• Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [28]
  • | | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] In order to clarify the diversity of herbaceous plants in the herbaceous felt layer in Ngoring Lake area, and the measures to prevent and control the damage of landslides, this study was conducted to investigate the diversity of herbaceous plants in Ngoring Lake area. On this basis, further carry out the experimental study on the single-root tensile strength characteristics of the root system of the dominant herbaceous plants, so as to provide theoretical basis for the quantitative evaluation of the indexes of single-root tensile strength characteristics of the herbaceous felt layer and the study of the destruction mechanism of the herbaceous felt layer slides in the Ngoring Lake area. [Methods] Based on the results of the sample survey in the study area, single-root tensile tests were carried out on the dominant herbaceous plants in the area; the differences in single-root tensile strength, single-root tensile strength, single-root ultimate elongation and single-root modulus of elasticity of the different herbaceous plants and their relationship with the root diameter were analysed comparatively in different root-diameter levels. [Results] The dominant herbaceous plants in the study area were Carex moorcroftii Falc. ex Boott, Astragalus polycladus Bur. et Franch., Artemisia frigida Willd., Poa annua L., Leontopodium pusillum (Beauverd) Hand.-Mazz. and Lagotis brachystachya Maxim. Under the condition of root diameter range of 0.10~0.60 mm, the single root tensile force and single root tensile strength of the above six herbaceous plants showed the trend of power function growth and power function decrease with the increase of root diameter, respectively, respectively, and there was no significant functional relationship between the single root ultimate elongation and single root elastic modulus and root diameter. Considering the mechanical property indexes of single root tensile resistance, species importance value and root type of different plant types, Poa annua L. had the best soil fixation capacity in Ngoring Lake area. [Conclusion] The root systems of the six dominant herbaceous plants in the study area have better soil-fixing potential, among which the Poa annua L. has the strongest soil-fixing ability, and the results of this study can provide a certain basis for the soil and water conservation project in the Ngoring Lake area.

    Reference
    [1] 张蕴帅, 黄倩, 马耀明, 等. 黄河源区鄂陵湖湖面和湖边草地对流边界层湍流结构特征的大涡模拟研究[J]. 大气科学, 2021, 45(02): 435-455.
    [2] 严作良, 周华坤, 刘伟, 等. 江河源区草地退化状况及成因[J]. 中国草地, 2003(01): 74-79.
    [3] 李小娟, 张莉, 张紫萍, 等. 高寒草甸生物结皮发育特征及其对土壤水文过程的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(06): 139-144.
    [4] 李娜, 王琳, 文广超, 等. 黄河源头鄂陵湖面积变化及驱动力分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2023(10): 7-13+33.
    [5] 苏培玺, 周紫鹃, 侍瑞, 等. 高寒草毡层基本属性与固碳能力沿水分和海拔梯度的变化[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(03): 1040-1052.
    [6] 孙鸿烈, 郑度, 姚檀栋, 等. 青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(01): 3-12.
    [7] Stokes A, Douglas G B, Fourcaud T, et al. Ecologicalmitigation of hillslope instability: Ten key issues facing researchers and practitioners[J]. Plant and Soil, 2014, 377(1-2): 1-23.
    [8] 周云艳, 陈建平, 王晓梅. 植物根系固土护坡机理的研究进展及展望[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(6): 1171-1177.
    [9] Baets S D, Poesen J, Reubens B, et al. Root tensile strength and root distribution of typical mediterranean plant species and their contribution to soil shear strength[J]. Plant and Soil, 2008, 305(1-2): 207-226.
    [10] 周德培, 张俊云. 植被护坡工程技术[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2003.
    [11] Wu T H, Mckinell W P, Swanston D N. Strength of tree roots and landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1979, 16(1): 19-33.
    [12] Abe K, lwamoto M. An evaluation of tree-root effect on slope stability by tree-root strength[J]. J Jpn Forestry Sci, 1986(69): 505-510.
    [13] 程洪, 张新全. 草本植物根系网固土原理的力学试验探究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2002(05): 20-23.
    [14] 刘国彬, 蒋定生, 朱显谟. 黄土区草地根系生物力学特性研究[J]. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报, 1996(03): 21-28.
    [15] 李绍才, 孙海龙, 杨志荣, 等. 护坡植物根系与岩体相互作用的力学特性[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006(10): 2051-2057.
    [16] 杨维西, 黄治江. 黄土高原九个水土保持树种根的抗拉力[J]. 中国水土保持,1988(9): 49-51.
    [17] 朱海丽, 胡夏嵩, 毛小青, 等. 青藏高原黄土区护坡灌木植物根系力学特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2008(S2): 3445-3452.
    [18] 唐恬, 王磊, 文小航. 黄河源鄂陵湖地区辐射收支和地表能量平衡特征研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(6): 1462-1473.
    [19] 李万寿, 冯玲, 孙胜利. 扎陵湖、鄂陵湖对黄河源头年径流的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2001(1): 75-82.
    [20] 运志辉. 高原冻土路基边坡病害机制研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2023.
    [21] 张镱锂, 刘林山, 摆万奇, 等. 黄河源地区草地退化空间特征[J]. 地理学报, 2006, (1): 3-14.
    [22] 杨鑫光, 李希来, 金立群, 等. 不同人工恢复措施下高寒矿区煤矸石山植被和土壤恢复效果研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(3) : 1-11.
    [23] 李瑞, 张克斌, 刘云芳, 等. 西北半干旱区湿地生态系统植物群落空间分布特征研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2008, 30(1): 6-13.
    [24] 邵田田, 王明玖, 齐雪. 草原露天煤矿排土场重建植被与土壤相关性研究[J]. 草原与草业, 2021, 33(3): 21-27.
    [25] 及金楠, 吴智阳, 姚安坤. 林木根系单根的生物力学特性[J]. 福建农林大学学报: 自然科学版, 2012, 41(2): 140-144.
    [26] 钟荣华, 鲍玉海, 贺秀斌, 等. 三峡水库消落带4种草本根系抗拉特性及根系粘聚力[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(04): 188-194.
    [27] 李成凯. 青藏高原黄土区四种草本植物单根抗拉特性研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 2008(05): 33-35+60.
    [28] 张超波, 周霞, 李东嵘, 等. 山西土石山区3种草本植物根拉拨特性[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(03): 300-304.1
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:29
  • PDF: 0
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:July 05,2024
  • Revised:August 23,2024
  • Adopted:August 24,2024