:10.1111/nph.16389.
    [28] 李鹏飞,张兴昌,朱首军,等.植被恢复对黑岱沟矿区排土场土壤性质的影响[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(05):64-70.https://doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.05.078.
    [29] 徐志果.安太堡露天矿复垦地草本植物群落多样性研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2013.
    [30] 金立群,李希来,孙华方,等.高寒矿区排土场不同坡向植被和土壤特征研究[J].土壤,2020,52(04):831-839.https://doi:10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2020.04.025.
    [31] Koch D E, Mahler R L, Dingo D G. Stratifying land use/land cover for spatial analysis of disease ecology and risk: an example using object-based classification techniques[J]. Geo spat Health, 2007, 2(1): 15-28https://doi:10.4081/gh.2007.251
    [32] 黄雅茹,辛智鸣,葛根巴图,等.乌兰布和沙漠东北缘典型灌木群落多样性与土壤养分相关性研究[J].中国农业科技导报,2018,20(09):95-105.https://doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2017.0478.
    [33] 毕银丽,李向磊,彭苏萍,等.露天矿区植物多样性与土壤养分空间变异性特征[J].煤炭科学技术,2020,48(12):205-213.https://doi:10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2020.12.026.
    [34] 张亦扬.榆神府采煤塌陷区不同植被恢复方式下土壤与植物演替规律及其耦合关系[D].西安科技大学,2019.
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:43
  • PDF: 0
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:April 25,2024
  • Revised:August 22,2024
  • Adopted:August 22,2024