• Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [39]
  • | | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] Ecological performance is an important indicator to reflect the stable development of ecological and economic systems, which can show the coordination between ecological protection and high-quality development, and the scientific evaluation of ecological performance is of great significance to the sustainable development of the Yellow River Basin in Shanxi. [Method] Taking the Yellow River Basin in Shanxi as the study area, we constructed a theoretical framework based on the "Pressure-State-Response" model, and applied the methods of InVEST, SFA and coupling coordination degree to evaluate the spatial and temporal interactions of ecological performance from 2010 to 2020, and carried out bottom-up ecological performance optimization partitioning based on the current situation of ecological performance level and spatial distribution characteristics. The optimization zoning of ecological performance was carried out bottom-up based on the current situation of ecological performance level and spatial distribution characteristics. [Result] ①From 2010 to 2020, the ecosystem services index of the Yellow River Basin in Shanxi increased by 2.27%, and the spatial distribution was "north-south vertical, high and low", forming a double-core pattern mainly in the Lvliang Mountains and Taiyue Mountains-Zhongtiao Mountains. ②From 2010 to 2020, the ecological efficiency of the Yellow River Basin in Shanxi increased by 43.48%, and the spatial distribution was "low in the centre and high in the periphery".③From 2010 to 2020, the ecological performance of the Yellow River Basin in Shanxi increased by 35.29%, with a spatial distribution of "low in the centre and high in the periphery". ④Based on the characteristics of spatial differentiation of ecological performance, the study area was divided into ecological performance remodelling area, ecological performance improvement area, ecological performance buffer area, ecological performance enhancement area and ecological performance conservation area, and the targeted ecological performance improvement paths were proposed. [Conclusion] The study breaks through the traditional understanding and evaluation of ecological performance, and proposes a coupled evaluation system of “ecosystem services +ecological efficiency”, which provides a new way of thinking for the study of ecological performance.

    Reference
    [1] Feng Lan, Zhao Hui, Jing Bian, et al. Ecological Well-Being Performance Evaluation and Spatio-Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Urban Agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Land,2022,11(11):20-44.
    [2] V. Whitford, A. R. Ennos, J. F. Handley. “City Form and Natural Process” —— Indicators for the Ecological Performance of Urban Areas and Their Application to Merseyside[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001,57 (2):0-103.
    [3] 常梦杰.基于DEA-SBM 模型的黄河流域生态效率研究[J].现代商贸工业,2022,43(04):4-6.
    [4] 范昀昀.长三角城市群生态效率评价研究[D].安徽 合肥:安徽大学,2021.
    [5] Thinh N, Behnisch M, Ultsch A. Examination of Several Results of Different Cluster Analyses with a Separate View to Balancing the Economic and Ecological Performance Potential of Towns and Cities[C]// Birkhäuser Boston.Advances in Data Analysis. Germany:Springer-Verlag Berlin, 2007:289-296.
    [6] Lovell ST, Johnston DM. Designing Landscapes for Performance Based on Emerging Principles in Landscape Ecology[J]. Ecology and Society, 2009,14(1):AR 44(-):-.
    [7] Baholli I, Stana A, Karafili M. Indrit Baholli, Alma Stana, Mimoza Karafili Can Albanian Port Area be Part of The European Network of Eco-Ports Based on Environmental Information Systems?[J]. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2013,(02):139-148.
    [8] 黄凡.企业集群生态绩效评价指标体系及评价模型研究[D].广西壮族自治区 南宁:广西大学,2009.
    [9] 安超,沈清基.基于空间利用生态绩效的绿色基础设施网络构建方法[J].风景园林,2013,(02):22-31.
    [10] 孟雪,狄乾斌,季建文.京津冀城市群生态绩效水平测度及影响因素[J].经济地理,2020,40(01):181-186 225.
    [11] 邓元杰.黄土高原退耕还林工程生态绩效评价研究[D].陕西 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2023.
    [12] Chen Y , Ma L , Zhu Z .The environmental-adjusted energy efficiency of China''s construction industry: a three-stage undesirable SBM-DEA model[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021,(2021):1-14.
    [13] 曾贤刚,牛木川.高质量发展下长江经济带生态效率及影响因素[J].中国环境科学,2020,40(02):906-918.
    [14] 余艺敏.成都都市圈生态绩效评价及影响因素研究[C]//中国城市规划学会.人民城市,规划赋能——2022中国城市规划年会论文集(14区域规划与城市经济).湖北 武汉: 中国城市规划学会,2023:140-159.
    [15] 柯超.大城市边缘区新城空间生态绩效评价及管控研究[D].湖北 武汉:武汉理工大学,2021.
    [16] 孙久文,崔雅琪,张皓.黄河流域城市群生态保护与经济发展耦合的时空格局与机制分析[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(07):1673-1690.
    [17] 吴树荣,潘换换,姬倩倩等.基于生态系统服务的山西黄河流域保护优先区识别[J].生态学报,2022,42(20):8126-8137.
    [18] 付建新.山西黄河流域不同土地利用类型NDVI时空变化及其对气温、降水的响应[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(03):364-372.
    [19] 赵云燕.京津冀晋地区生态绩效水平测度及影响因素研究[D].山西 太原:山西财经大学,2024.
    [20] 安超.城乡空间利用生态绩效的内涵、表现及内在机理探析[J].城市发展研究,2013,20(06):16-24.
    [21] 谢卧龙,罗锦洪,焦娇.山西全省域大气污染源布局敏感性评估[J].环境影响评价,2021,43(03):76-80.
    [22] Reid W V , Mooney H A , Cropper A ,et al.Ecosystems and human well-being - Synthesis: A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [J].Environmental Systems Analysis ,2005,3(40):4-42.
    [23] 欧阳志云,朱春全,杨广斌,等.生态系统生产总值核算:概念、核算方法与案例研究[J].生态学报,2013,33(21):6747-6761.
    [24] 王培家,章锦河,杨良健,等.典型旅游城市生态系统服务时空演变及其影响因素——以黄山市为例[J].生态学报,2024,44(09):3897-3910.
    [25] 高阳,沈振,张中浩,等.生态系统服务视角下的社会—生态系统耦合模拟研究进展[J].地理学报,2024,79(01):134-146.
    [26] 彭立,邓伟,黄佩,等.四川盆地多重生态系统服务景观指数评价与服务簇识别[J].生态学报,2021,41(23):9328-9340.
    [27] 赵武生,石培基.基于InVEST模型的复合生态系统耦合协调关系研究——以兰西城市群为例[J].中国环境科学,2023,43(04):1883-1894.
    [28] 陈进,陶恩泽,陶红,等.宁夏沿黄城市带耕地碳排放时空特征和生态效率评价[J/OL].水土保持通报,2024[2024-08-10].https://doi.org/10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.
    [29] 刘书畅,叶艳妹,肖武.基于随机前沿分析的中国城市土地利用效率时空分异研究[J].中国土地科学,2020,34(01):61-69. Liu Shuchang, Ye Yanmei, Xiao Wu. Research on spatiotemporal differentiation of urban land use efficiency in China based on stochastic frontier analysis [J]. China Land Science, 2020,34 (01): 61-69.
    [30] 丁莲,白羽萍,张莉金,等.黄河流域城市群土地利用及生态效率时空演变分析[J].生态学报,2023,43(18):7610-7622.
    [31] 曾雅婷,李宾,吕亚荣.中国粮食生产技术效率区域差异及其影响因素——基于超越对数形式随机前沿生产函数的测度[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(06):13-21 36.
    [32] PITT M M,LEE L F. The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the indonesian weaving industry[J]. Journal of Development Economics,1981,9(1):43-64.
    [33] 郭珊珊.黄河流域生态系统健康与城镇化耦合协调研究[D].江苏 徐州:中国矿业大学,2023.
    [34] 王淑佳,孔伟,任亮,等.国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(03):793-810.
    [35] 王成,唐宁.重庆市乡村三生空间功能耦合协调的时空特征与格局演化[J].地理研究,2018,37(06):1100-1114.
    [36] 赵雪雁,杜昱璇,李花,等.黄河中游城镇化与生态系统服务耦合关系的时空变化[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(01):131-147.
    [37] 王淑佳,孔伟,任亮等.国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(03):793-810.
    [38] 王成,唐宁.重庆市乡村三生空间功能耦合协调的时空特征与格局演化[J].地理研究,2018,37(06):1100-1114.
    [39] 赵雪雁,杜昱璇,李花,等.黄河中游城镇化与生态系统服务耦合关系的时空变化[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(01):131-147.
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:32
  • PDF: 0
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:June 29,2024
  • Revised:August 28,2024
  • Adopted:August 28,2024